On Do, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:26:15 (CET), Jérémy Lal wrote: [...]
> About what i wonder (since i'm not c++ expert) if abi-compliance-checker > is serious enough to be used to decide soname bumps ? > http://www.upstream-tracker.org/ Thank you very much for pointing out this service. It surely is very useful for both package maintainers as well as upstreams. I've analyzed the report for libav: http://www.upstream-tracker.org/versions/libav.html and found the results very interesting and enlightning. The results themselves seem very detailed and accurate to me but I think their interpretations of the results is too strong. For libav, most of the incompatible changes are covered by API usage constraints which this automated service cannot possibly be aware of. This means that you have to carefully read all of the report and use the findings with a grain of salt. Cheers, Reinhard -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcny4z7q....@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
