Gregor Jasny writes:
> Does this sound reasonable?
Yes. Please also read the earlier thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00356.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:50:35PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> I quite not agree with both "solutions" to use debian/README.source
> or debian/upstream. Here's why.
>
> 1/ Packaging workflow with upstream Git repository
> ...
I agree that debian/README.source is no solution because it is no
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:50:35PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> When using Git, it's quite a common practice to only store the debian
> branch on Alioth, then have the master branch stored ... upstream.
> See for example:
>
> http://openstack.alioth.debian.org/
How common? I've never seen it do
On 06/15/2012 01:50 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> While having a standardized way would be useful, there's just so many
> workflows, that you can't possibly cover all of them with a single
> syntax, and in the end, you'd end up with having to call
> package-specific scripts in the source.
>
> We alread
On 06/15/2012 11:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Yeah, a hook of any sorts is ok for me. The get-vcs-source in debian/rules
> seems quite ok to me. Should debcheckout be modified to call it? It's part
> of devscript, do you think it's ok if I submit a wishlist bug report against
> devscript to ask f
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:37:18AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Learning not to use /tmp to place large files. Setting TMPDIR=/home/tmp
/tmp is for temporary files, and I expect to place files there as large
as the partition is. I am not interested in analysing the files in what
tempo
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> On 06/15/2012 11:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Yeah, a hook of any sorts is ok for me. The get-vcs-source in debian/rules
>> seems quite ok to me. Should debcheckout be modified to call it? It's part
>> of devscript, do you think it's ok if I submit a wishlist bug rep
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:22:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Theodore Ts'o" writes:
>
> > If a required package (such as e2fslibs, which is required by e2fsprogs)
> > provides multiarch support, then Lintian requires that the package have
> > a dependency on the package "multiarch-support"[1]
Hi,
I'm trying to understand a better way of using the Origin: field as
specified by DEP-3.
I'm currently using something like this:
Origin: http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git;a=commitdiff;h=8f00911a21
f4e95de84c60e09cc4df173e5b6701
since DEP-3 seems to strongly encourage a URL. Bu
"Theodore Ts'o" writes:
> P.S. One of the things I'm thinking about doing is writing a script which
> automatically generates the debian/patches directory from the git
> repository. So when I specify the base release (i.e., v1.42.4), it will
> do something like git format-patch, but in a debian/
Hi there!
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:39:35 +0200, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> From reading the DEP-3, it mentions the use of the Commit: identifier,
> but doesn't give any examples of how this would be done. Would
> something like this be acceptable instead?
>
> Origin: upstream, Commit:8f00911a21
This i
Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old)
and upstream is now at version 1.0.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Martin Pitt writes ("Re: DEP-8 extension proposal: Add source package header"):
> Subscribed. Thanks for bouncing it, as I cannot mail Ian directly
> (his MTA rejects my mail server).
If you send a copy of the bounce to postmaster@chiark I will add an
exception entry to my spamfilter.
> Stefano Z
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Georges Khaznadar
* Package name: pycode-browser
Version : 20120614+git+b041dd2
Upstream Authors : Vibeesh P ,
Vimal Joseph ,
Ajith Kumar
* URL : https://github.c
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 08:54 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
> The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old)
> and upstream is now at version 1.0.3
This is another example (of many) on how old-fashioned the Debian
p
Hi Chris,
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 00:13:41, Chris Halls a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Chris Halls
>
> Package name: gwt (binaries libgwt-dev-java and libgwt-user-java)
> Version : 2.4.0
> Upstream Author : Google Inc
> URL : http://googl
may be because
$> links -dump https://irqbalance.org/download.html | grep -A2 Latest
Latest release
Source Code: irqbalance-0.56.tar.bz2 (28Kb)
?
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
> The current Debian package
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:57:02PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> There is already a "gwt" package in unstable [1]
Sorry I had already realised this and closed this bug report again.
One of the other gwt dependencies had been removed completely, and gwt
has been removed from testing but not
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
> > The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old)
> > and upstream is now at version 1.0.3
> This is another example (of many) on how old-fashioned the Debian
> package
❦ 16 juin 2012 00:08 CEST, Yaroslav Halchenko :
> $> links -dump https://irqbalance.org/download.html | grep -A2 Latest
> Latest release
>
>Source Code: irqbalance-0.56.tar.bz2 (28Kb)
>
> ?
The new home is:
http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
There was recently a major update which leade
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:08:14 -0400
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> may be because
>
> $> links -dump https://irqbalance.org/download.html | grep -A2 Latest
> Latest release
>
>Source Code: irqbalance-0.56.tar.bz2 (28Kb)
>
> ?
The project home page moved. The old one is out of date.
--
To U
On 06/16/2012 12:34 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:08:14 -0400
> Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>> may be because
>>
>> $> links -dump https://irqbalance.org/download.html | grep -A2 Latest
>> Latest release
>>
>>Source Code: irqbalance-0.56.tar.bz2 (28Kb)
>>
>> ?
>
> The
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 08:54 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
> The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old)
> and upstream is now at version 1.0.3
As someone else pointed out, it would help if the maintainers got t
2012/6/15 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
>>> This is often seen as not a good move to have a user-writable directory
>>> on the system partition(s), since this provides for easy DOS
>>
>> DoS like what? /tmp on disk have a 5% safety limit available for system,
>> user can "DoS" only his own process
> As someone else pointed out, it would help if the maintainers got
> their
> act together and made irqbalance.org point to this. It's not as if
> they're unassociated with the owner of that domain.
Maybe I need to take a trip over and knock on the door...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 08:54:23AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/
>The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old)
>and upstream is now at version 1.0.3
Uploaded 1.0.3-1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
26 matches
Mail list logo
