Le Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:15:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> * Substantial reorganization and renaming of sections in the Debian
> menu structure. Packages with menu entries should be reviewed to
> see if the menu section has been renamed or if one of the new
>
On Dec 02, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally got through the test builds of all the source packages in sid for
> i386 using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 on a dual core machine. The results as
> before are at http://people.debian.org/~schepler/build-logs/bymaint.html .
Can you e
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:34:28 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:29:28AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> At Debconf earlier this year, I gave a talk about the benefits
>> Comments appreciated.
> As a general comment, before seeing an actual XML-like
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:24:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> according to the doc-base manual (2.3.2.1):
>
> _Section_
> Section where the document belongs; this should follow the
> sections outlined in The Debian Menu sub-policy
>
> (http://www.debian.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 Dec 2007, at 2:21 am, Daniel Schepler wrote:
I finally got through the test builds of all the source packages in
sid for
i386 using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 on a dual core machine. The
results as
before are at http://people.debian.org/~schepl
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071203 09:53]:
> Can you explain the meaning of this failure and how it should be fixed?
>
> make[2]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make
> rule.
That usually means a new make is started without the calling make
realizing it is s
* Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071202 20:43]:
> Relevant parts for detox are:
> /usr/bin/install -c -d /tmp/buildd/detox-1.1.1/debian/tmp/etc
> /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file
> `/tmp/buildd/detox-1.1.1/debian/tmp/etc/detoxrc.sample': No such file or
> directory
>
> So I as
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I finally got through the test builds of all the source packages in sid for
> i386 using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 on a dual core machine. The results as
> before are at http://people.debian.org/~schepler/build-logs/bymaint.html .
Which said:
shishi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdbix-class-htmlwidget-perl
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~andremar/DBIx-Class-HTMLWidget/
* License
On Monday 03 December 2007 05:11:35 am Tim Cutts wrote:
> Well, am-utils lists as building broken packages, but when I looked at
> the log, it was just that the parallel build had produced the multiple
> binary packages in a different order from the serial build. At least,
> that's my interpretati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3 Dec 2007, at 12:43 pm, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Control files of package am-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Depends: libamu4 (= 6.1.5-7), portmap, {+libamu4,+} libc6 (
Hi Bernhard,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:21:45PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> The problem is in upstream's Makefile.in:
thanks for the good explanation. Also to Daniel whose hint already pointed me
in the right direction. Its already fixed in latest upload.
Thanks,
Best Regards
Patrick
--
Dear Reader,
We are two students at the University of Lund, Sweden, currently writing our
bachelor thesis. The focus for this study is the use of bounties in Open Source
Software Development.
If you are an Open Source developer with views on the matter, or if you have
experience from bounties
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:22:49PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > However I don't think there is anything copyrightable in these files;
> > they only contain series of numbers that describe the mappings. Do you
> > people think it could be suitable for main?
> > (Please follow-up on -legal only for
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:34:28PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> In addition to that, just some tiny nitpicking below.
> [...]
I had the same initial reaction, but when I re-read Manoj's
introduction, I think he suggests that this docbook format should be
the *output* of an XSLT tool; the va
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I think there is a problem using build dependencies for that purpose:
> There are dozens of reasons why you want to build-depend on libfoo-dev
> >= version that do NOT involve working around bugs in the library at
> runtime. There are so many that it would
Hi,
Le dimanche 02 décembre 2007 à 17:11 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> An idea that came up is to use a per-dependent package information
> provided by the maintainer such as the build-deps version [2]. It
> would require a map from deps to build-deps and could typically be
> combined with t
Le dimanche 02 décembre 2007 à 19:35 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> I think there is a problem using build dependencies for that purpose:
> There are dozens of reasons why you want to build-depend on libfoo-dev
> >= version that do NOT involve working around bugs in the library at
> runtime. There
On Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 17:33:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Every successful call to pkg-config would fill in a file, let’s say
> debian/pkgconfig.deps, that would in the end contain:
>
> # pkgconfig_file required_version dev_package shared_package
> version
> x11 1.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:36:43PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 02 décembre 2007 à 19:35 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > I think there is a problem using build dependencies for that purpose:
> > There are dozens of reasons why you want to build-depend on libfoo-dev
> > >= version t
Hi Manoj,
On Saturday 01 December 2007 07:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> At Debconf earlier this year, I gave a talk about the benefits
> of creating language for a lintian/linda check whenever we introduce a
> new policy rule (when appropriate, and feasible, of course)...
I've completly
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: brad
Version : 0.2_2007-01-08
Upstream Author : Francesco Anselmo
* URL : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/brad/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descriptio
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:21:10 -0500, Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:34:28PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> In addition to that, just some tiny nitpicking below. [...]
> I had the same initial reaction, but when I re-read Manoj's
> introduction, I think he
Hi,
well, waiting more than five weeks for an answer to a question
that at least I would regard as urgent seems to show enough
patience. The only conclulsion I could draw is that menu is
not really maintained any more. I'm particularly interested
in this question because if this is the case I s
Hello,
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 02, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I finally got through the test builds of all the source packages in sid for
>> i386 using dpkg-buildpackage -j3 on a dual core machine. The results as
>> before are at http://people.debia
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:24:42PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> well, waiting more than five weeks for an answer to a question
> that at least I would regard as urgent seems to show enough
> patience. The only conclulsion I could draw is that menu is
> not really maintained any more. I'
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Bill Allombert wrote:
Indeed another conclusion you just drawn was that I never actually
received your email. I am not subscribed to debian-devel, and I
did not post to that list. Instead I posted to debian-devel-announce.
My email ended in debian-devel for reasons I did not
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 11:51:25PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> My problem is that after 8 years the first menu file that is
> actually using it broke a script in cdd-common and I have no
> idea how to fix this because there is no description of this
> format.
>
> >I don't see how it is relevant
Hi
as I just modified parts of my code generating the removals overview
page to deal with more kinds of broken bug titles for removal bugs, a
small mail about it:
Please use a bug title format of ($PACKAGE is the source package)
RM: $PACKAGE -- REASON
for a full removal request or
RM: $PACKAGE [$
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:24:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
(http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html#s2.1).
Required field.
>>
>> I am wondering if when a .doc-base file is not updated, it makes the
doc-base 0.8
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:28:08PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> On 3 Dec 2007, at 12:43 pm, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>> Control files of package am-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format)
>>
>> Dep
It's been brought to my attention that liferea, while being able to
use wget, curl, gwget and kget to download feed attachments, does not
Recommend or Suggest any of them, or their alternatives.
Since I'd rather not maintain a long list of possible file
downloaders, I tried but failed to find some
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Bill Allombert wrote:
The menu entry format is not documented in the menu policy, so this
discard #447389.
Well, you are right that policy should not _describe_ the menu format,
but policy should definitely _mention_ that there are at least two formats
and should give an _a
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> The menu entry format is not documented in the menu policy, so this
>> discard #447389.
> Well, you are right that policy should not _describe_ the menu format,
> but policy should definitely _mention_ that t
[Full quote because Bill was not in your CC list.]
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Bill Allombert wrote:
The menu entry format is not documented in the menu policy, so this
discard #447389.
Well, you are right that pol
35 matches
Mail list logo
