Hi, On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:54:10AM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > > * Package name : conkeror > > I would really like if you choose a less misleading name, like > mozilla-firefox-conkeror , just like the webdeveloper extension is > named.
Yeah, I already wondered about the really misleading name. But I just hadn't a better idea for a package name and so have chosen the straight one. But you're right, I should better name it "firefox-conkeror" (since all the mozilla-firefox-* packages seemed to have been renamed to firefox-*). > It's quite nice to see that while the Mozilla foundation are really > picky about their names, they don't seem to care at all about other > app (even open source ones) names. .oO( Phoenix, Firebird, ... ) Well, yes, you're right about the Mozilla Foundation. But Conkeror is no Mozilla Foundation project, it's just a Firefox extenstion with a strange name and hosted at some site, which also seems to have no affiliation with the Mozilla Foundation. It's rather it's own foundation, see http://www.mozdev.org/about.html as we http://www.mozdev.org/faq.html#mozilla. Regards, Axel -- Axel Beckert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://abe.home.pages.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]