I know of a way that maintainers could be increased substantially (I
expect hundreds to many thousands a year).
I am not sure of the specifics but I have little doubt that in the end
it would work.
It will likely take more than four years to implement and only work in
England.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Bedogni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: krecordmydesktop
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Dusan Zatkovsky
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/krecmydesktop/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Hi Stefano,
If I got it right, XS-Vcs is to point to VC of a debian packaging, not
the original upstream sources. That would be useful to have both - links
to Debian packaging as well as to original upstream. For instance
my VC keeps only debian-related changes and uses mergeWithUpstream
provided
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:36:34PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> > Milan P Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd like to discuss problem with regards to bug #372665.
> > Why the racoon should be started in the rcS when even ssh is not?
>
> The reasons should be fairly obvious from
Now that I am aware about openssh bsd vs openssh portable ( ;-) ), I looked at
the CVS of portable SSH (following [1]) to see what/when it really happened -
so it wasn't a BSD specific patch, it was only adopted by bsd team in 2002 but
was in portable ssh since 1.2.2p1 (Mar 2000). I am not sure on
Hello Michael,
I have simpel signed my /debian/duats/etch/Release file with
an external signature /debian/duats/etch/Release.gpg and
imported the public key I have used for it.
So whats the problem?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Netwo
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 07:27:29PM -0500, David Nusinow
wrote:
> Simply replying to a bug won't get it fixed any sooner or
> decrease the impact it has on the user. In addition, it
> distracts us from doing what is potentially far more
> productive work.
Writing a mail to a bug along the lines of
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 10:33 +, Howard Young wrote:
> I know of a way that maintainers could be increased substantially (I
> expect hundreds to many thousands a year).
> I am not sure of the specifics but I have little doubt that in the end
> it would work.
> It will likely take more than four
My earlier message was very over the top it would appear.
I had a look while on lunch and tracked down some statistics.
http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SBU/b000266/154-t17a.htm
See the line for GNVQ Advanced IT.
If this line is accurate then the number of people completing the course
year b
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:57:46AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit
wrote:
> And I think the list can grow larger just by looking at
> the reality, and not dreaming stupid ideas and trying to
> defend them.
snip
> Just _look_ at that: [0]. I mean _look_, not pretend to.
> Instead of answering to th
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:07:33PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Now, the iceape case is interesting: *you* (as in, the one
> complaining about rotting bugs) are also allowed to help
> the maintainers instead of whining.
One very positive thing from this thread is the number of
packages / teams that
Nico Golde schrieb:
> what about the following idea.
> If a configuration file is marked as conffile in a package
> you have the possibility to select between:
>
> - Install the new version of the configuration file from the
> package
> - Keep your current installed version of the file
> - Vie
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Jon Dowland wrote:
> I think that there is an untapped pool of people who could
> help a lot with the triage work, but the question is, where
> do they start? How do they know that they are welcome to
> start responding to a given packages bugs with some kind of
> analysis?
just to throw in my $0.02,
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 18:43 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I haven't tested your patch, but I like the general idea.
>
> A good example is exim4. Where I have greylistd installed and configured
> it to allow SSL connections. Every once in a while exim gets an update
>
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ,-
> | revision 1.17
> | date: 2000/03/03 11:35:33; author: damien; state: Exp; lines: +9 -1
> | - Don't permanently fail on bind() if getaddrinfo has more choices left for
> | us. Needed to work around messy IPv6 on Linux. Patch from Arkad
Karen Schmidtman
Logistics Analyst
SPARTA
Satellite Control Network Contract
719-637-5601
I am NOT an authorized purchasing agent, I am only authorized to gather
information regarding a part(s), availability,location, and budgetary
data such as cost and lead time.
NOTICE: This communic
Hi,
* sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-05 19:07]:
> just to throw in my $0.02,
>
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 18:43 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > I haven't tested your patch, but I like the general idea.
> >
> > A good example is exim4. Where I have greylistd installed and configured
> > i
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 19:23 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> The implementation was not really difficult, the patch file
> itself is 200 lines alltogether.
not bad :) i have to admit i haven't looked at the patch.
> > would be to see the differences between the new maintainer conffile and
> > the p
> > So it IPv6 still messy? if not, then probably this patch indeed could be
> > safely deapplied I guess ;-)
> This is probably referring to binding an IPv6 :: socket and getting IPv4
> for free
and if socket on IPv4 is taken already? this is what lead to the
original issue.
So should that "cont
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:35:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:07:33PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Now, the iceape case is interesting: *you* (as in, the one
> > complaining about rotting bugs) are also allowed to help
> > the maintainers instead of whining.
>
> One ve
See the email I sent after wards. It has the same subject (and sorry, it
is quite long).
In short I suppose the material answer to your question would be:
A set of books and for quick sale of the proposal possibly having a few
people run localized linux terminal servers that allow colleges to h
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and if socket on IPv4 is taken already? this is what lead to the
> original issue.
> So should that "continue" should then be taken only if ai->ai_family ==
> AF_INET6 ?
Maybe. I don't know that part of the code well. Looking at INN, we ran
into
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:02:29AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> If I got it right, XS-Vcs is to point to VC of a debian packaging, not
> the original upstream sources. That would be useful to have both - links
XS-Vcs point to the repository used by the maintainer to version its
work. If he i
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
lam_7.1.2-1_nl.po
Description: application/gettext
pgpbmhdoEnZ5U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
rkhunter_1.2.9-3_nl.po
Description: application/gettext
pgp2kKqVB7eNX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hey,
* sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-05 20:00]:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 19:23 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > would be to see the differences between the new maintainer conffile and
> > > the previous version of the maintainer conffile.
> > >
> > > to implement this, one would simply nee
Am Montag 05 März 2007 19:59 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > and if socket on IPv4 is taken already? this is what lead to the
> > original issue.
> >
> > So should that "continue" should then be taken only if ai->ai_family ==
> > AF_INET6 ?
>
> Maybe. I d
I'm in a quandary about the future of the slimserver package.
There's a problem with upstream: it contains a significant amount of
non-free stuff, which had to be ripped out of the software before it
went into Debian. This means that the Debian package is missing some
functionality, and that t
Nico Golde a écrit :
> * sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-05 20:00]:
>> anyway, good luck waking up the sleeping dpkg monster.
>
> Sleeping is good, the first bug mentioning the need of a
> merge functionality is 8 years old...
> I can not really understand this since we build up on tools
Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not convinced at all that *funding* a manager would do any good to
> the project.
If we already had a _good_ project manager in our ranks, don't you think
they/he/she would have stepped up already? THAT'S why I think paying for
one might help...
clone 413353 -1
retitle -1 debian-policy: New virtual package: dictd-dictionary
thanks
I'm cloning this bug for "dictd-dictionary".
On March 5, 2007 at 2:14AM +0900,
tats (at vega.ocn.ne.jp) wrote:
> > BTW, I recommend to add a virtual package for a dictionary package
> > which provides /usr/sha
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Based in India ,We are offering a telemarketing program for generating
sales leads-and appointment setting, order procurement on performance basis
We can also arrange outsourcing for any job/assigmnent at about 20% of your
current American costs, like software deve
Dear Debian developers,
I would like to announce TXbook, a GPL
accounting program for small businesses.
It has successfully done my balance sheet and P&L
for an Austrian small "Limited" (Ges.m.b.H.).
With some work it should serve users in the EU region
well; I don't know enough about the acco
On Monday 05 March 2007, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> (exept maybe translators, but they don't do it for the project, they do it
> for them selfs - which is a GOOD thing!
The mere fact that you're able to translate kinda excludes you needing the
translation in the first place (e.g. I translate cau
Hello,
since I'm not only a geek but also a photographer and GIMP user I've
decided to have a look at wnpp bug #398765 [1] and package the plugin
[2]. While packaging gimp-refocus I came across the refocus-it plugin,
which uses a different algorithm and also supports to refocus motion
blur, so I'v
On Mar 05, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is probably referring to binding an IPv6 :: socket and getting IPv4
> for free, so that a subsequent bind to an IPv4 0.0.0.0 address fails. So
> far as I know, this is still the Linux IPv6 behavior.
Yes, but it can be controlled with code
Le Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
>
> Like every packaging team in debian, mailing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] depending on how old the team is. Usually that list
> is in the Maintainer or Uploaders field of the control file.
> #debian-$team is
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 11:25 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Now that I am aware about openssh bsd vs openssh portable ( ;-) ), I looked at
> the CVS of portable SSH
Sorry, the OpenBSD version was the only version web-browseable and I
forgot to refer to the portable version before citing a commi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qfits
Version : 6.2.0
Upstream Author : Yves Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.hq.eso.org/pub/qfits/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Lib
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zack,
>
> The main point of IntelliSense [1] is not about the actual completion
> which type the word after you started typing it, is more about where to
> find the possible completions and, in particular to find them via some
> kind of representati
> "Milan" == Milan P Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> README says that in the /etc/rcS.d/ should go scripts which are
> executed once during boot. In debian policy manual rcS.d is
> mentioned only once in section 9.3.4, but from short description it is
> not clear could the daemons be star
41 matches
Mail list logo
