Daniel Pittman writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes:
>> Daniel Pittman writes:
>>> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
>
> [... waiting for enough devices to show up ...]
>
The only known solution today is to add a long delay during boot to try to
increase the ch
Hello everyone,
Goswin von Brederlow (I think he is an apt maintainer)
suggested to forward this wishlist bug report to debian-devel.
Best regards,
Alexandre Fournier
- Message Transféré -
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:44:23 +0200
De: Goswin von Brederlow
À: Alexandre Fournier
Cc: 58
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:45:20 +0200
Alexandre Fournier wrote:
> > Sometimes, from a user point of view, understanding why a package A
> > recommends or suggests package B1 or B2 is not straightforward.
> >
> > It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to explain what
> > features are enab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra
* Package name: qmf
Version : 1.0~2010w23
Upstream Author : Nokia Corporation
* URL : http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/messagingframework
* License : LGPL with exception or GPL3
Programming Lang: C++
Descr
It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to explain what
features are enabled in package A when installing package B1.
IMHO if the suggests isn't obvious, this should be part of the package
description. Something like "this package can also handle postscript
files if ghostscript is i
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:08:02 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Okay, I propose once python-twitter package should be removed from testing.
> > If we're lucky :), it'll be in squeeze, again.
>
> You should probably file a RC bug so that it doesn’t migrate again
> without being fixed first.
Tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra
* Package name: qt-simulator
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Nokia
* URL : http://labs.trolltech.com/page/Projects/Tools/QtSimulator
* License : LGPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : simulator f
Neil Williams writes:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:45:20 +0200
> Alexandre Fournier wrote:
>
>> > Sometimes, from a user point of view, understanding why a package A
>> > recommends or suggests package B1 or B2 is not straightforward.
>> >
>> > It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: José Manuel Santamaría Lema
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: screenie-qt
Version: 0
Upstream Author: Ariya Hidayat
URL: http://code.google.com/p/screenie/
License: GPLv2 or later
Description: fancy screenshot composer
Screenie a s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: sugar-terminal-activity
Version : 28
Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva
* URL : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Terminal_Activity
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Sug
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: jist
Version : 1.10~beta
Upstream Author : Bennett Landman
* URL : http://www.nitrc.org/projects/jist/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Descriptio
On 12163 March 1977, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> As announced that the end of April[0] we have dropped support for v3
> keys from the Debian keyring. At present this means debian-keyring.pgp
> still exists, but is an empty file. Once we have confirmation from DSA +
> FTP master that they have update
Hi.
WTF?!
I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
acceptet).
1) I'm generally quite sceptical about putting religious stuff into
Am 02.07.2010 00:21, schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
>
> 4) The license is extremely anti-American, and I guess also
> anti-European/anti-Western.
IMHO I think it does not comply with the DFSG, but it is still in NEW
and I trust the ftp-masters, that it will be rejected.
I don't see a reason t
Hi.
I do not see how a event based initsystem would us actually help (but
perhaps I just don't understand it well enough).
I mean an event would be something like "mount root-fs" but then it
would be still completely open, on what to actually do for that.
I'm also do some thinking/planning on
On 07/02/2010 12:34 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 02.07.2010 00:21, schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
>>
>> 4) The license is extremely anti-American, and I guess also
>> anti-European/anti-Western.
>
> IMHO I think it does not comply with the DFSG, but it is still in
> NEW and I trust the ftp
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:21:51AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 1) I'm generally quite sceptical about putting religious stuff into
> Debian (regardless of which religion we're talking about). This simply
> opens the gates for so many problems, politically, morally, etc.
> Perhaps a sep
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 00:34 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> There are also groups of people, which see porn as quite problematic at
> all, but we have got pornviewer e.g.. The software does not discrimate
> anyone, so why should we care about it?
Good argument...
The question however is,... who dec
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 3) The license contains many places which can be considered
> discriminatory, racist or fundamentalist.
> Apart from that... religious stuff shouldn't go into a license.
http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/waqf/license
The above URL has the license. I
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:21:51AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 2) How can the ftp-masters actually check whether this complies with the
> DFSG. As far as I can see from the English translation, it is not
> legally binding, and only the Arabic version is.
> I guess none of our ftp-maste
Am 02.07.2010 00:45, schrieb Russell Coker:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> 3) The license contains many places which can be considered
>> discriminatory, racist or fundamentalist.
>> Apart from that... religious stuff shouldn't go into a license.
>
> http://www.ojuba.org
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 00:39 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> The software is meant for non-free. Why it should be rejected? Even
> non-free stuff has to pass NEW for the first upload…
See points (1-4) from my original post, which are not change at all by
using non-free.
I mean even something like:
"Th
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 22:45 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I believe there is precedent for this. I remember seeing a program
> under a license written entirely in Japanese. When translated by a DD
> fluent in Japanese, it was found to be a simple 3-clause BSD-style
> license which is entirely
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:56:50AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > Furthermore,
> > such restrictions are unenforcable under US copyright law
> But Debian is not (only) under US law.
This is true. That's why I said: "Copyright law may differ in other
countries." I'm just pointing out
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Regarding the shutdown thingy... is there any chance that Debian would
> introduce kind of un-initramfs-images, in order to really unmount (not
> remount,ro) and then cleanly "close" all open block devices?
> Or do we have
On Fr, 02 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
> even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
> NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
> acceptet).
One more data point (
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 621 (new: 5)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 143 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
"Christoph Anton Mitterer" wrote:
>Hi.
>
>
>WTF?!
>
>I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
>even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
>NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
>acceptet).
I trust ftp-masters w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jason Morawski
* Package name: shrinksafe
Version : 1.4.3
Upstream Author : Alex Russell
* URL : http://shrinksafe.dojotoolkit.org/
* License : MPL-1.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description : JavaScript "compressio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ibus-sunpinyin
Version: 2.0.1
Upstream Autho : Lei Zhang
Ervin Yan
Yong Sun
Kefu Chai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: xsunpinyin
Version: 2.0.1
Upstream Autho : Lei Zhang
Ervin Yan
Yong Sun
Kefu Chai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: open-gram-data
Version: 20100702-1
Upstream Author: Kefu Chai
Yong Sun
Wei Xue
Mike Qin
URL: http:/
After digging for support for Razer Gaming Mice for the past year, I came
across a project that supports a number of Razer mice and and uses pyqt4 for
the interface. This is a great tool and as I have noticed not just the number
of Linux users growing but gamers whom use such mice, such as mysel
>> The above URL has the license. I think that the concepts in the preamble
>> are
>> interesting, offering software to please Allah and denying the concept of
>> "ownership" of Intellectual Property.
> Which is not only non-free in Debian, we can not distribute it.
> A software license is not
34 matches
Mail list logo
