On 17/11/10 at 22:34 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > Hello Lucas, > > concerning the openswan* packages: > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan.log: > > Configuration file `/etc/ipsec.conf' > ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. > ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. > What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: > Y or I : install the package maintainer's version > N or O : keep your currently-installed version > D : show the differences between the versions > Z : background this process to examine the situation > The default action is to keep your current version. > *** ipsec.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing openswan > (--configure): > EOF on stdin at conffile prompt > . > . > . > Errors were encountered while processing: > openswan > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > I guess this problem arises because we need user input here, correct?
Yes, but you shouldn't, since the file installed in lenny was not modified, so it's a bug somewhere. > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan-modules-dkms.log: > > dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 (--remove): > subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 > . > . > . > Errors were encountered while processing: > linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > And here it's the already mentioned kernel issue, am I right? Right - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101118001128.ga21...@xanadu.blop.info
