Ken Spath wrote:
> Proposal regarding future packaging:
>
> Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
> the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
> conflict with an existant necessary manual page AND IF there is no
> binary in a package that is the same as the package name.
I like this idea, especially if there were a short description about each
program and relevent configuration files.
% man foo
foo2oof: Turns foo into oof
oof2foo: Returns oof to foo
foo.cgi: Foo translator suitable as a CGI
foo.rc: Site-wide settngs for foo-bin and oof-bin
SEE ALSO:
foo2oof(1), oof2foo(1), foo.cgi(1), foo.rc(5)
This will work in xman a lot better than dpkg -L. This is also
value-added over dpkg -L.
--
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http ((((
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[
as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html ((((
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
