Am 02.07.2010 00:45, schrieb Russell Coker: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer <cales...@scientia.net> wrote: >> 3) The license contains many places which can be considered >> discriminatory, racist or fundamentalist. >> Apart from that... religious stuff shouldn't go into a license. > > http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/waqf/license > > The above URL has the license. I think that the concepts in the preamble are > interesting, offering software to please Allah and denying the concept of > "ownership" of Intellectual Property.
Which is not only non-free in Debian, we can not distribute it.
A software license is not allowed to force other users to please any "god".
I think we all agree with this point, so please don't start a religious
discussion now on this list..
> Also as we don't discriminate against fields of endeavor the "good purpose"
> part wouldn't be acceptable even if it could be clearly defined and agreed.
> If Stormfront, Al Quaeda, or Right to Life want to use Debian then as a
> matter
> of principle we should let them do so - but of course the members of such
> organisations think that they have a "good purpose" so it probably doesn't
> matter much.
>
ACK.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
