Hi,
3GHSUPA/HSDPA/EVDO Wireless USB Modem,factory OEM service.
Kind regards,
Tinty
Sunrise Tech Group Limited
www.sunrisechina.biz
T: +86-755-28894365 23943658
F: +86-755-29014855
E:ti...@sunrisechina.biz
* jida...@jidanni.org [2011-03-12 11:14 +0800]:
> Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
> S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
> keystrokes, only to receive
>
> >I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
> >http://www.debian.org/MailingLis
Hi,
we have disabled the contents generator of apt-ftparchive and replaced
it by a new implementation in dak. There are some visible changes:
1) Contents-udeb.gz and Contents-udeb-nf.gz are now available under
their canonical names main/Contents-amd64.gz and non-free/Contents-amd64.gz.
2) The e
Hi,
On Samstag, 12. März 2011, Torsten Werner wrote:
> The new implementation is currently only used for suites that are not
> marked as untouchable. Oldstable and stable will switch during the next
> point release.
Why switch stable and oldstable at all?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: wxsvg
Version : 1.0.8
Upstream Author : Alex Thuering
* URL : http://wxsvg.sf.net
* License : GPL, wxWindows
Programming Lang: C++
Description : SVG library for the wxWidgets toolk
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:01:21AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> we have disabled the contents generator of apt-ftparchive and replaced
> it by a new implementation in dak. There are some visible changes:
>
[Contents.gz]
>
> 2) The encoding in proper UTF-8. ISO8859-1 filenames are re-coded
> aut
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Why switch stable and oldstable at all?
Why not? Should we maintain two different configurations for several
years for no obvious reason?
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:25:32 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Samstag, 12. März 2011, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > The new implementation is currently only used for suites that are not
> > marked as untouchable. Oldstable and stable will switch during the next
> > point release.
>
> Why
Hi Torsten,
On Samstag, 12. März 2011, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > Why switch stable and oldstable at all?
> Why not? Should we maintain two different configurations for several
> years for no obvious reason?
well, the obvious reason is to not break Debian stable (and oldstable), like
it happened
Am Freitag, den 11.03.2011, 00:18 +0100 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:15:22PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > James Vega seems to be the most active devscripts maintainer these days,
> > and he does this (as far as I know) in his spare time. If he does not
> > want to have
Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 14:34 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Also, considering we are talking about Python and not, say, my beloved
> > OCaml, I wouldn't be surprised to discover that among active Debian
> > developers we have now
Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 08/03/2011 23:01, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >
> > check-symbols
>
> I always hated programs that do "sudo" (and even more those doing it
> *twice*). And, isn't just unpacking the .deb and checking for ".so"
> there enough? You cou
* Carsten Hey [2011-03-12 10:50 +0100]:
> There are examples where we lost potential future maintainers because
> they never received a reply to an RFS. These replies were sent to the
> list, but they were not sent to those requesting sponsorship.
To clarify this: the problem was not that Mail-Fo
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to
> squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing
> the tzdata update in tomorrow morning.
Unfortunately, that didn't happen yet. Adding packages to
> "JV" == James Vega writes:
JV> As for #616489, that doesn't make any sense. How can apt know the hash sums
JV> don't match if it hasn't downloaded the file in order to compute the hash
sum
JV> for comparison?
I don't know. All I know is it also seems to happen at ftp.us.debian.org too.
W
...and when it happens it takes out apt's index files for several hours
# apt-cache policy coreutils
coreutils:
Installed: 8.5-1
Candidate: 8.5-1
Version table:
*** 8.5-1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:01:21AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
>
> 5) Packages with duplicate filenames are marked just as such and no
> contents is recorded, e.g.
> DUPLICATE_FILENAMES text/inorwegian,text/wnorwegian
So basicly apt-file search will fail to find any file in
inorwegian a
* Torsten Werner , 2011-03-12, 11:01:
2) The encoding in proper UTF-8. ISO8859-1 filenames are re-coded
automatically. To find out what happens to other encodings is left as an
exercise to the reader. :)
What's the point of messing with encodings?
5) Packages with duplicate filenames are mark
Is there a process for a prospective Debian developer to adopt a package that's
not been updated for a long time?
I know the current package maintainer can file an RFA, or orphan the package,
but is there a process for a new
maintainer to take the package over if the current maintainer doesn't
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 05:50:26PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> > (i.e. list of mirrors somewhere on ftp.d.o).
> >>
> >> We hav
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:30:05 +
roy hills wrote:
>
> Is there a process for a prospective Debian developer to adopt a
> package that's not been updated for a long time?
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa
> I know the current package maintainer can file
]] Jakub Wilk
| * Torsten Werner , 2011-03-12, 11:01:
| >2) The encoding in proper UTF-8. ISO8859-1 filenames are re-coded
| >automatically. To find out what happens to other encodings is left as an
| >exercise to the reader. :)
|
| What's the point of messing with encodings?
Probably make it p
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to
> > squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing
> > the tzdata update in tomorrow mor
On 2011-03-12, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Jakub Wilk
>| * Torsten Werner , 2011-03-12, 11:01:
>| >2) The encoding in proper UTF-8. ISO8859-1 filenames are re-coded
>| >automatically. To find out what happens to other encodings is left as an
>| >exercise to the reader. :)
>| What's the point of m
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:57:29PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
[...]
> How should new people know that they don't get a copy of replies
> to their messages unless they explicitly request one?
Maybe it's a generational difference... as I expect did authors of
the code of conduct, I came up on bulleti
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:30:03PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Jakub Wilk
> | Shouldn't dak reject debs with duplicate filenames in the first place?
>
> No, packages might very well ship duplicate files (think all mtas
> shipping /usr/sbin/sendmail) but they then have to conflict + replac
Simon Paillard wrote:
> Today the list is available in the following formats:
> - today's master source rfc822:
> http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/webwml/english/mirror/Mirrors.masterlist (used
> by d-i choose-mirror)
> - YAML after
> http://teubr.eu.org/~spaillar/debian/qamirrors/Mirror-list-to-y
Hi,
I'm cc-ing to debian-devel since I expect others are wondering about
the Boost status.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> 1.42 still appears to be the latest version available in Debian (unstable).
> Could 1.46.1 be uploaded?
I assume you're
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmousex-strictconstructor-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Fuji, Goro (gfx)
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mo
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> So basicly apt-file search will fail to find any file in
> inorwegian and wnorwegian?
It won't find any files currently for both packages.
> Why? What's wrong with the old way of doing it?
Both packages ship symlinks with the same name but
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 07:53:34PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > So basicly apt-file search will fail to find any file in
> > inorwegian and wnorwegian?
>
> It won't find any files currently for both packages.
$ apt-file search bokmaal.aff
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-www-mechanize-mojo-perl
Version : 0.0.8
Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-WWW-Mech
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Valroff
* Package name: unhide.rb
Upstream Author : Johan Walles
* URL : http://code.launchpad.net/unhide.rb
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Forensic tool to find processes hidden by rootkits
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> $ apt-file search bokmaal.aff
> inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmaal.aff
> $ apt-file search bokmål.aff
> inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmål.aff
$ zgrep inorwegian Contents-amd64.gz
DUPLICATE_FILENAMES
text/inorwegian,text/wnorwegian
Are you u
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > $ apt-file search bokmaal.aff
> > inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmaal.aff
> > $ apt-file search bokmål.aff
> > inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmål.aff
>
> $ zgrep inorwegian Co
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:06:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > $ apt-file search bokmaal.aff
> > > inorwegian: /usr/lib/ispell/bokmaal.aff
> > > $ apt-file search bokmål.af
Package: wnpp
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libfile-listing-perl
Version : 6.00
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Listing/
* Licens
Package: wnpp
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libnet-http-perl
Version : 6.00
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-HTTP/
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdbix-class-deploymenthandler-perl
Version : 0.001004
Upstream Author : Arthur Axel Schmidt
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/di
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libnet-jabber-bot-perl
Version : 2.1.5
Upstream Author : Todd Rinaldo
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Jabber-Bot/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descrip
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
> the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the list behaviour currently
(leave the Reply-To field untouched) is
41 matches
Mail list logo
