On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:58:55AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > 4. Once I had a symbols file that resulted in a successful build and that
> >I could have uploaded, I started thinking about how I was going to
> >maintain it. With a C
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:53:04PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm currently working on the Policy modification to document (and
> recommend) use of symbols instead of shlibs, but I'd only personally used
> symbols with C libraries. Today I decided that I should try adding a
> symbols file to a C
On 2012-01-26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> But that feels like a result contrary to what I had previously thought was
> the intended direction, so I wanted to ask the Debian development
> community as a whole: am I missing something? Are these symbols files
> actually useful?
Symbol files are nice if
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> 4. Once I had a symbols file that resulted in a successful build and that
>>I could have uploaded, I started thinking about how I was going to
>>maintain it. With a C program, I would change the symbols file
>>vers
> > The code is GPL and the gfx and data is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
>
> This is the first time I've heard a mention of a CC license. There is nothing
> in the source tarball mentioning a Creative Commons license. If you really
> mean
> it to be CC BY-NC-SA 3.0, you have to clearly specify that in the s
On 26/01/2012 09:08, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-01-26, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> But that feels like a result contrary to what I had previously thought was
>> the intended direction, so I wanted to ask the Debian development
>> community as a whole: am I missing something? Are these symbols files
On Do, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:26:15 (CET), Jérémy Lal wrote:
[...]
> About what i wonder (since i'm not c++ expert) if abi-compliance-checker
> is serious enough to be used to decide soname bumps ?
> http://www.upstream-tracker.org/
Thank you very much for pointing out this service. It surely is ver
On 26/01/2012 14:53, Russ Allbery wrote:
> 5. The exported symbols of the library contained many symbols that
>obviously weren't really from that library, but instead were artifacts
>of the C++ compilation process, things like instantiations of
>std::vector. Do those go into the symbol
On 2012-01-26, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> About what i wonder (since i'm not c++ expert) if abi-compliance-checker
> is serious enough to be used to decide soname bumps ?
> http://www.upstream-tracker.org/
The abi checker that iirc is hosted somewhere underneath linuxfoundation
is producing quite good r
On 2012-01-26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I certainly believe there are carefully-maintained C++ libraries that are
> more conservative and that go to the required effort to make this work
> properly, and KDE is probably an excellent example of a large C++ project
> with enough C++ experts involved to
On 2012-01-26, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> (c++|regex)"MediaInfoLib::MediaInfo::Count_Get\(MediaInfoLib::stream_t,
> unsigned (int|long)\)@Base" 0.7.52
(subst)MediaInfoLib::MediaInfo::Count_Get(MediaInfoLib::stream_t
{size_t})@base 0.7.52
note that you might actually want to use the mangled symbol
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Richard Sweeney wrote:
> OK, what's the best approach for that? I've updated the readme in the doc
> directory to reflect that, so it'll be present in the source. Can I just
> include the same file in the binary release? The readme file is here:
>
> http://legendof
On 26/01/2012 17:06, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-01-26, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> (c++|regex)"MediaInfoLib::MediaInfo::Count_Get\(MediaInfoLib::stream_t,
>> unsigned (int|long)\)@Base" 0.7.52
>
> (subst)MediaInfoLib::MediaInfo::Count_Get(MediaInfoLib::stream_t
> {size_t})@base 0.7.52
That feat
On 2012-01-26, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> (subst)MediaInfoLib::MediaInfo::Count_Get(MediaInfoLib::stream_t
>> {size_t})@base 0.7.52
>
> That feature has not been implemented, and its bug[1] has been tagged won=
> tfix.
it's available in pkg-kde-tools as mentioned at other places in this
thread.
>
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 10:00 +, Richard Sweeney wrote:
> The reason for choosing NC is because I don't want someone
> selling something I'm giving away for nothing.
> I take it there's no Debian compatible license
> that allows me to do this?
That would go against items 5 and 6 of the DFSG:
h
(Apologies if this top posts, sending from my phone)
The reason for choosing NC is because I don't want someone
selling something I'm giving away for nothing.
I take it there's no Debian compatible license
that allows me to do this?
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:28:38 +0800
> Subject: Re: Bug#65381
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Richard Sweeney wrote:
> OK, what's the best approach for that? I've updated the readme in the doc
> directory to reflect that, so it'll be present in the source. Can I just
> include the same file in the binary release? The readme file is here:
>
> http://legendof
(Last top post)
After some reading, I can probably just leave the assets under the current
license. I can simply just change it back since it's currently not released?
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:22:01 +0800
> Subject: Re: Bug#653813: ITP: edgar -- The Legend of Edgar platform game
> From: p...@
"brian m. carlson" writes:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>>
>> > Forty years of pleasant df(1) and mount(1) reading shattered in one day,
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653073
>>
>> Any update on why
* Russ Allbery:
> I'm currently working on the Policy modification to document (and
> recommend) use of symbols instead of shlibs, but I'd only personally used
> symbols with C libraries. Today I decided that I should try adding a
> symbols file to a C++ library, particularly if I'm going to reco
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:57:10AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I don't know if this has been fixed on the FusionForge side, but when I
> was processing collab-maint, this was not the case. Alioth did not send
> out such mails (i.e. when you accepted/declined a join request).
>
> If that's sti
On 2012-01-26 11:51, Richard Sweeney wrote:
> After some reading, I can probably just leave the assets under the current
> license. I can simply just change it back since it's currently not released?
If "current" license is GPL and someone make a fork based on that your
license change in the futu
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Good point, I really assumed that alioth would send you a notification
> mail.
>
> We can try to manually inform people when we accept them, but me being
> one of those that would have to spend time doing it, I would consider
> that to be a useless extra
Le mercredi 25 janvier 2012 à 13:31 +0100, Adrian Knoth a écrit :
> > If you have PolicyKit, rtkit defaults to letting you have rt priorities
> > if and only if you are logged in locally (gdm, kdm, getty etc., but not
>
> Is there something like
>
> "If you're logged in locally, I'll grant y
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:20:15PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Can we have GForge send a notification mail on approval/decline, at
> > least for collab-maint?
>
> FWIW, I opened
> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&group_id=1&aid=304644&atid=21
> in 2007.
>
> I think you'll
On Jue 26 Ene 2012 05:08:07 Sune Vuorela escribió:
[snip]
> >Am I missing some trick to make them useful?
>
> You miss pkgkde-symbolshelper written by the fabulous Modestas Vainius
> which is available in pkg-kde-tools.
>
> http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html
+1. As Sune said in ot
Hi,
I need to install an old package, having a dependency on
libreadline5-dev. This -dev package does no longer exist, it is replaced
by libreadline-gplv2-dev. From the package description that package
conflicts with libreadline5-dev, and replaces libreadline5-dev. Still
the old package refuses to
On 2012-01-26 13:06:31 +0100 (+0100), Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
[...]
> There are several articles about the problem with CC NC licenses,
> exactly what that means is not clear. Make sure to study the field
> before picking anything based on NC.
> Pick license and pick it wise.
The historic qu
Sorry, I just realized I'm not subscribed to debian-deval from the
mailing address below.
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell
Reply-to:
To: debian-devel
Subject: A package question
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:34:18 +0100
Hi,
I need to install an old package, having a depend
* From: Russ Allbery, Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:53:04 -0800
> 4. Once I had a symbols file that resulted in a successful build and
> that I could have uploaded, I started thinking about how I was going
> to maintain it. With a C program, I would change the symbols file
> versions when the underlying func
"Bernhard R. Link" writes:
> How many upstream are there that try to achieve ABI equivalence?
> Usually people only try to achieve ABI compability, i.e. programs
> compiled against the old version will work with the new one, but there
> is no garantee that programs compiled against the new versio
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:08:07AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >Am I missing some trick to make them useful?
>
> You miss pkgkde-symbolshelper written by the fabulous Modestas Vainius
> which is available in pkg-kde-tools.
>
> http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html
I'm currently crea
On 2012-01-26, Thomas Weber wrote:
> I'm currently creating symbol files for Octave in Debian. And quite
> frankly, the way symbol files for C++ libraries are handled and
> (especially) documented is totally frustrating.
>
> There's exactly zero precise documentation on how to maintain symbol
> fi
Jakub Wilk escreveu isso aí:
> * Antonio Terceiro , 2012-01-25, 10:12:
> >Another argument in favor of using the same name for source and
> >binary packages: suppose there is "libfoo", and independent
> >bindings for Perl, Python and Ruby, all called "foo", and that
> >"foo" is unique in their resp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 397 (new: 5)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 151 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
35 matches
Mail list logo
