Packages with RFCs deleted

Le Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:50:04PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit : > > We're pretty much at an impasse, then, so I don't think I'll reply > after this message. I, and many Debian folks, don't quite understand > the essential difference, between functional source code and > non-functional documen

Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?

/From/: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > AFAIK, Ubuntu has introduced a new package called "ghostscript" (as successor of gs-gpl) which supersedes gs-esp, gs-gpl and gs-afpl and provides dummy/transitional packages for gs-esp/gs-gpl which depend on the ghostscript pac

Re: Packages with RFCs deleted

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:05:08AM +, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:50:04PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit : > > > > We're pretty much at an impasse, then, so I don't think I'll reply > > after this message. I, and many Debian folks, don't quite understand > > the essenti

check for non-free firmware (Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom)

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Please could you add some check in debian/rules to prevent non-free firmware from inadvertingly entering the linux-2.6 package, as described in the mail quoted below? On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:29:29AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 12 Se

Re: There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?

On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 03:31:42PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Romain and DDevelopers, > > I was wondering if there is any sense/intent to reincarnate > emacs-snapshot in experimental or unstable. > > On the way to emacs23 there are quite a few of nice features had > been introduced alr

Bug#442251: check for non-free firmware (Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom)

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org On Friday 14 September 2007 12:33, Robert Millan wrote: > Please could you add some check in debian/rules to prevent non-free > firmware from inadvertingly entering the linux-2.6 package, as descri

Bug#442254: ITP: policykit-gnome -- GNOME dialogs for PolicyKit

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: policykit-gnome Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~david/PolicyKit-gnome/ * License : GPL Programming

Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:12PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:31:22AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > > > I cannot understand why transition like this one are done in Ubuntu rather > > than in Debian? > > If they were done directly in Debian, ubuntu could benefit from

Tell a Friend - FREE! lilDevil Pill with Love Frequency - download now!

lilDevil Pill with Love Frequency FREE! DOWNLOAD NOW! Love is Good for Everybody! DON`T SLEEP! TRY IT TONIGHT! http://www.casanovanightmusical.com/lildevilpill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:31:22AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > I cannot understand why transition like this one are done in Ubuntu rather > than in Debian? > If they were done directly in Debian, ubuntu could benefit from the result > as well since they synchronize their repositories regul

Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:12PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:31:22AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > > > I cannot understand why transition like this one are done in Ubuntu rather > > than in Debian? > > If they were done directly in Debian, ubuntu could benefit from

seemingly random SATA disk lockup with ICH5: amazing way to ask for more info on the BTS

>> Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 >> Version: 2.6.21-6 >> Severity: important > >stopped reading at that point, there is newer linux images >in the archive install them directly from unstable. Amazing. Tell me, are your trying to turn debian support/BTS into a joke? If one need to run the bran

Re: seemingly random SATA disk lockup with ICH5: amazing way to ask for more info on the BTS

Mathieu Roy wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 Version: 2.6.21-6 Severity: important stopped reading at that point, there is newer linux images in the archive install them directly from unstable. The version specified is the version in testing... Amazing. Tell me, are your trying to tu

Re: seemingly random SATA disk lockup with ICH5: amazing way to ask for more info on the BTS

Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007, Luk Claes a écrit : > Well for packages with many changes and many users it's not always easy > to debug every single problem. So sometimes it's a great help if bug > submitters test if the problem still occurs in the latest version... Hello Luk, I concur. But, st

uVme Online Games get in for FREE

Hello, I am looking to identify a team of ambitious, enthusiastic hungry people who are serious about changing their future by building a substantial online income from this fantastic business opportunity. We have developed a system of help within our team that will enable you to

Processed: Unblock

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unblock 438885 with 375183 Bug#375183: invoke-rc.d: Uses hardcoded path to policy-rc.d Bug#438885: Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d Was blocked by: 341413 341415 348259 348263 353660 367722 367725 367727 367729 367730 367731 367732 367733 367734 3

ITP: libphp-snoopy -- Snoopy is a PHP class that simulates a web browser

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : libphp-snoopy Version: 1.2.3 Upstream Author: Monte Ohrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL: http://snoopy.sourceforge.net/ * License: LGPL 2.1 Description: Snoopy is a PHP class that simulates a web browser It autom

does moreinfo tag now means Iwontsupportthisversion ? [Was Re: Bug#437344: seemingly random SATA disk lockup with ICH5: amazing way to ask for more info on the BTS]

Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007, maximilian attems a écrit : > any unstable kernel installs just fine on testing. > > woow instead of loosing blabla time a simple upgrade could have > been done long ago. i told you the reality 2.6.21 is _not_ supported. > it is also certainly not the version with whi

Re: Packages with RFCs deleted

Le Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > With your argument, gcc would be in non-free right now... This is why it has been proposed on this list that original sources containing non-free elements that are not part of the software could be allowed in main, as long as n

Re: Packages with RFCs deleted

Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Much of the free software development is about creating replacements > of non-free component to build a free OS with free applications. If so, that's an effect, not the goal. The goal isn't about "creating replacements", it's about increasing freedom f