On 12164 March 1977, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
> even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
> NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
> acceptet).
Check again, this i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: trophime
* Package name: getdp-sparskit
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Christophe Geuzaine
* URL : http://www.geuz.org/getdp
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : general environment for the t
Am 02.07.2010 08:57, schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
>>> The above URL has the license. I think that the concepts in the preamble
>>> are
>>> interesting, offering software to please Allah and denying the concept of
>>> "ownership" of Intellectual Property.
>> Which is not only non-free in Debian, we ca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: debian-gis
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Petter Reinholdtsen , Andreas Tille
* URL : native package
* License : GPL
Description : Set of Blends metapackages for Debian GIS
The s
On 07/02/2010 12:53 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 00:39 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> The software is meant for non-free. Why it should be rejected?
>> Even non-free stuff has to pass NEW for the first upload…
> See points (1-4) from my original post, which are not cha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Konstantin Khomoutov
* Package name: tdbc
Version : 1.0b14
Upstream Author : Kevin B. Kenny
The Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://tdbc.tcl.tk/
* License : (custom, BSD-like)
Programming Lang: (C, Tcl)
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 01:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> You're looking for tmpfs and pivot_root. The latter is a hack that's needed
> only because of kernel threads, if you're the only process chroot() and
> chdir() should be enough.
Of course,.. I rather meant,.. whether there are chances that
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:48 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> You seem to have missed some funny licenses already used in the non-free
> area.
> As an example, did you read
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html ?
It's funny... yes... but there is no discriminatory or similar cont
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:05 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Check again, this is meant for non-free, not main.
Still do not see how this would change anything... well of course rules
may say that we may put anything into non-free if it's distributable,...
but then we need some better rules.
> Oh su
On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html ?
> It's funny... yes... but there is no discriminatory or similar content
> in it.
Huh? It clearly discriminates evil-doers!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
>> Oh suure. "We are all about freedom, but please no religional
>> stuff. Oh, and while we are at, get away with porn. And alcohol is bad
>> too, anything that can help people there, get away."
>> Thats not how it works, we c
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:12 +0430, Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah
wrote:
> > I guess it's quite easy for to judge things like this using common
> > sense...
> I don't think my common sense is anything near yours. Isn't Debian
> supposed to be for all of us?
Well... then apparently at least not fo
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:12:55 +0430, Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
> wrote:
>>> Oh suure. "We are all about freedom, but please no religional
>>> stuff. Oh, and while we are at, get away with porn. And alcohol is bad
>>> too,
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 13:25 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer a
écrit :
> > > 4) The license is extremely anti-American, and I guess also
> > > anti-European/anti-Western.
> > Doesnt matter.
> Although you may be right from the what allows non-free point of view,..
> but in all doing respect,
Dear reporter,
initrd@comcast.net schrieb am 02.07.2010 08:35:
> After digging for support for Razer Gaming Mice for the past year, I came
> across a project that supports a number of Razer mice and and uses pyqt4 for
> the interface. This is a great tool and as I have noticed not just the numb
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:12:55 +0430, Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
>> wrote:
Oh suure. "We are all about freedom, but please no religional
stuff. Oh, and w
Hi,
first of all, I'm really sorry for filling 23 bugs without discussing
this here.
This started as Kyle (Cc) filled #585767 because some packages failed to
build on powerpcspe (not official, in debian-ports atm). The gnu
triplet there is powerpc-linux-gnuspe so type-handling provides
not+linux-g
On 07/02/2010 06:33 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html ?
It's funny... yes... but there is no discriminatory or similar content
in it.
Huh? It clearly discriminates evil-doers!
I *thin
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 16:01:01 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This started as Kyle (Cc) filled #585767 because some packages failed to
> build on powerpcspe (not official, in debian-ports atm). The gnu
> triplet there is powerpc-linux-gnuspe so type-handling provides
> not+linux-gnu.
>> Check again, this is meant for non-free, not main.
> Still do not see how this would change anything... well of course rules
> may say that we may put anything into non-free if it's distributable,...
> but then we need some better rules.
Every DD can start a GR to change the rules. To drop non
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 10:48 -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> Policy only allows these wildcards for the build-time fields. In
> libgnomevfs2-dev (subject of bug 587877), it is a regular Depends:, and
> your wildcard solution will not work.
>
> Unless, that is, dpkg-gencontrol expands th
[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
> Since Debian-Policy 3.9.0 architecture wild cards are allowed so this
> dependency would become
> libudev-dev (>= 0.139) [linux-any]
> and the type-handling aliases (which are hack according to #585767)
> could go. Based on this and the fact that some packages are al
On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Huh? It clearly discriminates evil-doers!
> I *think* that's sarcasm, but not sure...
No. Why?
What $you think is evil $I might think is not. So if $you discriminate
evil-doing, you discriminate $me.
I dont get why one discrimination of use cases
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 19:42 +0200, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Huh? It clearly discriminates evil-doers!
> > I *think* that's sarcasm, but not sure...
>
> No. Why?
>
> What $you think is evil $I might think is not. So if $you discriminate
* Julien Cristau | 2010-07-02 16:20:24 [+0100]:
>> This started as Kyle (Cc) filled #585767 because some packages failed to
>> build on powerpcspe (not official, in debian-ports atm). The gnu
>> triplet there is powerpc-linux-gnuspe so type-handling provides
>> not+linux-gnu. This is also the case
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Banka
* Package name: bombardier-core-1.00
Version : 1.0.762
Upstream Author : Peter Banka
* URL : http://www.bombardierinstaller.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Open Source Con
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:05:52AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Oh suure. "We are all about freedom, but please no religional
> stuff. Oh, and while we are at, get away with porn. And alcohol is bad
> too, anything that can help people there, get away."
> Thats not how it works, we cant as
Hey
Well I guess that it's much easier to judge what's evil and what's not.
Typically all peoples that took part in the Enlightenment a scientific
development came to similar rules, which you can find things like:
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- European Convention on Human Rights
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>
* Package name: jme
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : jME Team
* URL : http://www.jmonkeyengine.com
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : high performance scene
"Christoph Anton Mitterer" wrote:
>Hey
>
>Well I guess that it's much easier to judge what's evil and what's not.
>
>Typically all peoples that took part in the Enlightenment a scientific
>development came to similar rules, which you can find things like:
>- Universal Declaration of Human R
30 matches
Mail list logo
