On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:05 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Check again, this is meant for non-free, not main. Still do not see how this would change anything... well of course rules may say that we may put anything into non-free if it's distributable,... but then we need some better rules.
> Oh suuuuuure. "We are all about freedom, but please no religional > stuff. Oh, and while we are at, get away with porn. And alcohol is bad > too, anything that can help people there, get away....." > Thats not how it works, we cant ask anyone putting things in main to not > discriminate against persons/groups/fields and then discriminate on our > own. I guess it's quite easy for to judge things like this using common sense... > > 4) The license is extremely anti-American, and I guess also > > anti-European/anti-Western. > Doesnt matter. Although you may be right from the what allows non-free point of view,.. but in all doing respect,.. this is rather stupid I guess. Next thing is that people "invent" licenses which force people to hate Jews, or elect only Democrats, or do not use KDE... Even if that fulfils non-free criteria... it should not go into Debian. Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1278069908.5300.13.ca...@fermat.scientia.net
