On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:40:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:54:56 -0600, Jon Marler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I have a question ... How do I keep my Debian maintainer status if I
> > miss the vote? Is there a website I can log in to "r
> > Who would be the right person or committe to talk to at Debian about
> > making fonts for Debian and or other Linux distros?
I think that joining the pkg-fonts-devel team mailing list is the
first step to go, certainly.
We are about a dozen of people who mostly maintain a few font
packages. T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I intend to package libcm:
* Package name: libcm
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : LGPL, GPL, BSD
Progra
Hmm, sorry for these:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Version : x.y.z
0.1.1
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mostly Søren Sandmann for Red Hat.
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
No upstream website I know of.
> * License : LGPL, GPL,
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 09:22 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:40:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:54:56 -0600, Jon Marler
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > I have a question ... How do I keep my Debian maintainer sta
On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Selection of the people included in those runs will be done in a way
> that we avoid sending out such mails to active people. As a good start
> we will take the upcoming DPL vote as an input source, everyone who doesn't
> vote this year wil
Dear developers,
[My post involve only technical issues which are orthogonal to the
current GR which addresses the non-technical issues.]
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35AM +, James Troup wrote:
>Why restrictions on binary uploads?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/07 03:39, Loïc Minier wrote:
[snip]
>> * URL : http://www.example.org/
>
> No upstream website I know of.
FTP site?
Where do you get the source from?
>> * License : LGPL, GPL, BSD
>
> (This is correct.)
It's tri-lic
On 10927 March 1977, Bart Martens wrote:
>> Three week vacation periods are not uncommon.
> Of course, and I'm sure everyone knows that. When I read the
> announcement again, then I see no reason to panic. :)
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/02/msg8.html
> An example, how
On 11/02/07 at 10:29 +, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Whilst you might be able to vote without expressing an opinion,
> we already have a documented MIA process.
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa
>
> I don't think using the single criteria such as DP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: et131x
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/et131x/
* License : BSD liki
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:19:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/02/07 at 10:29 +, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Whilst you might be able to vote without expressing an opinion,
> > we already have a documented MIA process.
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkgin
Jon Marler wrote:
> I have a question ... How do I keep my Debian maintainer status if I
> miss the vote?
A more relevant case are probably people, who don't care about the
annual time-drain aka DPL election.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:19:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I totally agree. If I were forced to reduce my involvement in Debian, I
> would probably start by losing interest in "politics", since I could
> easily trust other, better-informed DD, to make better choices than I
> would do. That w
On 10927 March 1977, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Selection of the people included in those runs will be done in a way
>> that we avoid sending out such mails to active people. As a good start
>> we will take the upcoming DPL vote as an input so
Hi!
I'm working on a communication using UDP sockets and I would like to get the
source code to know exactly what it does and make some proves.
Can anyone tell me where o how I can get the sorce code of the UDP?... now I
just include the but I like to see the functions.
Thanks in advance
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 06:11:40PM +, J HU wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm working on a communication using UDP sockets and I would like to get
> the source code to know exactly what it does and make some proves.
>
> Can anyone tell me where o how I can get the sorce code of the UDP?... now
> I just i
Am Sonntag 11 Februar 2007 19:11 schrieb J HU:
> I'm working on a communication using UDP sockets and I would like to get
> the source code to know exactly what it does and make some proves.
UDP is not defined by some source code but by its RFC documents.
> Can anyone tell me where o how I can ge
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> > No upstream website I know of.
> FTP site?
> Where do you get the source from?
ftp.gnome.org, but not worth mentionning in the package description;
it's mentionned in the copyright of course. I imagin
On 09-Feb-07, 15:13 (CST), "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only problem I see with $() is that older /bin/sh (SunOS) does not
> support $(), but it does support ``.
>
> When I make a /bin/sh, I want it able to be run on a /bin/sh, even if
> that /bin/sh is on SunOS.
Then
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joost Yervante Damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openmsx-debugger
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Edwin Velds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://openmsx.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Friday 09 February 2007 11:11, Jari Aalto wrote:
> I have reported bugs against backtick and suggested to change to use
> the more readable alternative. The result was surprising. To quote
> one message (bug closed reasoning):
>
> "If your development environment cannot display ` differentl
On Sunday 11 February 2007 03:57, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> - miss the WaT mail. Even if you are on vacation for a long time, I
> guess it wont be 3 weeks (vote) plus one or two months (WaT mail
> timeout), and dont you read your backlog when you come back?
What about if the WaT mail is rej
Hi there,
Some shared libraries have gettext translations below /usr/share/locale
with the source package name as textdomain. When such a shared lib
changes SONAME, how are you handling it?
1) check all strings to see whether there are only additions and no
incompatible changes, and
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The only problem I see with $() is that older /bin/sh (SunOS) does not
>> support $(), but it does support ``.
>>
>> When I make a /bin/sh, I want it able to be run on a /bin/sh, even if
>> that /bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/07 12:58, =?//TRANSLIT?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
* URL : http://www.example.org/
>>> No upstream website I know of.
>> FTP site?
>> Where do you get the source from?
>
> ftp.gnome.o
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:50:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/11/07 12:58, =?//TRANSLIT?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> >>> No upstream website I k
"Joerg Jaspert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10927 March 1977, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Selection of the people included in those runs will be done in a way
that we avoid sending out such mails to active pe
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Some shared libraries have gettext translations below /usr/share/locale
> with the source package name as textdomain. When such a shared lib
> changes SONAME, how are you handling it?
> 1) check all strings to see whether there ar
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:12:54 -0700, Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sunday 11 February 2007 03:57, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> - miss the WaT mail. Even if you are on vacation for a long time, I
>> guess it wont be 3 weeks (vote) plus one or two months (WaT mail
>> timeout), and dont
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:42:47 -0500, Joe Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I would hope that there would be a grace period after deactivation,
I suggest you read the original mail before participating in
the discussion.
> where a person who misses the WaT mail, and then later has his/h
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:35:27PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:42:47 -0500, Joe Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I would hope that there would be a grace period after deactivation,
>
> I suggest you read the original mail before pa
Le dimanche 11 février 2007 à 12:50 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Well, the translations really should not be part of the ABI of the library;
> libraries shouldn't be engaging in direct interaction with the user, so the
> use case for localization of libraries is really limited to interfaces su
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 21:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> "so please file installation reports!"
(The follow is also filed in an installation report.)
RAID+LVM /boot doesn't work as of yesterday's build. It seems fixable; a
manual invocation of "update-initramfs -k all -u" in the /target
with /target
Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> Also, by default, CPU frequency scaling is disabled for desktop
> installs. This should be turned on; we are trying to save the world
> after all, aren't we? 130,000+ Debian users with CPU Frequency scaling
> enabled would save a lot of energy with no noticible impact to d
Hi, there
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> To reduce the security risk an unused open account has, and also to
> get the number of Developers to reflect the reality, we, the Debian
> Account Managers, decided to do regular "WaT"[2] runs.
Are you familiar with the MIA Team work? How is this work insufficien
On dim, 2007-02-11 at 15:35 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> an active DD should
> not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?
On dim, 2007-02-11 at 22:49 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
A probable reason is that the NM process is getting tougher and/or that
> some developpers did
On Sunday 11 February 2007 14:22, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > I don't think using the single criteria such as DPL voting is a good,
> > approach.
>
> Now, explain where the problem in my approach is? The worst case that
> can happen to someone who does not vote is that he replies to one
> mail. Its no
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:33:40 +0100, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, there
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> To reduce the security risk an unused open account has, and also to
>> get the number of Developers to reflect the reality, we, the Debian
>> Account Managers, decided to do regular "WaT"[2]
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:39:46 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On dim, 2007-02-11 at 15:35 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> an active DD should not be afraid of passing something we ask of
>> every new developer?
> On dim, 2007-02-11 at 22:49 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: A proba
On dim, 2007-02-11 at 17:18 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> A reduced NM process should be less time consuming than the
> full one, no?
Well, it depends on the steps which are removed from the NM process, and
how this "reduced" process is made. I guess it should be less time
consuming, but I ca
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I think the difference is that the MIA process is too
> conservative,
It starts off being polite, indeed. And patient. You never know the
reason why a person is not so active anymore. Tbm gave a talk about how
it is done and why it is done like that in Oslo, 2003
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:37:33 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On dim, 2007-02-11 at 17:18 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> A reduced NM process should be less time consuming than the full
>> one, no?
> Well, it depends on the steps which are removed from the NM process,
> an
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> A probable reason is that the NM process is getting tougher and/or that
> some developpers didn't even pass an NM process...
Then we are better off without them. I can understandy anyone trying to
avoid NM in the grounds that it is a hassle (as in they'd
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim, 2007-02-11 at 15:35 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > an active DD should
> > not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?
>
> On dim, 2007-02-11 at 22:49 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> A probable reason is that the NM pro
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:43:27 +0100, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I think the difference is that the MIA process is too conservative,
> It starts off being polite, indeed. And patient. You never know the
> reason why a person is not so active anymore. Tbm gave a t
On 10928 March 1977, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, it does. They need to fix their packages, or they get orphaned.
> When no packages are left, we talk to DAM.
No. You(Mia) didnt (in the past).
>> How many other MIA people are undiscovered by our current process?
> I'm sure there are plenty.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:35:27PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ... I mean, getting ones
> status reverted is an inconvenience, but surely an active DD should
> not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?
IIUC if A is the number of people expelled from Debian and if B
Hi mates
> This is the part I'm unsure about. I think, as che recently
> mentioned, he has been missing for years. His packages were
> properly orphaned, but the account cleanup never happened.
>
> I am given the impression that the primary focus of the MIA
> process is taking c
On dim, 2007-02-11 at 22:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > More than difficulty, I think *time* is the problem.
>
> Agreed, but anyone who cannot take the time to vote once an year
> really
> should be asking for his account to be locked for a while (i.e. a
> vacation)
> until he ha
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:47:48AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yeah, you're perfectly right. That's the best advice one could give to
> not so active DD who doesn't want to lose much time («"lose" the time to
> vote so you don't "lose" the time in NM»). But as someone sai
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:47:48AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, you're perfectly right. That's the best advice one could give to
>> not so active DD who doesn't want to lose much time («"lose" the time to
>> vote so you don't "lose" the t
On lun, 2007-02-12 at 08:05 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The difference between a DD and a non-DD is mainly about voting, so if
> a
> DD doesn't have interest in politics, he could just do like a lot of
> non-DD people: have a sponsor.
When dealing with a large set of packages (read "Xfce"), it's
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:53:25PM +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Why not just logging in to merkel and using "mia-todo needs-wat" ?
> As far as I can see right now there are plenty of people listed
> there with no packages and they can be the targets for the first
> run.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/
54 matches
Mail list logo
