On 01/18/12 06:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > What df should do is automatically skip the entries that are obscured or > generally inaccessible.
Isn't this missing some of the larger context? df is just doing what lots of other programs do: finding out what file systems one has, and reporting statistics on them. It sounds suboptimal to require the maintainers of all these programs (coreutils, nautilus, etc.) to rewrite their apps to deal with obscured entries. Surely it would be better to have the kernel ordinarily return just the ordinary entries, and to return obscured entries only when they are specially requested. That way, this issue would be isolated to the few bits of code that really want to see obscured entries. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f170b94.3010...@cs.ucla.edu
