Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
reassign 603767 general thanks Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit : > After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even > after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected > behaviour. I noticed this happens often to me too, and I ca

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, The reason spice is still using celt-0.5.1 is that celt as a protocol / format is considered not finished yet by celt upstream and thus the bitstream format may change (and does change) with every new upstream release. In order to provide compatibility between different spice client and serv

Processed: Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 603767 general Bug #603767 [gdm] gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7 Bug reassigned from package 'gdm' to 'general'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 603767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread dave b
> I noticed this happens often to me too, and I can assure you it’s not a > GDM bug. The Linux VT interface wrongly reports vt7 as being in use, > before gdm is even started. It does not happen on all systems, so it > might be related to KMS - for example it happens with my radeon-based > system. >

Re: Bug#603672: ITP: navi2ch -- 2ch Navigator for Emacs

2010-11-17 Thread Takaya Yamashita
retitle 603672 ITP: navi2ch -- Navigator for "2ch-style" web forum sites which works on Emacs stop On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:41:50 -0400 David Bremner wrote: > > * Package name: navi2ch > > Version : 1.8.3 > > Upstream Author : Taiki SUGAWARA > > * URL or Web page : http://navi2ch.

Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:36:14AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit : > > After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even > > after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected > > behaviour. > > I

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 11:45:05 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Screenshots on packages.d.o > --- > > You may have noticed that packages.d.o now includes screenshots[1] > with a link to a the Debian screenshots site[2]. Where a screenshot > isn't available a "No screensh

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller wrote: > I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a > screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be > possible to exclude the screenshot feature for such packages? It always > takes some time to find the

Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread dave b
I am using gdm and not gdm3. If you can give me more details as to why you think it is a kernel bug that would be good ^ ^ (also the ordering of this bug report on the website rather weird...) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a > > screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be > > possible to exclude the screenshot featu

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > Why does the "no screenshot available" message need to be an image? If > no screenshot is available why not insert the relevant text instead? Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or not. To do that it would need

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:42:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example). > > The problem is that there is no reliable way to differentiate between > packages that it is appropriate to have a screenshot for and those > that should never have a screen

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:42:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example). The Debian Pure Blends web sentinel has this screenshot feature for some time and we stumbled upon the same question (without having a reasonable solution). To some extend the p

Re: source package format 3.0 with multiple tar balls

2010-11-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Norbert Preining writes: > Hi Paul, > > thanks for the answer. > > On So, 14 Nov 2010, Paul Wise wrote: >> $ tar tf luatex-beta-0.64.0-doc.tar.bz2 | head -n2 >> luatex-beta-0.64.0/manual/ >> luatex-beta-0.64.0/manual/graphics/ >> >> So the manual/manual thing comes from the orig.tar suffix plus

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Ron
Hi Hans, Hans de Goede writes: > The if at all part depends on if it will be doable without too much > pain to support both celt-0.5.1 and celt "1.0" in the same binary. > This is important to us as we care a lot about protocol > compatibility. Are you seriously telling me that you have no plan

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2010-11-17, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller wrote: > >> I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a >> screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be >> possible to exclude the screenshot feature for such packages? I

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or > not. To do that it would need to regularly download the screenshots > metadata and make use of it. Patches welcome if anyone wants to > implement it. I have no idea

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:34:54PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example). > > I don't really see why these packages warrants screenshots. their look > is fully dependant on the chosen style (and the two mentioned, GTK+ and > Qt can actually look e

screenshots.d.n (was: Misc Developer News (#24))

2010-11-17 Thread Simon Paillard
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:45:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or > > not. To do that it would need to regularly download the screenshots > > metadata and make use of

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2010-11-17, Andreas Tille wrote: > This argument is true for any application using GTK+ or Qt - would you > conclude that also in this case a screenshot is not warranted? IMHO No. e.g. seenig the layout of a editor, the structure of a IDE, the appearance of a instant message program, ... /Su

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 12:34 +, Sune Vuorela a écrit : > On 2010-11-17, Paul Wise wrote: > > Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example). > > I don't really see why these packages warrants screenshots. their look > is fully dependant on the chosen style (and the two ment

Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I have been working on a piuparts rewrite that makes it easier to find install/removal/upgrade bugs. When running it on all packages in squeeze, I'm currently getting 682 failures. That doesn't mean 682 RC bugs, because some of the failures are caused by bugs in other packages, or only exhibit

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/17/2010 01:04 PM, Ron wrote: Hi Hans, Hans de Goede writes: The if at all part depends on if it will be doable without too much pain to support both celt-0.5.1 and celt "1.0" in the same binary. This is important to us as we care a lot about protocol compatibility. Are you serious

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Lucas, thanks for the tests, I think this is much appreciated. I checked my package install-info and that was a false positive, the removal test failed - of course - becasue install-info is an essential package, so removing it needs typing in Yes, do as I say! ;-) Again, thanks for d

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/11/10 at 23:50 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > thanks for the tests, I think this is much appreciated. > > I checked my package install-info and that was a false positive, > the removal test failed - of course - becasue install-info is > an essential package, so removing it

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Lucas, On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I'm looking for people willing to work on such tools and mass bug > filings (that also include archive rebuilds). I'm getting a bit tired of > working on that myself, and might stop after squeeze. Understandable. Please dont stop

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
[Debian Edu people please read below at /education-/] Hi Lucas, thanks for all your QA efforts! On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:37:17AM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > [1] http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/ > Full dd-list (binary packages): > --- > > An

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-11-17 15:50 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > I checked my package install-info and that was a false positive, > the removal test failed - of course - becasue install-info is > an essential package, so removing it needs typing in > Yes, do as I say! Or rather apt treats install-info

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 11/17/10 13:04, Ron wrote: Hi Hans, Hans de Goede writes: The if at all part depends on if it will be doable without too much pain to support both celt-0.5.1 and celt "1.0" in the same binary. Should work without major trouble, the symbols exported by the shared library have a versioned

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, Andreas Tille wrote: > >education-desktop-kde (U) > >education-thin-client (U) > >education-thin-client-server (U) > >education-workstation (U) > I have looked into these logs and think they are caused by dependant > packages. The only probable

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi 2010/11/17 Ron : > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> On 11/17/10 13:04, Ron wrote: > Why not just let systems negotiate the best codec they both know? That was a bit my goal with this patch: http://gitorious.org/~elmarco/spice/elmarco-spice/commit/e310493a3e5a28

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:36:14AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 13:47 +1100, david b a écrit : > > After upgrading from lenny to squeeze, gdm starts on vt8 always (even > > after restarting it). It should start on vt7 as this is the expected > I noticed this happe

Re: Misc Developer News (#24)

2010-11-17 Thread The Fungi
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:21:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] > To some extend the problem also exists for several command line > applications. [...] > To implement this idea we should probably define a reasonable > default xterm to get some consistency and put this information in > the usag

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Ron
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 11/17/10 13:04, Ron wrote: > >Are you seriously telling me that you have no plan whatsoever for how > >to transition from a random snapshot of an experimental codec, > > We can transition just fine. server + client can signal sup

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
> Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce > this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue > does only show up with GDM. And it does never show up when starting GDM > the first time after boot, GDM needs to be stopped and started again for >

Re: [Spice-devel] Bug#603699: ITP: celt051 -- The CELT codec v0.5.1

2010-11-17 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, If you don't want package celt 0.5.1 -- fine. You can patch your spice server and client to just not signal the celt capability, and they will interoperate just fine with everybody else using raw uncompressed audio. But IMHO it would be stupid to not support audio compression in your spi

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 17:15 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a écrit : > Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce > this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue > does only show up with GDM. And it does never show up when starting GDM

Re: Minutes of the Debian linux-2.6 Group Meeting

2010-11-17 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:52:12PM +, maximilian attems wrote: [...] > Automated tests > --- > > This is a pressing task, we should know sooner if the specific > branch compiles and boots. > > waldi shouts for reprepro, sbuild and wannbuild. Build server > needed between 6-12 hour

Bug#603828: ITP: ocaml-data-notation -- Store data using OCaml notation

2010-11-17 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvain Le Gall * Package name: ocaml-data-notation Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Sylvain Le Gall * URL : http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/odn * License : LGPL-2.1 with OCaml linking exception Programming Lang:

Bug#603829: ITP: ocaml-expect -- Expect-like framework in OCaml

2010-11-17 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvain Le Gall * Package name: ocaml-expect Version : 0.0.2 Upstream Author : Sylvain Le Gall * URL : http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/ocaml-expect/ * License : LGPL-2.1 with OCaml linking exception Programming Lan

Bug#603830: ITP: oasis -- Architecture for building OCaml libraries and applications

2010-11-17 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvain Le Gall * Package name: oasis Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Sylvain Le Gall * URL : http://oasis.forge.ocamlcore.org/ * License : LGPL-2.1 with OCaml linking exception Programming Lang: OCaml Description

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/11/10 at 16:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > [Debian Edu people please read below at /education-/] > Hi Lucas, > > thanks for all your QA efforts! > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:37:17AM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > [1] http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/ > > > > Ful

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Russ Allbery >libpam-afs-session >libpam-openafs-kaserver >openafs-client >openafs-dbg >openafs-dbserver >openafs-fileserver >openafs-kpasswd >openafs-modules-dkms Bug in dpkg. Nothing that the openafs packages can do anything about so f

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/11/10 at 10:48 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > > Russ Allbery > >libpam-afs-session > >libpam-openafs-kaserver > >openafs-client > >openafs-dbg > >openafs-dbserver > >openafs-fileserver > >openafs-kpasswd > >openafs-modules-dkms > >

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Lucas Nussbaum writes: > On 17/11/10 at 10:48 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Lucas Nussbaum writes: >>> Russ Allbery >>>libpam-afs-session >>>libpam-openafs-kaserver >>>openafs-client >>>openafs-dbg >>>openafs-dbserver >>>openafs-fileserver >>>openafs-kpasswd >>>o

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Russ Allbery >libsaml2-dev (U) >libshibsp-dev (U) >libxml-security-c-dev (U) >libxmltooling-dev (U) These are all the same problem, I think, but I don't understand the problem. It's an inability to upgrade from lenny to squeeze that's blocking because o

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> > I checked for cimg-dev in > > > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/cimg-dev.log > > > > and found only one hint of a failure when it says: > > > > -- New version is unstable version: FAILED (UNINSTALLED != 1.3.9-1) > > > > but from reasing the log I can not find any hint for this

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:01:53PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 17:15 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe a > écrit : > > Well, to me, it does indeed appear to be a GDM bug: I can not reproduce > > this permanent VT allocation with either KDM, XDM or startx. The issue

Bug#603836: ITP: libtext-tags-perl -- parses "folksonomy" space-separated tags

2010-11-17 Thread Axel Beckert
Package: wnpp Owner: Axel Beckert Severity: wishlist * Package name: libtext-tags-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : David Glasser * URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Tags/ * License : Artistic Description : parses "folksonomy" space-separated ta

Re: Bug#603711: ITP: ga -- Global Arrays Toolkit

2010-11-17 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:44:45 + brian m. carlson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:35:30PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: [...] > > - Other than as used herein, neither the name Battelle Memorial Institute > >or Battelle may be used in any form whatsoever without the express > >written

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I checked for cimg-dev in > > > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/cimg-dev.log > > > > and found only one hint of a failure when it says: > > > > -- New version is unstable version: FAILED (UNINSTALLED != 1.3.9-1

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 21:33 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > So, that one is an interesting case, and there are several occurences of > > this. It might be a problem in APT. What happens is that, if you install > > cimg-d

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/11/10 at 21:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 21:33 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > So, that one is an interesting case, and there are several occurences of > > > this. It might be a pro

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:33:52 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > It seems that after installation of dict-wn, there's a process that is still > > running, so destroying the chroot fails. > > I'm quoting the relevant part of dict-wn po

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-11-17 22:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:33:52 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> > It seems that after installation of dict-wn, there's a process that is >> > still >> > running, so destroying the ch

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread James Vega
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:33:52 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28:54PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> > It seems that after installation of dict-wn, there's a process that is >> > still >> > running, so destroying

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:37:38PM -0500, James Vega wrote: > >> I'm quoting the relevant part of dict-wn postinst resp. postrm: > > > >>     remove|purge) > >>         if [ -x /usr/sbin/dictdconfig ]; then dictdconfig -w ;fi > >> > >>         # if [ -x /etc/init.d/dictd ]; then /etc/init.d/dictd r

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Harald Jenny
Hello Lucas, concerning the openswan* packages: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan.log: Configuration file `/etc/ipsec.conf' ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/11/10 at 22:34 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > Hello Lucas, > > concerning the openswan* packages: > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan.log: > >Configuration file `/etc/ipsec.conf' > ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. > ==> Package dis

Installation manual review for kFreeBSD needed!

2010-11-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, The current kfreebsd version of the installation manual is lacking review: a lot of things have been fixed (e.g. "Linux" doesn't appear where it shouldn't), but quite a few things still need to be fixed, and we need kfreebsd-knowledgeable people to provide information. Basically, the whole

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread dave b
So what's kind of why i asked about how you were trying to find the bug. Don't tell me to search through lots of C code point it out! I don't have time for that and you seemed to know more! We so then the question is what happens if it is 'busy' and we attempt to use it anyways ;) ? -- To UNSUBS

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

2010-11-17 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 22:36:42 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-11-17 22:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > It's restarting (instead of stoppping) on remove/purge. > > Could you elaborate? Surely a dictionary package should not stop the > dictionary server when it is being removed, should it?

Re: Bug#603767: gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7

2010-11-17 Thread Stephen Powell
This appears to be a duplicate of 596700. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1758119783.480227

Re: Bug#603534: ITP: xf86-input-multitouch -- Multitouch X input driver

2010-11-17 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2010/11/15 Julien Cristau : > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:12:52 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > >> Package: wnpp >> Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu >> Severity: wishlist >> >> *** Please type your report below this line *** >> >> * Package name    : xf86-input-multitouch >>   Version         : 1.0~