> Please hold off on filing them for a few days, so I can add
> usertag-on-submit support to debbugs, so that it should be possible to
^^
*that* will be a great feature..:)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello d-dev,
>
> I noticed yesterday that after an upgrade I got a /usr/lib64 dir
> with some (not neded) stuff in it. I am not running any 64 bit arch.
>
> $ dpkg -S /usr/lib64 # says:
> libg2c0-dev, fakeroot, libgfortran1-dev: /usr/lib64
>
> I ha
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:10:20PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Javier,
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:05:58AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure if anybody else is seeing this but I have seen (just today) 28
> > spam messages sent to the BTS. I've received them be
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Please hold off on filing them for a few days, so I can add
> > usertag-on-submit support to debbugs, so that it should be possible to
> ^^
>
> *that* will be a great feature..:)
This should "in theory" be working now.
Usert
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061021 09:54]:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Please hold off on filing them for a few days, so I can add
> > > usertag-on-submit support to debbugs, so that it should be possible to
> > ^^
> >
> > *that* will be a g
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061021 09:54]:
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > > Please hold off on filing them for a few days, so I can add
> > > > usertag-on-submit support to debbugs, so that it should be possible to
> > >
On 9/26/06, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi everybody
I just now notice the debate on mplayer going on;
so here are a few answers
[snip: mplayer is okay to go in]
I don't know if this is answered elswhere, but how come it is still
stuck in NEW?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> I ask because he took (or was going to anyway) maintainership of the
> package blam, but this was about a month ago and no new version has
> been uploaded.
I am not so sure, he doesn't look like he intends to adopt blam:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Question is - does Debian i386 currently support running on 64-bit binaries
if hardware supports it?
Just checked:
$ apt-get install libc6-dev-amd64
...
$ gcc -m64 -o hello hello.c
$ ./hello
bash: ./hello: cannot execute binary file
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
...
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Why don't we all try to calm down and get less paranoid?
I hope there are big Finnish saunas in Edinburgh.
I think we all need to gather for a hot sauna next DebConf.
We should change this "you can't flame people you have had sauna with"
to "you can't flame me until you've h
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Please hold off on filing them for a few days, so I can add
> usertag-on-submit support to debbugs, so that it should be possible to
> automatically track this stuff, and easily avoid filing duplicate bugs
> if they're not fixed the next time bugs get filed.
Thanks, AJ. That
Am Samstag 21 Oktober 2006 11:49 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> Question is - does Debian i386 currently support running on 64-bit binaries
> if hardware supports it?
_and_ if the kernel supports it.
> Linux blacky 2.6.18-1-k7 #1 SMP Fri Sep 29 17:06:47 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
-k7 is for Athlo
[Don Armstrong]
> Well, once I wake up a bit, you'll be able to go:
>
> Package: foopkg
> User: username
> Usertags: fooblehtag,bartag
>
> [But it won't work for setting multiple users... to do that, you'll
> have to use control.]
This is even better. Is there a web page documenting this new
fea
[Tshepang Lekhonkhobe]
> I don't know if this is answered elswhere, but how come it is still
> stuck in NEW?
The speed of NEW processing have slowed down significantly this
autumn. There used to be enough people working on it, but at the
moment there are too few doing it. This summer, it was do
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xenman
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Haphazard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yves
Perrenoud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xenman.sourceforge.net/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-urljr
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : JanRain, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/libraries/python/
* License : LGPL
Programm
Hello, Debian world!
This is a status update for the Debian GNU/FreeBSD port[1].
Compared to previous status mail [2], this port now consists
of two architectures: kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64.
Currently we focus mainly on kfreebsd-i386.
Status
--
* We have uptodate toolchain and most
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-openid
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : JanRain, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/libraries/python/
* License : LGPL
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-yadis
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : JanRain, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
tags 360920 patch
thanks
Hi,
I found out that the tix-dev does not install the essential tix.h. This
is extremly inconvenient, if you need tix. There is a bugreport about this that
is
almost 200 days old, without a response by the maintainer.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3
I forgot to mention the NMU in the changelog explicitely. I uploaded another
package with a complete changelog entry.
Cheers,
Michael
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 09:16:50PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> tags 360920 patch
>
> thanks
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I found out that the tix-dev does not install th
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:16:52 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yeah. And if you get a lot of spam to the list, using the listadmin
>script make it a lot easier to process through the moderation
>requests. One of the list I moderate get 200 spam a day, and I would
>never have
I demand that Hendrik Sattler may or may not have written...
[snip]
> 64bit kernels are not available in the i386 archive. That makes the 64bit
> libs rather useless, doesn't it?
No - you could be using a locally-built 64-bit kernel.
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashin
> Am Samstag 21 Oktober 2006 11:49 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
>> Question is - does Debian i386 currently support running on 64-bit
>> binaries if hardware supports it?
>
> _and_ if the kernel supports it.
>
>> Linux blacky 2.6.18-1-k7 #1 SMP Fri Sep 29 17:06:47 UTC 2006 i686
>> GNU/Linux
>
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:18:41 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:37:36PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > That's not correct. [serious, grave, and critical] are the
>> > "release critical" severities, though some release critical
>> > issues won't be fi
On Sat October 21 2006 13:35, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Hendrik Sattler may or may not have written...
> > 64bit kernels are not available in the i386 archive. That makes the
> > 64bit libs rather useless, doesn't it?
>
> No - you could be using a locally-built 64-bit kernel.
Perhaps i386
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Don Armstrong]
> > Well, once I wake up a bit, you'll be able to go:
> >
> > Package: foopkg
> > User: username
> > Usertags: fooblehtag,bartag
> >
> > [But it won't work for setting multiple users... to do that, you'll
> > have to use control.]
>
Package: wnpp
Owner: Axel Beckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: conkeror
Version : 0.34
Upstream Author : Shawn Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://conkeror.mozdev.org/
* License : MPL or OSI-approved[1]
Programming Lang: JavaScri
Am Samstag 21 Oktober 2006 23:44 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> * Package name : conkeror
Is the misleading name (sounds too much like "konqueror") chosen
intentionally?
HS
pgpQfxNBEMKqF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday, 21 October 2006 23:44, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Axel Beckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: conkeror
I would really like if you choose a less misleading name, like
mozilla-firefox-conkeror , just like the webdeveloper extension is
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:54:10AM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > * Package name: conkeror
>
> I would really like if you choose a less misleading name, like
> mozilla-firefox-conkeror , just like the webdeveloper extension is
> named.
Yeah, I already wondered about the really misleadi
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Gee. Don't we already have something very like this?
> These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug severities
> _serious_ (for _must_ or _required_ directive violations), _minor_,
> _normal_ or
Greetings, and thank you all so much for your usual fantastic work on
Debian!
I just wanted to make a few observations about the recent decision to
scrap m68k from etch:
1) The 4.x C compiler and hppa and apparently arm are currently much
worse.
2) kernel and/or libc bugs preventing any prof
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hoz
Version : 1.65
Upstream Author : Gustavo Picon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hoz.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : file spl
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:28:54 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:40:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Gee. Don't we already have something very like this?
>> These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug severities
>> _serious_ (for _must_ or _required_ direc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremias Casteglione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: autoplayiso
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : Rafael Ignacio Zurita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://amidamaru.homelinux.org/debian/debs/
License : GPL
Descrip
(Yes, I'm on vacation, and really am still on vacation, but I had a brief
check-in moment and happened to see this thread. Note that I probably
won't see responses, unless I get to them tomorrow night, until the
beginning of November.)
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just run
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cl-chunga
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Dr. Edmund Weitz
* URL : http://weitz.de/chunga/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Common Lisp
Description : Portable
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:18:45PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sat October 21 2006 13:35, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Hendrik Sattler may or may not have written...
> > > 64bit kernels are not available in the i386 archive. That makes the
> > > 64bit libs rather useless, doesn't it?
> >
39 matches
Mail list logo
