On 18/01/2012 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
> Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
> the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
I personally use:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
debian/copyright
And then manually modify debian/copyright t
* Norbert Preining [120118 03:08]:
> On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Wait, are you patching files inside debian/? That won't fly.
>
> Umpf, and, is that so evil?
One of the problems "3.0 (quilt)" solves is upstream tarballs already
having a debian/ directory. By having the complete debi
On 18/01/12 03:08, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Wait, are you patching files inside debian/? That won't fly.
Umpf, and, is that so evil? Esp for a NMU this is *very* good as it
allows to see what the changes of the NMU are ...
You're supposed to send a debdi
Le Monday 16 January 2012 19:15:07, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> Does a DEP-3 parser exist? And why not?
config-edit -appli dpkg (soon to become 'cme edit dpkg') is able to parse,
modify and save DEP-3 patches ( note that this command also deal with
debian/copyright, debian/control and some other debi
Le Wednesday 18 January 2012 09:03:14, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
> I personally use:
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
> debian/copyright
>
> And then manually modify debian/copyright to compress entries to
> satisfaction.
Oooh, that's a good one. I'll probably
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:03 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
> debian/copyright
That is just what I was looking for, although I doubt I'll be editing
the output, just adding it to my build system, next to where I build the
Debian p
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Peter Miller writes:
>
> > My understanding is that all project files are covered, although
> > wildcards are permitted.
>
> > Each different copyright x license combination needs its own separate
> > entry.
>
> I don't think this is the
Russ Allbery writes:
>> Note that "Copyright (C) 2008 Peter Miller" is different than "Copyright
>> (C) 2011 Peter Miller" is different than "Copyright (C) 1991, 2012 Peter
>> Miller", so the cross product is going to be substantial for long lived
>> projects, even when the number of contributors
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:36:07PM +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Peter Miller writes:
...
> While I'm banging on about semantics, when you are looking up a file by
> name, is it the first file name pattern match that applies, or the last,
>
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:03:14PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
> On 18/01/2012 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
> > Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
> > the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
>
> I personally use:
> $ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/lic
On 12-01-18 at 08:31pm, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:03:14PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
> > On 18/01/2012 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
> > > Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
> > > the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
> >
> > I personally
On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It would be nice if you could avoid the "flaming tone" in all your mails.
> In particular since most of the time it ends up being a mistake of yours.
And it would be nice if dpkg-buildpackage gives a decent error message.
What is shipped here is plain i
Hi Norbert (2012.01.18_15:18:27_+0200)
> Since we are at quilt 3.0 bashing: Maybe you can give me a rational
> why I *ALWAYS* have to type in
> export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
> before working with debian source packages?
Because you haven't set up a .quiltrc? The maint-guide has a reall
On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Because you haven't set up a .quiltrc? The maint-guide has a really nice
> example you can steal.
Ugg, and call dquilt or quilt --quiltrc=... yeah
I will try to remember that, and will forget it as well as I forget
setting QUILT_PATCHES
Thanks, that was
Norbert Preining (18/01/2012):
> On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > It would be nice if you could avoid the "flaming tone" in all your mails.
> > In particular since most of the time it ends up being a mistake of yours.
>
> And it would be nice if dpkg-buildpackage gives a decent erro
* Norbert Preining , 2012-01-18, 22:18:
Since we are at quilt 3.0 bashing: Maybe you can give me a rational why
I *ALWAYS* have to type in
export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
before working with debian source packages? And when I forget it I get
hurt by quilt?
dpkg (>= 1.15.8.6) crea
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 12/22/2011 07:07 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
>> It seems to me that wanting to have / outside LVM but /usr inside LVM is a
>> fairly obscure corner case.
> I have about 100 servers setup this way, and my laptops as well. I really
> don't see why this would be a corner ca
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> Forty years of pleasant df(1) and mount(1) reading shattered in one day,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653073
Any update on why the root filesystem is listed by UUID? Is that a
problem of busybox mount reporting the long device name to the kernel
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > It would be nice if you could avoid the "flaming tone" in all your mails.
> > In particular since most of the time it ends up being a mistake of yours.
>
> And it would be nice if dpkg-buildpackage gives
clone 653073 -1
retitle -1 df: [patch] Please ignore rootfs in df output
reassign -1 coreutils
thanks
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>
> > Forty years of pleasant df(1) and mount(1) reading shattered in one day,
> > http://bugs.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Wait, are you patching files inside debian/? That won't fly.
I've personally missed this feature for a package I need to patch
outside of Debian. When it was dpkg-source v1 I could just drop in the
patches/series and everything would work. Now
"Alan Curry" writes:
> jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>>
>> Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed
>> Available Use% Mounted on
>> rootfs 1071468 287940
>> 729100 29% /
>> /dev/disk/by-uuid/551e44e1-2ca
Ted Ts'o writes:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:38:11PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:13:29PM +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>> > Simon McVittie writes:
>> >
>> > > life's too short to spend time booting in single-user mode and
>> > > resizing LVs.
>> >
>> > Th
Joachim Breitner writes:
> Dear devel,
>
> I have an interesting case for a hypothetical âsource package without
> binary packagesâ: The haskell compiler comes with an extensive test
> suite. This test suite
> 1. is distributed separately from the sources,
> 2. takes a long time to
"Thijs Kinkhorst" writes:
> On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until
>>> now.
>>
>> It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/642801
>
> My experience until now is that it's ma
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:24:22 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> > Wait, are you patching files inside debian/? That won't fly.
>
> I've personally missed this feature for a package I need to patch
> outside of Debian.
This is something I'll need to
Norbert Preining writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> maybe its just me, but I cannot get the hang of that 3.0 (quilt)
> and pre/post applying patches.
>
> Recently I prepared a NMU for less to finally fix the missing xz(tar.xz)
> support, added a new patch, but it is *impossible* for me to build
> a packa
-=| Adam Borowski, 07.01.2012 13:02:28 +0100 |=-
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:32:20PM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> > * Package name: xul-ext-debianbuttons
> > * URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/debian-buttons/
> > Description : Buttons for querying Debian-relate
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:35:23PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Norbert Preining , 2012-01-18, 22:18:
> >Since we are at quilt 3.0 bashing: Maybe you can give me a
> >rational why I *ALWAYS* have to type in
> > export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
> >before working with debian source packages?
Pushing this towards debian-project, which is where the DEP-5 discussion
is supposed to happen.
Peter Miller writes:
> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
> "Files paragraph (Repeatable)
>
> "The declaration of copyright and license for files is done in
> one or mo
Norbert Preining writes:
> On Mi, 18 Jan 2012, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>> Because you haven't set up a .quiltrc? The maint-guide has a really
>> nice example you can steal.
> Ugg, and call dquilt or quilt --quiltrc=... yeah
> I will try to remember that, and will forget it as well as I forget
> se
* Dominique Dumont , 2012-01-18, 10:41:
Does a DEP-3 parser exist? And why not?
config-edit -appli dpkg (soon to become 'cme edit dpkg') is able to
parse, modify and save DEP-3 patches ( note that this command also deal
with debian/copyright, debian/control and some other debian files).
Huh?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 16 janvier 2012 à 18:07 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > I think the DPL should appoint a dictator who will rule on when
> > consensus has been achieved on a DEP.
(I originally interpreted this as being enclosed within t
I pray my mail gets to you this time. I'd write you on two occasions
concerning your assistance to help certify a piece of document due to some
similarities in location with the supposed care-taker to enable a safe transfer
of securities proceeds money out of Turkey. Please let me know if you
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:35:23PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Norbert Preining , 2012-01-18, 22:18:
> > >Since we are at quilt 3.0 bashing: Maybe you can give me a
> > >rational why I *ALWAYS* have to type in
> > > export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/
On 01/18/12 06:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> What df should do is automatically skip the entries that are obscured or
> generally inaccessible.
Isn't this missing some of the larger context? df is just doing what
lots of other programs do: finding out what file systems one has,
and reporting
Le Wednesday 18 January 2012 18:41:44, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> >config-edit -appli dpkg (soon to become 'cme edit dpkg') is able to
> >parse, modify and save DEP-3 patches ( note that this command also deal
> >with debian/copyright, debian/control and some other debian files).
>
> Huh? What has d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf
* Package name: ruby-ntlm-http
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Kohei Kajimoto, Kingsley Hendrickse
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubyntlm
* License : Ruby
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf
* Package name: ruby-webrobots
Version : 0.0.12
Upstream Author : Akinori MUSHA
* URL : https://github.com/knu/webrobots
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Library for creating robot
* Dominique Dumont , 2012-01-18, 19:37:
https://metacpan.org/source/DDUMONT/Config-Model-1.265/lib/Config/Model/Backend/Debian/Dpkg/Patch.pm
Judging by a quick look, it doesn't support dpatch patches[0] or
pseudo-headers[0][1].
[0] Don't ask what are these "features" good for. But they are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf
* Package name: ruby-ntlm
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Kohei Kajimoto
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubyntlm
* License : Ruby
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Pure Ruby implementation
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>
> > Forty years of pleasant df(1) and mount(1) reading shattered in one day,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653073
>
> Any update on why the root filesystem is listed by UUI
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:02:03PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> >
> > > Forty years of pleasant df(1) and mount(1) reading shattered in one day,
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Le Wednesday 18 January 2012 18:41:44, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
>> And how do I use this parser? I want something as simple as: for a given
>> patch, check if the header complies to DEP-3 and if it does, dump it in
>> some machine-readable for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Dennis van Dok (Software Engineer)"
* Package name: trustmanager
Version : 3.0.5
Upstream Author : Joni Hahkala
* URL : https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/TrustManager
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Ja
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:13:34PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> The above notwithstanding, we can probably learn from this thread that,
> for the future, it would help to first announce "I'm about to mark
> DEP-$x as ACCEPTED" and then doing that. I personally don't think it is
> a big
Charles Plessy writes:
> I do not intend to push a document on which persons disagree, so please,
> if you think that there are serious problems with the current wording
> DEP 5, or if you found an important bug in its syntax, report it to the
> BTS.
I reported what I think are problems with the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael van der Kolff
* Package name: jbigkit
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Markus Kuhn
* URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/jbigkit/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : JBIG-KIT is a library
48 matches
Mail list logo
