On Friday 09 February 2007 11:11, Jari Aalto wrote: > I have reported bugs against backtick and suggested to change to use > the more readable alternative. The result was surprising. To quote > one message (bug closed reasoning): > > "If your development environment cannot display ` differently than ' > , you need to get a new one." > > I'm askinf if it is ok to to reopen such bugs based of better QA > aspects. Possibly by providing patches if the maintainer is busy > elsewhere to handle such a "minor issue" from his perspective.
IMHO: I would be happy to see bugs against my own packages that *clearly* increased usability and readability of code, as long as they included tested, working, patches. But a bug that asks to change coding style just for the sake of style or preference of someone who isn't even working on the software at all wouldn't be as welcome. -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
pgp4G9FHG0Kbc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
