Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 575209
Bug #575209 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general:
Error resolving hostname
> reassign 575209 eglibc
Bug #575209 [general] general: Error resolving hostname
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'eglibc'.
> found 575209 2.10.2
On 2010-03-24, Marc Haber wrote:
> Marc, who has preferred language DE as well and cringes whenever a
> Debian page comes up and would really love to see those in English
I would like to tell content negotiation that I prefer German if the
page is natively German, English if the page is natively
reopen 575209
reassign 575209 eglibc
found 575209 2.10.2-6
found 575209 2.11-0exp6
severity 575209 important
retitle 575209 Please resolv domain names with hyphens as border chars
tags 575209 + patch
thanks
Hi Holger et al (please drop -devel out of the list of CCs if you feel
this is getting of
On 24/03/2010 21:43, Simon Paillard wrote:
> I guess you know the existence of debian-l10n-french, whose address is
> displayed at the bottom of each translated page, so that you can report
> any issue like mistranslation, lack of clarity, or anything you think is
> wrong ?
>
> Same as software, t
Hi,
Responding to
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/archives/201-lintian,-source-format-3.0-and-blog-comments.html:
1/ Instead of taking 30 minutes to explain why you don't care of the new
formats, it would have been way more useful to apply the patch
sitting in http:/
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 2/ You explain that you have no reason to switch to the new formats. Fine.
>I have explained you that I believe there are good reasons for
>switching (I won't repeat the wiki page). Why are you insisting to not
>switch w
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Responding to
> http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/archives/201-lintian,-source-format-3.0-and-blog-comments.html:
Thanks, Raphael, for bringing this to a proper place!
> 1/ Instead of taking 30 minut
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> 2/ You explain that you have no reason to switch to the new formats. Fine.
>>I have explained you that I believe there are good reasons for
>>switching (I won't repeat the wiki page). Why are you insist
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:24:17PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> 2/ You explain that you have no reason to switch to the new formats. Fine.
> >>I have explained you that I believe there are good reasons
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:24:17PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
[…]
>> Besides, may I remind you the existence of this page
>> http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/NewDebFormats ?
>
> May I remind that several persons pointed out this was not a good goal ?
>
This is not a reaso
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:58:39PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Why are you insisting that all DDs should switch when switching is an
> effort for no benefit[1] and not switching is no effort at all ?
In fact, I don't feel this is the point [1]. The new lintian warning,
which triggered the various
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > 2/ You explain that you have no reason to switch to the new formats. Fine.
> >I have explained you that I believe there are good reasons for
> >switching (I won't repeat the wiki p
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:21 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> reopen 575209
> reassign 575209 eglibc
> found 575209 2.10.2-6
> found 575209 2.11-0exp6
> severity 575209 important
> retitle 575209 Please resolv domain names with hyphens as border chars
> tags 575209 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi Holger et
Fabian Greffrath writes:
> - Sites with domain names like do already exist!
> Do you think they should be accessible by any other proprietary
> operating system, but not Debian? Not really!
Anyone can enter bogus data in the DNS. Neither the existence of such
data nor the failure to detect it
Nicolas François, le Tue 23 Mar 2010 23:59:29 +0100, a écrit :
> Is it an issue to set the utf8 flag too often?
> (does it break something?,
It has the converse effect as forgetting it, cf the original bug report:
“ATM, if one runs cat from a VT with a UTF-8 locale, type a non-ascii
character, ba
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 13:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:21 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > - The advice in the cited RFC is already ignored. Domain names that
> > start with a digit, e.g. 12345.foo.bar, can be resolved, whereas the
> > RFC tells us "They [labels] must star
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > 2/ You explain that you have no reason to switch to the new formats. Fine.
> > >I have explained you that I belie
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:15:06PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > - Sites with domain names like do already exist!
> > Do you think they should be accessible by any other proprietary
> > operating system, but not Debian? Not really!
> So if Windows accepts it then it must be OK? I don't think
Am 25.03.2010 14:15, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
So if Windows accepts it then it must be OK? I don't think we have to
follow that rule. Otherwise you should be demanding support for NMB and
WINS in glibc.
Mac OS X, too, BTW. But that's not what I wanted to say.
I wanted to say that I consider it
Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 06:36 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Which derivative distribution has asked for this? Speaking with my Ubuntu
> hat on, the sudden arrival of 3.0 in sid (yes, we knew it was coming
> eventually, but had no inkling of a probable timeline until it was already
> done) has
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> And the lintian warning goes away by explicitly setting source format to 1,
> so that's not standardizing on the "set of improved source formats"
> /anyway/, that's just nagging maintainers to make a change to their packages
> that AFAICS only helps your
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:39:11PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 06:36 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > Which derivative distribution has asked for this? Speaking with my Ubuntu
> > hat on, the sudden arrival of 3.0 in sid (yes, we knew it was coming
> > eventually, b
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 04:07:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For zless, people seem to open the debian.tar with vim or similar but I
> can understand that it's less usable than a simple pager view of the
> relevant files. Maybe it's a good idea to provide a debreview/debinspect
> command in
3/25/2010 9:25:17
Hola,
Busque en Google y Yahoo por Sus servicios y no los he podido encontrar.
Notaran cuan importante es figurar en los primeros 10 posiciones de los
buscadores, pues estarán
recibiendo visitas diarias y asi tener la oportunidad de obtener mas
clientes.
Los invito a que in
Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 08:40 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > While it is interesting to know that the lack of Ubuntu involvement into
> > Debian can also lead to major breakage on your side,
> But even if the fault lies entirely with Ubuntu and you think Ubuntu is evil
> and should be disrega
On 2010-03-25, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I’d expect it to be much smoother for an organization that uses Debian
> tools and works with us to add missing functionality in them if needed,
> than for an organization that uses its own tools.
You seriously don't want to force dak upon everyone. And t
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 16:16 + schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 2010-03-25, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I’d expect it to be much smoother for an organization that uses Debian
> > tools and works with us to add missing functionality in them if needed,
> > than for an organization that uses it
On Wed,24.Mar.10, 21:29:47, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I don't know the english translation for "klingt irgendwie steif".
"Sounds too formal?". I think you are assuming "you" to be less formal
than it actually is[1].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussion
Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
> Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
> such packages?
Have you ever tried to install dak?
If you have, then the answer should be obvious to you. If you haven't,
try it someday, and you'll understand.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debia
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 17:57 +0100 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
> Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
> > such packages?
>
> Have you ever tried to install dak?
No.
> If you have, then the answer should be obvious to you
Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
> Is there a plan for making the installation of dak easier?
The issue (if there actually is an issue there, which is debatable) is
not so much that dak is hard to install (because it's such a beast and
the documentation isn't exactly stellar) but rather that dak is ve
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:19:41PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
> such packages?
This does not truly answer your question, but since my theory would
be unpleasant to the members of core teams, I offer you this instead:
http:
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:58:39PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Why are you insisting that all DDs should switch when switching is an
>> effort for no benefit[1] and not switching is no effort at all ?
> In fact, I don't feel this is the point [1]. The new lintian wa
Steve Langasek writes:
> And the lintian warning goes away by explicitly setting source format to
> 1, so that's not standardizing on the "set of improved source formats"
> /anyway/, that's just nagging maintainers to make a change to their
> packages that AFAICS only helps your real goal if they
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
> > And the lintian warning goes away by explicitly setting source format to
> > 1, so that's not standardizing on the "set of improved source formats"
> > /anyway/, that's just nagging maintainers to make a change to their
> > p
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yes. I explicitly declined to add a Lintian tag warning about all use of
> format 1.0 because I don't believe there's consensus to deprecate it. But
> the request to note the format explicitly seemed reasonable to me.
I disagree - my packages are in source format 1, I shou
Colin Tuckley writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yes. I explicitly declined to add a Lintian tag warning about all use
>> of format 1.0 because I don't believe there's consensus to deprecate
>> it. But the request to note the format explicitly seemed reasonable to
>> me.
> I disagree - my packag
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:10:39AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yes. I explicitly declined to add a Lintian tag warning about all use of
> format 1.0 because I don't believe there's consensus to deprecate it. But
> the request to note the format explicitly seemed reasonable to me.
I think
Hi,
Russ Allbery (25/03/2010):
> Well, certainly the goal of Lintian is not to produce tags for which
> the project consensus is that nothing should be done about. If
> people don't feel like this is a good idea, we can remove it. It
> made sense to me personally, but that isn't a deciding crit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Timo Jyrinki
Owner: Timo Jyrinki
* Package name: literki
Version : 0.0.0+20100113.git1da40724
Upstream Author : Michal Brzozowski
* URL : http://git.senfdax.de/?p=literki
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Descr
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:42:20 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Colin Tuckley writes:
I wasn't going to contribute to this thread but the initial bun fight
seems to have calmed down and people are starting to talk sense. I'll
do everything I can to keep it that way by ignoring unhelpful comments.
> >
On Wed,24.Mar.10, 21:29:47, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I don't know the english translation for "klingt irgendwie steif".
Obviously, the literal translation is "sounds somehow stiff", which
isn't too far away - maybe "sounds somewhat stiff".
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:10:39AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Yes. I explicitly declined to add a Lintian tag warning about all use of
> > format 1.0 because I don't believe there's consensus to deprecate it. But
> > the request to note the format e
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> Agreed, although I think the real bug is in dpkg not being able to
> cope without a new file.
In what way dpkg doesn't cope?
The change requested by the lintian tag is preventive, not corrective.
> The idea that all source packages are going to have t
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:42:59 +0100
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Agreed, although I think the real bug is in dpkg not being able to
> > cope without a new file.
>
> In what way dpkg doesn't cope?
I'm not sure, I got that impression - otherwise why do ex
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> > debian/source/format, I'll override the lintian warning until dpkg
> > is fixed. (Already done that for a few packages.)
>
> Doing that means “I don't want to hardcode the format to use, I want
> to use whatever the dpkg main
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> There might be not short term benefit for the current maintainer, but
> it's a benefit for our derivatives distributions to be able to simply add
> patches in a consistent manner. It will also be a benefit for Debian if in
> 2 years some newbie packager doesn't have to lea
On 12065 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> ries.debian.org, the host behind ftp-master.debian.org, has hardware
> trouble, a failed memory module keeps resetting the machine at random
> intervals.
No, its not fixed, just thought of giving a little update:
I did an initial check of stuff that re
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 23:30 +0100 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
> Additionally we have one package in the archive that we can not help
> with a binnmu, a full source upload is required. The maintainer got a
> seperate mail asking for the upload, but for reference, its fatsort, the
> latest versio
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 591 (new: 16)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 129 (new: 2)
Total number of packages reques
I revisited both the Lintian tag and the long description in light of this
discussion and some private feedback, and for the next release of Lintian
have tentatively made the following changes:
* The tag was previously severity: normal. Lintian tag severities should
match bug severities were on
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:47:22AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > debian/source/format, I'll override the lintian warning until dpkg
> > > is fixed. (Already done that for a few packages.)
> > Doing that means “I don't want
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 00:39 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:35:33PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
[...]
> > But I'm not aware of a git tree holding the debian kernels - SVN is
> > still listed as the VCS for the linux-2.6 package (which, BTW,
> > continues to surprise me).
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Francesco Ferlito
Package name: libskeleton
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Viktor Gal (wiking)
URL : http://wiki.xiph.org/Ogg_Skeleton
License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : A library for re
54 matches
Mail list logo
