]] Jakub Wilk | * Torsten Werner <[email protected]>, 2011-03-12, 11:01: | >2) The encoding in proper UTF-8. ISO8859-1 filenames are re-coded | >automatically. To find out what happens to other encodings is left as an | >exercise to the reader. :) | | What's the point of messing with encodings?
Probably make it predictable for tools trying to consume the file. | >5) Packages with duplicate filenames are marked just as such and no | >contents is recorded, e.g. | >DUPLICATE_FILENAMES text/inorwegian,text/wnorwegian | | Shouldn't dak reject debs with duplicate filenames in the first place? No, packages might very well ship duplicate files (think all mtas shipping /usr/sbin/sendmail) but they then have to conflict + replace. | Anyway, both packages are just fine (AFAICT). Reporting them as having | duplicate filenames looks like a side effect of encoding mangling: Yeah, I should probably stop shipping the latin1 version, now, though. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
