On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:00:40AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:43:17 +0100
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2.2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Ma
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > Changes:
> > lynx (2.8.5-2sarge2.2) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Non-maintainer upload.
> >* Read user configuration from home directory, not current
> > working directory. Closes: #396964
> > Thanks to Tom
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:47:26PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > > Changes:
> > > lynx (2.8.5-2sarge2.2) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
> > >* Non-maintainer upload.
> > >* Read user configuration from home directory, no
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:41:22PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> Is it possible to upload two different versions of the any package to
>> the different architectures? So that you get the -64 version on 64bit
>> archs and the -32 version on 32 b
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061129 13:50]:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides
>> > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #26388
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:00:14AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > There's no possibility of including that patch upstream.
> >
> > So what? If upstream does not want to accept a patch that fixes a
>
> so what? Read the patch. You certainly didn't, or if you _did_ you
> understand nothing of
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 13:44]:
> So I change the priority to what ftpmaster thinks, wait a month for
> the entry to get purged and then change it back to what I think and
> get it?
I would consider this as abuse, and also, that was the reason why I
wrote "(normally)".
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I need exactly the same thing. I was lloking for an include statement
>> for series files though. Something like
>
>> debian/patches/series.common:
>> version.patch
>> foo.patch
>> barf.patch
>
>> debi
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
wrong place. I'd point
* Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 14:12]:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> > a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
>
> It's a #define. But the chang
Hey,bud,happy holiday.
http://forusmedz.com
-
DEMANDTEC EMAIL NOTICE:
NOTICE: This email transmission and all attached files contain information
intended
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:15:42PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 14:12]:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > > I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> > > a #define to me). If apt-get source w
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That isn't very flexible.
> By using cpp I can use #include recursively and at any point of the
> series. I can also use #ifdef or any other cpp construct. I can insert
> an architecture specific patch by enclosing it in #ifdef __arch__. If
> I c
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 13:44]:
>> So I change the priority to what ftpmaster thinks, wait a month for
>> the entry to get purged and then change it back to what I think and
>> get it?
>
> I would consider this as abuse, and al
Another three weeks have passed. I give Anand a last chance to respond as I at
the same time CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 10 November 2006 13:23, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> sa-exim was [1]orphaned on February 12. Four days later, Anand Kumria
> announced his ITA, but he never completed the adopti
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer defines the following tags as reasons to
dismiss a bug report:
* wontfix: the behaviour described can be reproduced or the feature request is
understood; it is indeed an issue with our package but we can't or won't do
anything about it because there are stro
On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be
> reproduced, but it's not a bug, or at least not our fault"? (Bugzilla calls
> this "INVALID").
I agree that it could be useful, since I get a lot of these cases...
--
Hello.
after a base install of Debian Etch, I selected all necessary packages
for a LAMP System - Linux Apache MySQL PHP.
Specifically:
apache-perl 1.3.34-4
php5 5.1.6-5
libapache-mod-php5 5.1.6-5
[and related packages]
But I have to manually edit /etc/apache-perl/httpd.conf and enable
"Add
Patrick Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after a base install of Debian Etch, I selected all necessary packages
> for a LAMP System - Linux Apache MySQL PHP.
> Specifically:
> apache-perl 1.3.34-4
If at all possible, I strongly encourage you to use Apache 2.2 instesad of
Apache 1.x. Apache
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Patrick Frank wrote:
>But I have to manually edit /etc/apache-perl/httpd.conf and enable
>"AddType application/x-httpd-php .php" aswell as
>/etc/apache-perl/modules.conf
>to add "LoadModule php5_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp5.so".
>
>
I demand that Magnus Holmgren may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Often, but not always, the bug can or should be reassigned to another
> package, but then a second user might come around and submit the same bug
> report.
Then, when showing bugs for that package, shouldn't those reassigned bu
hi patrick,
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 19:48 +0100, Patrick Frank wrote:
> apache-perl 1.3.34-4
> php5 5.1.6-5
> libapache-mod-php5 5.1.6-5
> [and related packages]
>
> But I have to manually edit /etc/apache-perl/httpd.conf and enable
> "AddType application/x-httpd-php .php" aswell
> as /etc/apac
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be
> reproduced, but it's not a bug, or at least not our fault"?
> (Bugzilla calls this "INVALID").
>
> Often, but not always, the bug can or should be reassigned to another
> package,
>
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 331 (new: 11)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 87 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
24 matches
Mail list logo
