Re: Bug#430176: ITP: sorting-hat -- program to sort Debian Developers

On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 02:50:44AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: sorting-hat > Version : 1.0.0 > Upstream Author : Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL :

Re: Bug#430176: ITP: sorting-hat -- program to sort Debian Developers

also sprach David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.06.26.1236 +0200]: > That'd be Gryffindor... > > [snip] Good to see that some of us are doing actual work. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debia

Re: Bug#430176: ITP: sorting-hat -- program to sort Debian Developers

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 12:53:20PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: >> That'd be Gryffindor... > Good to see that some of us are doing actual work. Yeah, like maintaining X: http://pr0n.sesse.net/debconf7/1024x768/dsc_0490.jpg Time to move to debian-curiosa, perhaps :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepag

Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?"): > In 3 years and a half, I had the time to try all of that... > So I will try something new: an online petition: > > If you would like bug #229357 to get an answer, please > send a signed email to the buglog. Pleas

Re: (glibc's opinion on malloc) Re: Bug#430140: ITP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory allocator

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:07:55AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > WWW: > The problem with this theory (basically, that glibc is taking a > performance penalty by

Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:33:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for > lenny?"): > > In 3 years and a half, I had the time to try all of that... > > So I will try something new: an online petition: > > > > If you would like bug #22

Re: synchronizing README.Debian with wiki.debian.org

Hi, On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:12, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > I had an idea and still pondering on it. I wanted to do automatic > two-way synchronization with README.Debian and wiki.debian.org Newer moinmoin versions can export to sgmldoc, see for example http://wiki.skolelinux.no/Dokumentasjo

Bug#430686: ITP: libapp-control-perl -- Perl module for apachectl style control of another script or

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libapp-control-perl Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Programming Lang

Bug#430725: ITP: webboard -- Copy and paste to a public pastebin server

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: webboard Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Sebastian Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : https://launchpad.net/webboard/ * Lic

Bug#430721: RFA: refit -- graphical bootloader for EFI-based ia32 systems

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I need someone to pick this package up; I haven't had enough time to look after this, and this package needs more care. There's a new upstream, which possibly requires newer gnu-efi to build, but upstream doesn't really use gcc, and usually requires some work to

yatex のメンテナンス

こんにちは、 小林さんが最近メールをしていたので気になって調べてみました。 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428462 （new upstream: 1.73 リリース） yatex は oldstable の時代（4年前）からアップデートされていません。 前回どういうことになっていたかということを発掘してみましたが、ドキュメ ントのライセンスについて検討をしており、non-free なのでまずいね、とい うところまで検討していました。 http://lists.debian.or.jp/debian-devel/20

Bug#430724: RFA: linux-uvc -- Linux Kernel USB Video Class module

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would like someone to pick this package up, I have not had enough time to properly maintain this package. This is a kernel module, and requires some merging of MacBook iSight patch which probably is not (yet) merged upstream. New upstream releases happened and are

Re: yatex のメンテナンス

sorry, wrong mailing list. re-sending the same mail to @jp. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

Ian Jackson wrote: > While we are at it we should write a specification for Build-Options, > something like: > > The Build-Options field appears (only) in the first stanza in > debian/control. It gives a whitespace-separated list of options. > The meanings of these options is defined in pol

Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

Bill Allombert wrote: > + The syntax is a list of options separated by > + commas that are implemented in the build process. > + The following options are defined: If commas are used as delimiters, it should use ", " as the delimiter for consistency with other fields u

Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it would also be useful to include 'nostrip' and 'noopt' in the > Build-Options field, as a way to indicate that the package implements > those DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. parallel=n as well, while we're at it. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: synchronizing README.Debian with wiki.debian.org

Hi, > On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:12, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > > I had an idea and still pondering on it. I wanted to do automatic > > two-way synchronization with README.Debian and wiki.debian.org > > Newer moinmoin versions can export to sgmldoc, see for example > > http://wiki.skolelinux

Re: Official presentation template

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:52:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > [Vor DebConf visitors: I'm just replying into a thread that was started in > Debian-devel list and which concerns more or less the LaTeX beamer BOF > https://penta.debconf.org/~joerg/events/34.en.html ] It would be nice if you upl

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Official presentation template

On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 02:32:56AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Oh, and if a design was settled, it would be really nice to have the design > implemented in some other presentation toolkits (besides beamer) such as OO's > impress or Kpresenter. For the benefit of those that do not

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Submission

Hey, all. I *think* I have a working submission for the contrib section of Debian mainline; this is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] download-and-install wrapper that I was discussing a couple days ago. I'm rather new at this, so I don't know exactly how I should proceed. What is the process for screen

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Submission

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zachary Palmer wrote: > I'm rather new at this, so I don't know exactly how I should proceed. > What is the process for screening my package? > Is this the appropriate mailing list to discuss the matter? The debian-mentors list is probably a better

Re: yatex のメンテナンス

Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sorry, wrong mailing list. > re-sending the same mail to @jp. But it made me run $ apt-cache show yatex [...] Recommends: ptex-bin|ptex-jtex, tetex-bin [...] Description: Yet Another TeX mode for Emacs Please replace tetex-bin with texlive - this i

Re: Official presentation template

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, W. Borgert wrote: I like LaTeX, but I use DocBook XML slides as source and S5-HTML as output for presentations. I have a simple debianesque CSS, I can share. This is perfectly OK. The intention was not to restrict our ideas to LaTeX. I have no ideas in how far the layout