Re: May one use ~rc1 within versions although older lintians are complaining?

Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a > >> version number like

What is the reason glibc is at version 2.3 for etch?

Hi, I've been discussing with some #fluendo people about their codecs not being compatible with etch (requires glibc 2.4+). Can anyone give a brief answer to why etch will be shipping the glibc at 2.3. I couldn't provide an explanation as to why it is only 2.3 being shipped. Thanks, Lex. -- T

Re: What is the reason glibc is at version 2.3 for etch?

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:23:21PM +1100, Lex Hider wrote: > Hi, > I've been discussing with some #fluendo people about their codecs not being > compatible with etch (requires glibc 2.4+). too bad for them. > Can anyone give a brief answer to why etch will be shipping the glibc at 2.3. > I cou

Re: co-mentor for a GSoC proposal wanted: debbugs web submission

Hi, On Friday 16 March 2007 00:49, Steve Langasek wrote: > A large fraction of bug reports are bad or incomplete, so you need to > ensure that you can contact bug submitters for more information. > > HTTP doesn't give you a callback mechanism, so you need to be able to tie > the web submission bac

Re: May one use ~rc1 within versions although older lintians are complaining?

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava: >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>

Re: May one use ~rc1 within versions although older lintians are complaining?

Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava: > >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>

Re: Problems packaging a kernel using cdbs

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:03:46 -0400, Luis R Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > My goal is to actually generate a debian package which will have a > very small x86 kernel and a very very custom initramfs (bundles of > software) for a PXE boot environment. Kernel-package lets me build a > debian

Re: Problems packaging a kernel using cdbs

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:26:36 -0400, Luis R Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 3/19/07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Anyway -- I just tried to use "make-kpkg build" as the build >> > commands for my "kernel" targe

Re: co-mentor for a GSoC proposal wanted: debbugs web submission

Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 16 March 2007 00:49, Steve Langasek wrote: >> A large fraction of bug reports are bad or incomplete, so you need to >> ensure that you can contact bug submitters for more information. >> >> HTTP doesn't give you a callback mechanism, so you need

Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. The reason for the problem: 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verification failed for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\nCalled: 207.44.202.99\nSent: RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\nResponse: 550

Re: Message could not be delivered

Ich bin der automatische Emailbeantworter von: Manjo. Aufgrund massivem Spams habe ich mich dazu entschlossen mein derzeitges Postfach aufzugeben und mir eine neue eMail-Adresse anzulegen. Bitte schick' mir deine eMail noch einmal, an diese Adresse: http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/4697/emaila

BerliOS watch files & uscan

Hi, I recently removed the watch file from fetchmail because it stopped working because of user agent restrictions at the BerliOS site. However, since other maintainers wrote some similar stuff on mailing lists I just wanted to let you know that I talked to Lutz Henckel from BerliOS and it was

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:23:51AM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: > > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. > The reason for the problem: > 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verification failed for <[EMAIL > PROT

interesado en promotora inmobiliaria

Estimados Srs: Somos Telepymer, una organizacion de diseñadores 3d freelances, especializados en diseño final de perspectivas de cualquier tipo de edificio, zona a construir e interiorismo. Nuestras realizaciones virtuales de estos entornos a partir de planos y/o requerimientos del cliente, son

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz: > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: > > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. > The reason for the problem: > 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verification failed for <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>\nCalled: 207.44.202.99\nSent: RC

Bug#415844: ITP: python-fpconst -- Utilities for handling IEEE 754 floating point special values

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-fpconst Version : 0.7.2 Upstream Author : Gregory R. Warnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://research.warnes.net/projects/rzope/fpconst/ http://www.pyt

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:01:20PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz: > > > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: > > > > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. > > The reason for the problem: > > 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verific

auditd -- User space tools for 2.6 kernel SELinux auditing

Hello! I've put some work into creating a first version of a Debian package of audit-1.5.1 for private use, which you can get from http://pint.pmhahn.de/pmhahn/debian/etch/a/audit/ Perhaps you can take a look at it and provide some feedback to get it into shape for official upload to Debian. One

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz: >> Why bother distributing it over the mailing list? It's rather likely >> you can't contact the author of that message because his or her >> mailing system is thoroughly misconfigured. > > Is 'forced to relay through a gateway' an instance of 'thoroughly > misconfigu

Bug#415862: ITP: why -- A software verification tool

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: why Version : 2.02 Upstream Author : Jean-Christophe Filliâtre * URL : http://why.lri.fr/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: OCaml Description : A software verificat

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. > The reason for the problem: > 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verification failed for <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>\nCalled: 207.4

Re: auditd -- User space tools for 2.6 kernel SELinux auditing

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:11:10 +0100, Philipp Matthias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hello! I've put some work into creating a first version of a Debian > package of audit-1.5.1 for private use, which you can get from > http://pint.pmhahn.de/pmhahn/debian/etch/a/audit/ > Perhaps you can take

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

On to, 2007-03-22 at 10:43 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > Is 'forced to relay through a gateway' an instance of 'thoroughly > misconfigured'? Or is it just a corner case not worth bothering for? > > (I'm not _quite_ trolling. I'd like to know if I ought to spend the > effort to change

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:23:51AM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: > > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. > The reason for the problem: > 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-"Verification failed for <[EMAIL > PROT

Re: Alioth lists are too strict in checking senders

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:31:00AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:23:51AM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got: > > > > The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. > > The reason for the problem: >

Ligue Grátis com o seu MSN

Ligar do seu MSN Messenger para celular e telefone fixo sem pagar nada... Acabou a era do Skype. Foi lançado MSN VOIP, um software que você instala no seu MSN e com ele você poderá discar para celulares ou telefones fixo sem pagar taxas de uso. Basta instalar e sair ligando Maiores informações

Work-needing packages report for Mar 23, 2007

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 367 (new: 0) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 83 (new: 1) Total number of packages requeste