On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:03:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The solution is indeed to have a proper Build-Depends.
Also, it is a good idea to disable feature autodetection and enable
wanted compile-time features explicitly, like this:
./configure --enable-packager-mode --enable-foo --enable
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:03:15 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If I understand correctly it is recommended to use pbuilder for
> > packaging and I've done so when I updated packages recently. Then I got
> > a bug report that a nice feature was suddenly
Hi,
On Wed, September 19, 2007 07:42, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Recently, perhaps mainly due to so many spams, it looks common
> to write email address like "foo at some.where" etc. and I wonder if it is
> acceptable to use such modified email address in Upstream Author field of
> debian/copyright f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libemail-send-io-perl
Version : 2.200
Upstream Author : Casey West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Em
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:57:36PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> One additional question. In case MTA, for example, there are
> many candidates including virtual package for Build-Depends.
>
> I guess "exim4-daemon-light | mail-transport-agent"
> will be acceptable. Is this okay?
Why would yo
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:16:43 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:57:36PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > One additional question. In case MTA, for example, there are
> > many candidates including virtual package for Build-Depends.
> >
> > I guess "exim4-daemon-lig
> It's lynx-cur and it has an ability to mail so it is
> necessary to know what MTA is available, I guess.
Guessing does not help here, figure it out by reading the
configure/Makefile or whatever it is using to build, and patch it so it
doesn't rely on an installed MTA. Instead it should assume s
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 18:00:06 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> It's lynx-cur and it has an ability to mail so it is
> necessary to know what MTA is available, I guess.
>
There should be a way to tell it to use /usr/lib/sendmail, without
having that installed.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 06:00:06PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> It's lynx-cur and it has an ability to mail so it is
> necessary to know what MTA is available, I guess.
Is it not possible to tell it? Something like
--with-sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finla
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:01:45 +0200 (CEST), "Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote:
> On Wed, September 19, 2007 07:42, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Recently, perhaps mainly due to so many spams, it looks common
> > to write email address like "foo at some.where" etc. and I wonder if it is
> > acceptable to use such
Hello David,
Am 2007-09-17 19:46:20, schrieb David Given:
> You've got two major tasks ahead of you:
>
> - - port gcc
OK, it seems that parts of gcc went used under Windows...
Maybe it will "easy" to port it native to Linux.
> - - port the kernel
Since it is a All-In-On-Chip, there is not real
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-09-17 19:46:20, schrieb David Given:
> > For the former, you'll need to write a new gcc backend targeting your
> > architecture, and then add support to binutils to allow programs to be
> > linked.
> > This is not easy. gc
Here are the FeedBlitz updates for debian-devel@lists.debian.org
__
** "World Celebrity Supermodels" - 1 new article -
http://celebritymodels.blogspot.com/
- Maria Menounos
- More Recent Articles
- Search World Celebrity Supermodels
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-09-17 19:46:20, schrieb David Given:
[...]
> > Now you have both a compiler and a kernel, you can use your
> > compiler to generate a userland --- as set of basic binaries to
> > get your system up and running --- and then
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: uriparser
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Weijia Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sebastian Pipping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://uriparser.sourceforge.net
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libspiff
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Sebastian Pipping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libspiff.sourceforge.net
* License : BS
Hi
Debian Live is a live CD system based on Debian:
http://debian-live.alioth.debian.org/
Debian-live uses a unionfs system. The root filesystem is squashfs.
Let's look at exim4 on such a system. The init.d script seems to
misbehave:
debian:~# cat /var/run/exim4/exim.pid
5399
debian:~# ls -l /
Forgot to mention: Please CC me your replies, as I don't read the list.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:49:54PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Debian Live is a live CD system based on Debian:
> http://debian-live.alioth.debian.org/
>
> Debian-live uses a unionfs system. The root filesystem is s
On Wed September 19 2007 12:49:54 pm Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Let's look at exim4 on such a system. The init.d script seems to
> misbehave:
<...>
I started running into this (afaict) last fall
(see bugs #396944, #440657).
> What can be done about this?
>
> 1. Avoid using --exec . Probably risking s
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:27:12 +0200
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag 18 September 2007 schrieb Ken Spath:
> > If after I install casu or netdiag, I type man casu or man netdiag
> > there is nothing.
> >
> > whereis / find / apt-cache search / apt-file search were necessary
Ken Spath wrote:
> Proposal regarding future packaging:
>
> Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
> the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
> conflict with an existant necessary manual page AND IF there is no
> binary in a package that is th
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 the mental interface of
Adeodato Simó told:
[...]
> uriparser has the following features:
> .
> * strictly compliant to RFC 3986, implementing:
> + parsing
> + reference resolution
> + recomposition
> + syntax-based normalization
> * fast (linear input len
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Ken Spath wrote:
>> Proposal regarding future packaging:
>>
>> Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
>> the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
>> conflict with an existant necessary manual page AND IF there is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
[...]
> I like this idea, especially if there were a short description about each
> program and relevent configuration files.
I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one of the
biggest holes in Debian
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 5:43:03 pm David Given wrote:
> John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I like this idea, especially if there were a short description about
> > each program and relevent configuration files.
>
> I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one of t
On Wed September 19 2007 04:53:10 pm John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 5:43:03 pm David Given wrote:
> > John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > I like this idea, especially if there were a short description
> > > about each program and relevent configuration files.
> >
>
Le Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:08:40AM +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit :
>
> For what it's worth, we don't do that. References I'm aware of:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/05/msg00092.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/05/msg00149.html
Hi Anthony,
thank for the lin
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There should be a way to tell it to use /usr/lib/sendmail, without
> having that installed.
/usr/sbin/sendmail, please. I realize that we'll have to keep both
essentially forever, but /usr/sbin is the correct FHS location.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PR
Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recently, perhaps mainly due to so many spams, it looks common to
> write email address like "foo at some.where" etc. and I wonder if it
> is acceptable to use such modified email address in Upstream Author
> field of debian/copyright file.
IANADD, but
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thank for the links. So in the end, am I right to say that, since
> the point of view of the FTP team is that RFC are software,
> orig.tar.gz files which contain them fail to comply the DFSG and
> therefore are not accepted in main?
No. Whether or not
Nathanael Nerode said:
> Non-free material is being included in main for the benefit of *precisely
> zero*
> users.
Speaking of non-free material which benefits precisely many users, I've
been wanting to ask if there has been any further movement in the fix
to the GFDL. Currently bash info docs
On Thursday 20 September 2007 04:44, Ben Finney wrote:
> Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Recently, perhaps mainly due to so many spams, it looks common to
> > write email address like "foo at some.where" etc. and I wonder if it
> > is acceptable to use such modified email address in
A recent discussion back in August, in -devel, showed that the current
common trick of using a "Homepage:" pseudo-field in binary packages'
descriptions is not really optimal.
In the discussion, it was pointed that dpkg, as of 1.14.6, supports
the use of a "Homepage:" field in debian/control.
As
33 matches
Mail list logo
