http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer defines the following tags as reasons to dismiss a bug report:
* wontfix: the behaviour described can be reproduced or the feature request is understood; it is indeed an issue with our package but we can't or won't do anything about it because there are stronger reasons to leave things the way they are. * unreproducible: the behaviour described could not be reproduced or the feature requested already exists. But what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be reproduced, but it's not a bug, or at least not our fault"? (Bugzilla calls this "INVALID"). Often, but not always, the bug can or should be reassigned to another package, but then a second user might come around and submit the same bug report. Example: http://bugs.debian.org/400437 and http://bugs.debian.org/400693 -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpufrZsDze9G.pgp
Description: PGP signature