On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
"Someday someone should do this..."
---
Sometimes I stumble on interesting or useful ideas on mailingslists,
which should be done, but the person having that in mind, doesn't have
time to do those. So I came up with ide
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvestre Ledru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmatio
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Christopher Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mati
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:24:09 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The way I understand it, they HAVE been pushing... and pushing... for
>> a long time... against a nonresponsive binutils maintainer. This
>> thread is just their latest, la
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Hendrik Sattler
>
> | Am Samstag 05 April 2008 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> | > Whoever develops software based on libbar will have to have a call to
> | > pkg-config somewhere in their build process so they should depend on
> | > pkg-config.
> |
> |
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The way I understand it, they HAVE been pushing... and pushing... for
>>> a long time... against a nonresponsive binutils maintainer. This
>>> thread is just their latest, last-ditch e
Hi,
> I wrote a small program for Fritz!Box owners and I was wondering if
> anyone would like to maintain it. It is a small tray program that shows
> a notificatin on outgoing or incoming phonecalls. It has been written
> for GNOME, but also works with KDE. The tool currently runs in English
> or
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 09:33 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > That depends on the library you are linking against. I, as an library
> > author is free to say «the only supported way to use my gargleblaster
> > library is through the I_CAN_HAS
* Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080415 21:57]:
> Now I suppose sparc and others might still like it if they have
> performance advantages of 32bit code over 64bit code, in which case
> keeping 64bit for only those programs where the extra address space is
> worth it would be great.
I guess
Hi,
> Since dpkg 1.14.17, dpkg-buildpackage will define the environment
> variables CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS and FFLAGS. The goal is to
> be able to easily recompile packages with supplementary compilation flags
> and to simplify the debian/rules files since CFLAGS has the right def
On 2008-04-16, Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't helpful for several reasons:
> a) Burying this information in a wiki where people may or may not read
> it in time (I just reverted a change already done in SVN).
I got the idea of pushing it out when Hertzog was talking about sen
Am Dienstag, den 15.04.2008, 22:58 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> FTFBS on packages build-depending on libqt4-dev
> ---
>
> If your package is build-depending on libqt4-dev and is currently failing
> to build from sources, please wait for the next qt
Hi,
if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed
library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package
and thus goes to NEW.
Last time I asked it wasn't possible for me, as a DM, to upload it and
I had to search for a sponsor.
Is there some policital reason for
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed
> library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package
> and thus goes to NEW.
>
> Last time I asked it wasn't possible for me, as a DM, to upload i
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed
> > library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package
> > and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
How do you think a maintainer should manage security issues when he is
not the package developer? Should he/she either work alone to make
patches or wait for the upstream patches/relases that solve the bug?
Andrea De Iacovo
-BEGIN PGP SIG
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Andrea De Iacovo wrote:
> How do you think a maintainer should manage security issues when he is
> not the package developer? Should he/she either work alone to make
> patches or wait for the upstream patches/relases that solve the bug?
As ever, the best
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:55 +0200, Andrea De Iacovo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> How do you think a maintainer should manage security issues when he is
> not the package developer? Should he/she either work alone to make
> patches or wait for the upstream patches/relases that solve the bug?
Notify upstre
---
Bright Paul wants to stay in better touch using some of Google's coolest new
products.
If you already have Gmail or Google Talk, visit:
http://mail.google.com/mail/b-adfe2d3c11-5bc346a7b5-261400fbee2be624
You'll need to click
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:50:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: datapacker
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://software.complete.org/data
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:34 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed
> > library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package
> > and thus goes to NEW.
> >
> > Last
On ke, 2008-04-16 at 13:55 +0200, Andrea De Iacovo wrote:
> How do you think a maintainer should manage security issues when he is
> not the package developer? Should he/she either work alone to make
> patches or wait for the upstream patches/relases that solve the bug?
If the package maintainer i
Hello,
on the 1st of April I wrote an e-mail to James Troup offering my help in hunting
down open bugs which are no longer present an thus enabling him to concentrate
on packaging GnuPG 1.4.9. But his last action regarding this package is well
over an year old and the only updates I can see in the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:38:16AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> >"Someday someone should do this..."
> >---
> >
> >Sometimes I stumble on interesting or useful ideas on mailingslists,
> >which should be done, but the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:19:12PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> on the 1st of April I wrote an e-mail to James Troup offering my help in
> hunting
> down open bugs which are no longer present an thus enabling him to concentrate
> on packaging GnuPG 1.4.9. But his last action regarding this packa
Hi Roberto,
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:24, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> This is something that I propsed on January 3, 2007, on debian-devel.
> There was a fairly lengthy thread that resulted and Thomas Viehmann even
> offered to help. Of course, he and I both became very busy and so it
> sort
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:34 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > > if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed
> > > library (for example [1]
Twas brillig at 10:01:53 16.04.2008 UTC+02 when Goswin von Brederlow did gyre
and gimble:
GvB> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GvB> - 13 month from initial report to raising a minor issue that has no
GvB> negative effects on the functionality
GvB> - 4 days to fix the issue
GvB> - 9
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Darren Salt wrote:
> I'd rather that this just got left in debian/rules, where it belongs:
> xine-lib, for example, needs more than just -O0 for disabling optimisations.
You can keep it there for special cases like this one.
But I disagree that debian/rules is necessarily the
Hello again,
Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> [...] Is there anything I can help (I'm certainly not suitable as a maintainer
> for that package myself, because it's too essential to be entrusted to someone
> who is unknown to (nearly) all people on this list) with, e.g. by triaging
> bugs?
I've just seen
I demand that Raphael Hertzog may or may not have written...
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Le Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:58:29PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>>> Since dpkg 1.14.17, dpkg-buildpackage will define the environment
>>> variables CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS a
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
>
> 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIBS and / or
> FOO_CFLAGS by the use of pkg-config*, pkg-config becomes part of the API
> of that library and the -dev package
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:59 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. As I said, I am not questioning new SONAME bumps
> going into NEW.
>
> The question is, whether the DMs should be allowed to upload SONAME
> bumps to NEW by themselves or not.
Umm, I would have to say no. Sorry.
SONA
Quoting Kai Wasserbäch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
> on the 1st of April I wrote an e-mail to James Troup offering my help in
> hunting
You shouldn't have done this on 1st of April as you could then have
received an answer.
> So my question is: Is James known to be inactive? Are there others c
Le Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:44:56 Neil Williams, vous avez écrit :
> An upload of a new application is nowhere near as complex as the upload
> to start a library SONAME transition. Even uploading a new library never
> seen in Debian before is easier than starting a SONAME transition for a
> libra
* Goswin von Brederlow
| I would go one step further. Imho libraries with *.pc files should say
| "the only supported way to use this lib is by using pkg-config".
I would not recommend that, as pkg-config upstream.
| > | Putting pkg-config on Recommends of Suggests of every -dev packages
| > |
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:12 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> >
> > 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIBS and / or
> > FOO_CFLAGS by the use of pkg-config*, pkg-con
First of all, I skipped a large part of this thread, so I'm sorry if
this has come up before.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > And by this definition, it is the package _invoking_ pkg-config that
> > should Build-Depend on it, not the package that happens to ship
Hi,
it is the third time that I've got this type of rejection. I faced
it two times with package gnumed-client and now with a different package.
Is anybody able to explain this and how can I avoid the problem. I
just builded the package with an up to date pbuilder.
Puzzled
Andreas.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:24, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
This is something that I propsed on January 3, 2007, on debian-devel.
Great!! I did not noticed. :-(
There was a fairly lengthy thread that resulted and Thomas Viehmann even
offered to help
On Wed Apr 16 17:19, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is the third time that I've got this type of rejection. I faced
> it two times with package gnumed-client and now with a different package.
>
> Is anybody able to explain this and how can I avoid the problem. I
> just builded the package with
* Romain Beauxis [Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:53:21 +0100]:
> In the mean time, it's still possible for a DM to upload a different soname
> in
> the same binary package, which would result in an even worse mess, right ?
Well, DDs have done this in the past already, so...
--
Adeodato Simó
* Raphael Hertzog [Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:20:36 +0200]:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I'd rather that this just got left in debian/rules, where it belongs:
> > xine-lib, for example, needs more than just -O0 for disabling optimisations.
> You can keep it there for special cases like
Hi,
Andreas Tille wrote:
it is the third time that I've got this type of rejection. I faced
it two times with package gnumed-client and now with a different
package.
[...]
Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed.
Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: actual file size (1289) does not match
size (1
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
do you have updated devscripts?
Will this be updated by
sudo pbuilder update
?
debsign signs the dsc then updates the
md5 hash in the changes before signing that. It needs to update the sha
checks as well. The latest devscripts does.
I fail
On Wed Apr 16 17:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Do I have to start pdebuild out of an "unstable" system? This
> would be a nuisance because I do not want to run unstable on this
> machine and regarded pbuilder as a very nice way to maintain a
> proper unstable chroot.
It depends where you run debsign
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
fwiw, this was mentioned in the recent Misc Development News post to d-d-a.
Yes, but I expect an up to date pbuilder to contain everything I
need. Thinking about it chances are good that the GPG key is not
copied to the building chroot and my assump
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:49:50PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> There are rumours about that, yes. Maybe a package hijack could be
> attempted by someone who's lucky enough to have his|her key in the
> keyring.
>
... and still have it after that upload :-P
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Salvatore Ansani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: plasma-netgraph
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : John Varouhakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/plasma-netgraph?content=74071
* License
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> But I disagree that debian/rules is necessarily the place where it belongs.
> It looks like cruft/bad design to have the same snippet of code in all
> packages.
Perhaps this should be fixed in another way then? For example a shared
Makefile includ
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ashwini Prajapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 16, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Please All Links Builder My Request Added
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You always be happy :)
You always be smile :)
You always be happy :)
You always be smile :)
You al
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 05:51:48PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> fwiw, this was mentioned in the recent Misc Development News post to d-d-a.
>
> Yes, but I expect an up to date pbuilder to contain everything I
> need. Thinking about it chances are g
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080415 21:57]:
>> Now I suppose sparc and others might still like it if they have
>> performance advantages of 32bit code over 64bit code, in which case
>> keeping 64bit for only those programs where the extra
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
>> What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
>>
>> 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIBS and / or
>> FOO_CFLAGS by the use of pkg-config*, pkg-config becomes part o
I demand that Loïc Minier may or may not have written...
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> But I disagree that debian/rules is necessarily the place where it
>> belongs. It looks like cruft/bad design to have the same snippet of code
>> in all packages.
> Perhaps this should be fi
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 19:15 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> >> What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> >>
> >> 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIB
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:15:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> You are missing the point.
>
> What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"?
But the library can't say "foo must come from a Debian package". What if
I have my local replacement? Why should I be forced
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 19:57 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:15:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > You are missing the point.
> >
> > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"?
>
> But the library can't say "foo must come from a Debian p
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:23 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> First of all, I skipped a large part of this thread, so I'm sorry if
> this has come up before.
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > And by this definition, it is the package _invoking_ pkg-config that
> > >
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The way I understand it, they HAVE been pushing... and pushing... for
a long time... against a nonresponsive binutils maintainer. This
thre
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:21:51PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:50:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * Package name: datapacker
>> Version : 1.0.0
>> Upstream Author :
Hi,
The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time
since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package:
http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/
In these package pairs, (at least) one of the two packages must declare
a conflict with the other pack
Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:19:12PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>> on the 1st of April I wrote an e-mail to James Troup offering my help in
>> hunting
>> down open bugs which are no longer present an thus enabling him to
>> concentrate
>> on packaging GnuPG 1.4.9. But his l
On 16/04/08 at 17:08 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:49:50PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > There are rumours about that, yes. Maybe a package hijack could be
> > attempted by someone who's lucky enough to have his|her key in the
> > keyring.
>
> ... and stil
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:58:52 pm Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time
> since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package:
>
> http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/
>
> In these package pairs, (at lea
Hi Simon,
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since dpkg 1.14.17, dpkg-buildpackage will define the environment
>> variables CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS and FFLAGS. The goal is to
>> be able to easily recompile packages with supplementary compilation flags
>> and to simplify th
Adeodato wrote:
> On the other hand, the bit about running `debian/rules build` by hand
> seems valid to me.
Indeed, that's what my fingers are used to typing if I just want a
patched package for local use. I wouldn't be surprised if there were
lots of other users who are the same.
The various wr
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 09:33:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/04/08 at 17:08 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:49:50PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > There are rumours about that, yes. Maybe a package hijack could be
> > > attempted by someone who'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dose2
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Berke Durak, Jaap Boender
* URL : http://gforge.inria.fr/projects/sodiac/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Descriptio
Am Mittwoch, den 16.04.2008, 14:19 +0200 schrieb Kai Wasserbäch:
> on the 1st of April I wrote an e-mail to James Troup offering my help in
> hunting
> down open bugs which are no longer present an thus enabling him to concentrate
> on packaging GnuPG 1.4.9. But his last action regarding this pac
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> >
> > 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIBS and / or
> > FOO_CFLAGS by the use of pkg-config*,
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:38:39 +0100, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I demand that Loïc Minier may or may not have written...
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> But I disagree that debian/rules is necessarily the place where it
>>> belongs. It looks like cruft/bad design t
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:15:53 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You are missing the point.
> What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"?
How does the library say that? Why can't I just have
gcc -o baz baz.c -lfoo
How can the librar
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:12 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > > What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> > >
> > > 1. If a library *only supports the retrieva
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:32:17AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>Dear Developers,
>
>Now that I have your attention, I would like to make the following
> delegations:
>
> 1. Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is appointed FTP-master.
>
> 2. Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is made
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared
> file
> names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that
> possible, I'd say that the package with files being replaced should usually
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:20:21PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>
> > I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared
> > file
> > names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephane Glondu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocamlpam
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Sharvil Nanavati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sharvil.nanavati.net/projects/ocamlpam/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:48:26 +0200: NMU attempt gets vetoed
>
> Nope, this is only a patch with a mail subject 'Patch for pending NMU of
> binutils'
The BTS doesn't show it but it was vetoed.
>> Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:01:53 +0200:
Le Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:39:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed.
> >Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: actual file size (1289) does not match
> >size (1052) in .changes sha1 Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha256 check
> >failed. Reje
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good idea. I just added screenshots.debian.org idea that came up on
> > some discussion at Chemnitzer LinuxTage in March. It would be nice if
> > somebody would grab this up - at least the idea will not just va
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Wed Apr 16 17:19, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it is the third time that I've got this type of rejection. I faced
> > it two times with package gnumed-client and now with a different package.
> >
> > Is anybody able to e
Hi !
Your friend shrishanidev from , just invited you to his/her online photo
albums and journals at Zorpia.com.
So what is Zorpia?
It is an online community that allows you to upload unlimited amount of photos,
write journals and make friends. We also have a variety of skins in store
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:32:17AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
Dear Developers,
Now that I have your attention, I would like to make the following
delegations:
1. Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is appointed FTP-master.
2. Joerg Jasp
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:39:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
>> Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed.
>>> Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: actual file size (1289) does not match
>>> size (1052) in .changes sha1 Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc:
* Manoj Srivastava
| On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:15:53 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
|
| > You are missing the point.
|
| > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during build"?
|
| How does the library say that? Why can't I just have
| gcc -o baz
* Neil Williams
| That is an example of a library including pkg-config into the library
| API. Changing that behaviour (dropping the script) means a SONAME bump.
No, changing an API without changing the ABI does not mean a SONAME
bump. SONAMEs are for ABIs, not APIs and one can change without t
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> On mar, 2008-04-01 at 01:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default,
> > > why -Bsymbolic-functions wo
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:35:38AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > 1. Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is appointed FTP-master.
> >
> > 2. Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is made a full Debian Account
> > Manager and is therefore empowered to create and remove developer
> >
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:58:44 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:15:53 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > You are missing the point.
>>
>> > What if the library says "You must call /usr/bin/foo during buil
90 matches
Mail list logo
