Le lun 26 juin 2006 21:53, Petr Vandrovec a écrit :
> Maybe it could be default for tar's POSIX mode, but I have no idea
> why GNU mode behavior should be changed in any way.
I second that. it's now completely unpossible to do basic packaging
work, because such a change wasn't planned. I also don
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just built new xml-security-c packages to fix the current FTBFS bug, and
> lintian returned the following error message:
>
> E: libxml-security-c-doc: deb-created-with-broken-tar file:
> /usr/share/doc/libxml-security-c-doc/c/apiDocs/winutils_2XSECBinH
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 11:07, Roger Leigh wrote:
--cut--
> > (along with several other files). These filenames are indeed exactly 100
> > characters long, as mentioned in the referenced bug. The bug, however,
> > indicates that this may not have really been a bug in tar but rather was
> > a bug
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 11:42:40AM +0200, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> Great that you've put this up to public. Still, for this to be
> accepted, we need to come up with patches for apt that contain an
> algorithm that will pick versions of packages matching user's
> requirements, known architecture
also sprach alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.27.0648 +0200]:
> PGStorage is a ZODB backend that persists to a PostgreSQL database.
> PGStorage stores simple pickles in the database, so it is compatible
> with most Zope applications and is much simpler than Ape. Undo and
> packing ar
How have you been, nancy preussner
Reef!ll f or nancy preussner is ready.
Please re-confirm your Data.
http://geocities.com/sloan3648
Your order info as per our records: nancy preussner
your info if wrong, please help us to correct it
Just check the site above to make sure all right.
Best
Volker,
As I've already indicated at some point, fixing dpkg-architecture
is a trivial task: just add your stuff to cputable or ostable be off with it.
(I used to do that for some embedded architectures, look for example
at http://www.xs4all.nl/~kurzanov/debian/patches/dpkg-1.13.16-all-1.patch).
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:17:20AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Wait, there is less than 70MB of PDF. Yes, this is true. Due to
>> > difficulties of making nice PDF out of XML/SGML without hitting FTBFS,
>> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libgd-securityimage-perl
Version : 1.61
Upstream Author : Burak Gursoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/GD/GD-SecurityI
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 09:07:03AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just built new xml-security-c packages to fix the current FTBFS bug, and
> > lintian returned the following error message:
> >
> > E: libxml-security-c-doc: deb-created-with-broken-tar f
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:02 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le lun 26 juin 2006 21:53, Petr Vandrovec a écrit :
> > Maybe it could be default for tar's POSIX mode, but I have no idea
> > why GNU mode behavior should be changed in any way.
>
> I second that. it's now completely unpossible to do bas
Le mar 27 juin 2006 13:37, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:02 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le lun 26 juin 2006 21:53, Petr Vandrovec a écrit :
> > > Maybe it could be default for tar's POSIX mode, but I have no
> > > idea why GNU mode behavior should be changed in any way.
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:02 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Le lun 26 juin 2006 21:53, Petr Vandrovec a écrit :
>>> Maybe it could be default for tar's POSIX mode, but I have no idea
>>> why GNU mode behavior should be changed in any way.
>> I second that. it's now complet
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:35:19 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. There is snd-pcm-oss.ko, which provides working OSS sound, even if
> you don't use aoss. Just make sure to load the proper module.
This won't provide working sound in case you're using dmix or something
similar (o
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 13:00 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> It's not so much packages already in the archive, it's every package
> that is being prepared to be uploaded.
>
> Lintian *always* fails for all packages that I build on a system with
> the updated tar. None of those packages failed prior t
On 6/23/06, Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose to add more CPU types to dpkg-architecture. In particular,
I'd like to see the different i386 architectures there, i.e.
i586, i686, k6, ...
Compiling everything for fifteen flavors of x86 doen't make any sense
at all except for it t
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:37:21 +0200
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:02 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le lun 26 juin 2006 21:53, Petr Vandrovec a écrit :
> > > Maybe it could be default for tar's POSIX mode, but I have no idea
> > > why GNU mode behavior sho
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 15:31 +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> It is also bound to break numerous private scripts on peoples systems.
> And for no good reason, the default has been like this for years now,
> why change that? For the POSIX-pedantic people there is always the POSIX
> mode.
In that case ju
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> cjk is still a problem, that's right. I hope I'll be able to sponsor an
>> upload of latex-cjk soon.
>
> Please. I did few minor NMU to get it to etch. I thought Anthony Fok
> is back in action.
Yes, he is, but Danai Sae-Han is taking over the package.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:28:15PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:17:20AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Wait, there is less than 70MB of PDF. Yes, this is true. Due to
> >> >
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 17:07, Frank Küster wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know current effort of moving developer-reference to XML is only
> > for HTML and plain text. There seem to be issues with building PDF
> > from UTF-8. Talk to W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on this
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:08:57PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:35:19 +0200
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No. There is snd-pcm-oss.ko, which provides working OSS sound, even if
> > you don't use aoss. Just make sure to load the proper module.
>
> This w
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fear there will be a lot. for me lintian failed, and I had some
> curious behaviour with one package I sponsored recently. To avoid
> problems atm, I force my pbuilder to use the tar from testing.
A fixed version of lintian will be uploaded today.
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Look into the source package and run "make ifupdown.pdf" (yep you need few
>> more dependancy application installed like "dia". )
>
> Thanks, I'll check that.
There's no LaTeX- or PDF-specific reason not to build the
documentation. It builds without cha
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 June 2006 17:07, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I know current effort of moving developer-reference to XML is only
>> > for HTML and plain text. There seem to be issues with building PDF
>> > from UTF-8. Talk
for information relating to acne please see http://www.acne.informationsites.tv>http://www.acne.informationsites.tv
http://bramshaw.net/emailscript//box.php?funcml=unsub2&nl=1&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To Unsubscribe, please click here:
/box.php?funcml=unsub2&nl=1&[
Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Look into the source package and run "make ifupdown.pdf" (yep you need few
>>> more dependancy application installed like "dia". )
>> Thanks, I'll check that.
>
> There's no LaTeX- or PDF-specific reason not to build the
> docume
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 20:06, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 17:07, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > I know current effort of moving developer-reference to XML is only
> >> > for HTML and plain text. Ther
cyrus-sasl2 is an important package, and according to p.q.d.o, it's
been nearly two years since Dima Barsky last made a release. In the
intervening time there have been numerous NMUs, but no one has claimed
ownership, and it currently has 5 RC bugs, 39 important/normal ones,
etc.
I other words, t
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>
> Since this seems to have been an intentional behavior change by
> upstream to better align with a published standard, I'm uninclined to
> fight it, and think our best response is to update our utilities to
> include the --wildcards
On (27/06/06 15:51), Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> cyrus-sasl2 is an important package, and according to p.q.d.o, it's
> been nearly two years since Dima Barsky last made a release. In the
> intervening time there have been numerous NMUs, but no one has claimed
> ownership, and it currently has 5 R
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:21:13PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >For instance, some programs with lots of calculations (e.g. mplayer)
> >are compiled with different processor optimizations (e.g. mplayer-i586).
> >Such packages are create
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This has come up a couple of times recently. If you want to help out
> you should subscribe to that mailing list, and get yourself added to
> the alioth project and then coordinate your work with them.
Thanks for the pointer. I don't see them making a re
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm one of the small minority of people who have a very negative
> opinion about gmail. I realise I'm a bit of a kook on this subject
> and I'd ideally I'd like to avoid having an enormous flamewar about
> it.
>
> However, it has come to my attention that a
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working
> anymore. Sound that is. One *may* use aoss, but then the user needs to
> open a terminal and write:
>
> aoss program-name
>
> because launching from the menu it won
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:55 -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working
> > anymore. Sound that is. One *may* use aoss, but then the user needs to
> > open a terminal and write:
>
Scripsit Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If package maintainer wants to build it faster on their own machine, I
> would imagine that checking for an environment variable (DEB_MAKE_OPTS
> or something, perhaps?) and using that would be the way to go. By
> default, build with a single processor
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, in fact also design a mechanism to share knowledge about which
> source packages may break if given a -j due to insufficiently
> specified dependencies. So perhaps using $(DEB_MAKE_J_OPTION) on the
> "$(MAKE) all" line in debian/rules is a better c
* Alexander Sack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:25:36PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Martin Spoehrle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:34:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > Please test these packages! There was quite a lot of code change i
> Debian still has to provide an upgrade path for users upgrading from Sarge.
> We cannot blindly break users scripts.
Here, the only way seems to be putting an entry in NEWS.Debian (for
users script, ie things not under our control).
> We did something similar with "su" but we did it earlier in
Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:21:13PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> On 6/23/06, Volker Grabsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For instance, some programs with lots of calculations (e.g. mplayer)
>>> are compiled with different processor optimizations (e.g. mplayer-i58
41 matches
Mail list logo
