* Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071016 17:50]:
> Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
> following bdb versions installed:
>
> version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
> libdb4.2 40
> libdb4.3 26
> libdb4.4 55
> libdb4.5 64
> libdb4.6 4
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:33:20PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
> > > following bdb versions installed:
> > > version: # of
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:37:21AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
> If you want to help reducing this number, a good point would helping
> getting more documentation about the different versions (and their
> differences) available, and (at least for me) make some backports of the
> suggested ver
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > IMHO we should declare a quarantine of a minimum of 6 months on every new
> > libdb upstream, and only package it *if* openldap (*the* heavy-duty user of
> > libdb advanced features) and cyrus imap (*the* thousands-of-concurrent-
> > locks, mmap-happy
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB upstream,
> OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a consequence of abusing the
> interface, not of using "advanced features". I'm not sure why the burden
> h
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 11:34 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Thus I intend to hijack gpsd, it would be maintained by me within the
> debian-gis team, which would also open a way for the currently listed
> maintainer to work on the package if he decides to be active again.
> Please let me know if anybo
Hi Tilman,
> just for the record, since after the fact: I am quite happy with you
> taking over gpsd. I have been bogged down with real life and work more
> and more within the last year. I always hoped to find some time to
> devote to gpsd "some time soon". Alas, I have to accept that this was
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: detox
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Doug Harple
* URL : http://detox.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : utility to cleanup f
Hi!
I've just uploaded a new swish-e package. I've updated the filter rules
and added a sample swish.config file to easily index all kind of
OOo/MSoffice files (ppt, doc, xls). It's based on a running setup which indexes
100GB of office files daily.
Feel free to test and report any bug !
Cheers,
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld schrieb:
3) Autodetection
My approach would be to have the autobuilders use "build-arch", and if
that fails within 60 seconds, "clean" and "build".
If "build-arch" is not implemented, it fails rather quickly, so we use
"build" and make a note in the build log. Later,
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Bits from the Testing Security team"):
> Decompression is typicly something that is i/o bound, not cpu bound.
If the package is stored on disk and not in buffer cache. However, in
many cases the package will have been just downloaded and so on a big
memory machine like a
Ian Jackson, 2007-10-17 15:00:55 +0100 :
[...]
> And if there is no good reason to have the decompressors bound in
> then having that facility wired into the code is just extra
> complexity to no useful purpose.
I thought the ability to just copy one binary (/usr/bin/dpkg) from one
box to anothe
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sez:
> Having 5 different versions of one library is just insane imho. What are
Maybe you could help out with the bugs here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:00:58 +0200
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB
> > upstream, OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a
> > conseq
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Indeed on modern multicore systems running the decompression in a
> > > separate process allows it to be run on a separate CPU, in parallel to
> > > the other processing done by dpkg proper. So it might be faster.
> > >
> > > (I ha
Hi,
This thread started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The process that should be followed for
0-day NMUs is being discussed. (reminder: it's allowed to do 0-day NMUs
for RC bugs and release goals, for bugs older than 7 days).
Please continue the discussion on -devel@, as it's of interest to
everybody.
On
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gnome-device-manager
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~david/gnome-device-manager/
* License : GPL
Pr
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:40:04PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > > ... surprised to learn that git-import-dsc can only import one
> > > .deb per repo.
> > This indeed is a limitation of git-import-dsc that could quiet simply be
> > fixed if this should be needed.
>
> I'm not sure this is totally trivial t
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:15:11PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear there. I'm not advocating total chaos
> inside any single repo, or any group of repos maintained by the same
> people. Localised consistency in these things is highly desirable,
> for all the reasons you mention
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'd like to orphan the libapache2-mod-auth-pam. New maintainer can
choose YADA based package from Debian or CDBS package from Ubuntu.
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi.
I'd like to orphan the Debian package libapache2-mod-auth-plain and
the upstream hosted on Alioth http://mod-auth-plain.alioth.debian.org/
This package provides the simplest authorization for Apache. Also the
htpasswd file can be hold in current directory for h
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:03:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> This thread started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The process that should be followed
> for
> 0-day NMUs is being discussed. (reminder: it's allowed to do 0-day NMUs
> for RC bugs and release goals, for bugs older than 7 days).
>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi.
I'd like to orphan the litmus package.
It is available the new upstream version and some simple bugs have to
be resolved.
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi.
I'd like to orphan the libapache-mod-rpaf package. This package is
really useful is the mod_proxy or squid is used before Apache.
Probably the package should be renamed to libapache2-mod-rpaf and the
dependecies on Apache 1.3 have to be removed.
--
.''`.P
Dear Debian developers,
Bidding adieu to the old Fortran compiler and using gfortran is one of
the proposed Lenny release goals[1]. However, the showstoppes,
definitely, are lapack3 and atlas. There hasn't been any movement on
that side, and it seems that the packages could do with some help.
Thi
Hi My Name is Holly
I am bored and would love some company
I love to chat online and meet new people
If you want I can send you some photos email me for the pics
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo
