On 11631 March 1977, Anthony Towns wrote:
> There seem to be some issues with the ftp mirror on merkel:
> $ pwd
> /srv/ftp.debian.org/ftp
> $ ls -l dists/sid/Contents-powerpc.diff/ | tail -n2
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 archvsync archvsync 2053 Jan 14 13:40 Index
> ?- ? ? ? ?
> Umh... This might be the cause, then. Our mirror sync has died three
> days in a row - At 16:37, 15:49 and 17:36 (GMT-6):
>From where are you pulling?
--
bye, Joerg
Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind.
-- Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man
--
To UNSUBSC
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Anthony Towns wrote:
> There seem to be some issues with the ftp mirror on merkel:
>
> $ pwd
> /srv/ftp.debian.org/ftp
> $ ls -l dists/sid/Contents-powerpc.diff/ | tail -n2
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 archvsync archvsync 2053 Jan 14 13:40 Index
> ?- ? ? ? ?
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:22 -0500
"Jamin W. Collins" wrote:
> Marvin Renich wrote:
> > * Harald Braumann [090113 05:47]:
> >>
> >> AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using
> >> the same user. So jabber-muc needs to create its own user. On
> >> update, that's no problem.
As several people have pointed out, there is already a good way (that I was not
aware of) to find out this information, therefore I agree that this bug should
be closed.
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:22 -0500
> "Jamin W. Collins" wrote:
>
> > Marvin Renich wrote:
> > > * Harald Braumann [090113 05:47]:
> > >>
> > >> AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using
> > >> the same user. So j
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, revuedelibre . wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Harald Braumann wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:22 -0500
>> "Jamin W. Collins" wrote:
>>
>> > Marvin Renich wrote:
>> > > * Harald Braumann [090113 05:47]:
>> > >>
>> > >> AFAIK, there's no way for
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:05:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > Umh... This might be the cause, then. Our mirror sync has died three
> > days in a row - At 16:37, 15:49 and 17:36 (GMT-6):
>
> From where are you pulling?
syncproxy.wna.debian.org
Sergio.
--
Dr Sergio Mendoza
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:32:18PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Package: acpi-support-base
> Architecture: any
> Depends: acpid [i386|amd64]
>
I do not understand what you are proposing. The package would not be
binary-indep
in your proposal (and the current syntax for depends is "acpid [i386
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soeren Sonnenburg
* Package name: coinor-csdp
Version : 6.0.1
Upstream Author : Brian Borchers
* URL : https://projects.coin-or.org/Csdp
* License : CPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A software package for se
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, John Goerzen wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Hardlink is a tool which detects multiple copies of the same file and
> > replaces them with hardlinks.
> > .
> > The idea has been taken from http://code.google.com/p/hardlinkpy/, but
> > the code has been written from sc
Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, John Goerzen wrote:
>> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> > Hardlink is a tool which detects multiple copies of the same file and
>> > replaces them with hardlinks.
>> > .
>> > The idea has been taken from http://code.google.com/p/hardlinkpy/, but
>> > th
* Julian Andres Klode [Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:07:55 +0100]:
Hello, Julian.
> This would be my other proposal, also known as Bug#436733:
> Package: acpi-support-base
> Architecture: all
> Depends: acpid [i386 amd64]
> But in order to be correct, currently apt and co. do not support this.
> The
On Thu Jan 15 17:49, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> An arch:all package should be installable anywhere where its
> dependencies can be satisfied. And if they can't be satisfied, dpkg/apt
> will refuse to install it already.
>
> No, the only use for "Architecture: all [i386 amd64]" or
> "Install-Architect
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 15:10, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, John Goerzen wrote:
>> Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> > Hardlink is a tool which detects multiple copies of the same file and
>> > replaces them with hardlinks.
>> > .
>> > The idea has been taken from http://code.google
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Atir Javid
Package name: php-gtk
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : php-gtk
URL : http://gtk.php.net/
License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (PHP, GTK+)
Description : PHP-GTK is an extension for the PHP programmi
* Matthew Johnson [Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:21:03 +]:
> > No, the only use for "Architecture: all [i386 amd64]" or
> > "Install-Architecture: i368 amd64" would be as a hint to dak (and other
> > tools) that the package is known not to be installable anywhere else,
> > and hence should not be put in
>> > Umh... This might be the cause, then. Our mirror sync has died three
>> > days in a row - At 16:37, 15:49 and 17:36 (GMT-6):
>> From where are you pulling?
> syncproxy.wna.debian.org
Completly different machine, so not the cause for your trouble.
--
bye, Joerg
Linus: "Wenn Darl McBride die
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Max Vozeler
* Package name: usbip
Version : 0.1.7
Upstream Author : Takahiro Hirofuchi
* URL : http://usbip.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : USB device sharing system over IP ne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
please package it, if the license is ok for you.
Package name: netlogo
Version:
Upstream Author: [NAME ]
URL: [http://ccl.northwestern.edu/]
Licen
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:49:33 +0100
Adeodato Simó wrote:
(Please drop me from CC: where possible, -devel is fine for me.
Keeping Julian in CC - not sure if he's subscribed to -devel but I'm
confident you are, Adeodato.)
> * Julian Andres Klode [Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:07:55 +0100]:
>
> > 4. An exter
Hoi,
I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
because more oppinions do likely improve the result.
My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
What do you think?
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Hi,
I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
because more oppinions do likely improve the result.
My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
What do you think?
before wild speculations ensues, you mig
[2009-01-15 22:37] Michael Goetze
>
> before wild speculations ensues, you might want to specify what you
> really want to know: the percentage of people installing debian systems
> who use popcon (always/sometimes), or the percentage of installed
> machines that submit popcon data?
Seems my
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:55 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-01-15 22:37] Michael Goetze
>>
>> before wild speculations ensues, you might want to specify what you
>> really want to know: the percentage of people installing debian systems
>> who use popcon (always/sometimes), or the percentage
James Vega wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:55 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
I want to know the percentage of installed machines that submit popcon
data.
That requires knowing the number of computers that have Debian installed
which, as has been discussed various times in the past on this list,
Michael Goetze schrieb:
> Hi,
>
>> I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
>> submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
>> because more oppinions do likely improve the result.
>>
>> My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
>>
>> What do you thin
El Jue 15 Ene 2009, markus schnalke escribió:
> My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
that means that there is between 78055/(1/3)=234165 and 78055/(2/3)=117,082 of
Debian installations. It doesn't look like a big number... I think that we are
more.
Maybe your estimation is too high.
lucian
In article <20090115210004.gv21...@serveme.schnalke.local> you wrote:
> My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
Machines or Users?
According to Linuxcounter there are estimated 29,000,000 users and debian has
18.36% which equals in 5m debian users. Popcon lists 78k submissions,
which is less th
markus schnalke writes:
> I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
> submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses, because
> more oppinions do likely improve the result.
>
> My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
>
> What do you think?
We run Deb
Hello,
Here is a list of ITPs for various mbrola voices.
Samuel
Bug#511973 ITP: mbrola-de6 -- German male voice for Mbrola
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2008-01-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mbrola-de6
Version : 0.0.20021125-1
Upstream Author : Faculte Polytechni
Le Thursday 15 January 2009 23:25:02 Bernd Eckenfels, vous avez écrit :
> In article <20090115210004.gv21...@serveme.schnalke.local> you wrote:
> > My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
>
> Machines or Users?
>
> According to Linuxcounter there are estimated 29,000,000 users and debian
> has 18.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Nicholson
* Package name: Plumi
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Andy Nicholson
* URL : http://plumi.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Plumi is a Free Software video sharing Conten
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Ferlito
* Package name: liboggplay
Version : 0.0.2~svn3836
Upstream Author : Shane Stephens (shans)
Upstream Author : Conrad Parker (kfish)
* URL : http://annodex.net/software/liboggplay/index.html
* License : (s
Hi,
I would like to update and maintain the libotf[1] Debian packages. I am
already maintaining the related m17n Debian packages[2].
The libotf (0.9.4) packages have been neglected by the current
maintainer for nearly 3 years. Upstream[3] have regularly released
updates. I'm also in regular conta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Ferlito
* Package name: libkate
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Vincent Penquerc'h
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/libkate/
* License : New BSD License
Programming Lang: C
Description : Kate is a codec fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: pacman-package-manager
Version : 3.2.2
Upstream Author : Judd Vinet
* URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : minimalist package man
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock
* Package name: libdownload
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Aaron Griffin
* URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : library for downloading files fr
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:22 +1100, Andy Nicholson wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andy Nicholson
>
> * Package name: Plumi
Package names need to be lowercase.
> Version : 0.2.3
> Upstream Author : Andy Nicholson
> * URL : http://plumi.org/
> * L
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:00:04PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
> submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
> because more oppinions do likely improve the result.
This question of trying to figur
On Friday 16 January 2009 03:00:38 John Ferlito wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: John Ferlito
>
> * Package name: libkate
> Version : 0.3.0
> Upstream Author : Vincent Penquerc'h
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/libkate/
> * License : New
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 460 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 109 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
[2009-01-16 05:59] Noah Slater
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:00:04PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
> > submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
> > because more oppinions do likely improve the result.
[2009-01-15 23:25] Bernd Eckenfels
> In article <20090115210004.gv21...@serveme.schnalke.local> you wrote:
> > My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
>
> Machines or Users?
Popcon focuses on machines. In the end I want users. But any number
would be good.
> According to Linuxcounter there ar
Thanks. Unless you setup some experimental method, any argument
should reduce
to handwaving or extension of various particular examples..
Surely, it must be possible to get an estimate of the number of
downloads of important packages and security updates? I know these
downloads also are
45 matches
Mail list logo
