On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:50:35PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> I quite not agree with both "solutions" to use debian/README.source
> or debian/upstream. Here's why.
>
> 1/ Packaging workflow with upstream Git repository
> ...
I agree that debian/README.source is no solution because it is no
machine parseable format. However in your reasoning I was not able to
find a reason against debian/upstream. If this file would be
established as a default file and would be used by the according tools
everything you want to aproach would be possible.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120615072025.gd16...@an3as.eu
