* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
> > I wasn't making any claim as to the general validity of IDs which
> > are purchased and I'm rather annoyed that you attempted to
> > extrapolate it out to such. What I said is that he wasn't trying to
>
I have seen on the internet that someone wanted to port debian to minix3, but
the report was old. Is there anyone that wants to port? I find it usefull.
I don't have the ability to do it, but if it works I will switch to it [ the
next versionof minix will handle driver crashes(no more nasty fs c
On May 25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Debian, up until the removal of on-boot depmod, you did NOT have to run
> depmod. This is a fact, plain and simple. The fact that this does not hold
Only if you rebooted after manually installing modules, which I think
everyb
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 09:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted kchmviewer 2.0-1 (source i386)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello!
/me playing the devil's advocate instead of Enrico...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:32:43 +0200, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> As an additional bit of security, I asked some people to show their
> visa, issued by the Mexican government, or check the Mexican seal
> they got on their point of entranc
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 19:18 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> However, it has come to my attention that at least one developer
> appears to be reading debian-private at their gmail account.
And at least hundreds of people appear to be reading debian-private on
slashdot news.
--
.''`.
Le jeudi 25 mai 2006 à 02:36 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> signing party recently.
FWIW, I'm pretty sure Martin presented me an official German ID card.
But
My memory is horrible, but IIRC James Troup (ie, our keymaster..) did
some similar study at the DebConf5 KSP and ended up with a list of
people whose GPG signtures he didn't trust anymore because of whatever
trick they fell for.
This thread seems entirely blown out of porportion.
--
see shy jo
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 16:01 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
> Thanks for all replies.
In a private email you sent me, you said you were going to stop posting
on Debian mailing lists. This was just another lie.
Furthermore this email was full of allegations and insults while you
perfectly knew y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kevin B. McCarty writes ("Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail"):
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> distributed to computers whose owners and operators cannot be expected
>>> to refrain from processing the content in othe
Enrico Zini wrote:
However, from the book you don't get the address of madduck's home,
which is what you want when you have to go and drag him to jail if he
willingly uploads some malicious code.
None of my ID documents tell you my address either. Is there any reason
why they should?
This
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% grep-dctrl -F Priority required
> /var/lib/apt/lists/storage_debian-amd64_dists_stable_main_binary-amd64_Packages
> -s Section | sort | uniq -c
> 1 Section: admin
> 36 Section: base
> 1 Section: devel
> 12 Section: libs
>
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:08:31PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> He didn't try to dupe people and this claim is getting rather old.
> Duping people would have actually been putting false information on the
> ID and generating a fake key and trying to get someone to sign off on
> the fake key based
On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
>> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
>
> Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
> Martin's key aft
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Enrico Zini wrote:
> This prompts me that we should probably be taking trusted notes of birth
> dates and birth places, because it's hard to physically trace one person
> down just given his or her name.
At this point, it would be best to have all DDs actually enter into legal
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:12:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
> >>> pffft. This is taking it to an extreme. He wasn't trying to fake
> >>> who he was, it just wasn't an ID issued by a generally recognized
> >>> government (or perhaps not a govern
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:12:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> He has already bragged about how he cracked the KSP by
> presenting an unofficial ID which he bought -- an action designed to
> show the weakness of signing parties. So, this was a bad faith act,
> since the action was
#include
* Margarita Manterola [Wed, May 24 2006, 11:56:05PM]:
> >What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
> >only needs to walk trough the directories and stat the files without
> >reading them.
>
> This is what's being done currently, as far as I know, and it takes
Hello Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>>> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
>>> script?
>>
>> Please go ahead. Anything rely
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjung-java
Version : 1.7.4
Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 10:17]:
> My memory is horrible, but IIRC James Troup (ie, our keymaster..) did
> some similar study at the DebConf5 KSP and ended up with a list of
> people whose GPG signtures he didn't trust anymore because of whatever
> trick they fell for.
I know that P
On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:16:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The KSP was cracked, People signed a key without ever looking
> > at proper, official ID. You can try and save face by calling it
> > whatever yo
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> signing party recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
> point that large KSP's are events where it is
James Troup wrote:
> My key was part of the DC4 KSP materials, but I didn't manage to
> attend in the end. A couple of people signed my key despite my lack
> of attendance and one of them an NM applicant, IIRC. Again from
> memory, Martin talked to the NM in question who was very apologetic,
> cl
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> signing party recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
> point that large KSP's are events where it is hard to reas
On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
>> script?
>
> Please go ahead. Anything relying on it
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
>
> > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
> >> of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
> >> often leads to others.
> >
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:07:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Say you have a binary package (Multi-Arch: no) firfox and a
> > library/plugin package firefox-mplayer-plugin.
> > This could be handled by firefox having a "Provides:
> >
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
> to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
> and a development package to facilitate linking to their
> library. There are certain hoops we must jump i
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, passports are not really an answer (I have no idea
> what the passport of cameroon looke like, for example). Given time,
> one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least two
> photo ID's issued by the government)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:42:07AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[snip]
> People write books in the name of someone else fairly often, actually.
>
> No, I'm not only thinking about the Bible :)
>
> There's professional book writers w
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 285 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 77 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requeste
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
> script?
I guess it would be a time-saver to remove the depmod call.
However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Maybe we should just drop holding KSPs, and fall back to the
> traditional method of "Hey, nice dinner we had yesterday. Say, now
> that you know me, my family and my history, would you like to sign my
> key as well?" - Signing for people you actually know, not just linking
> f
* Manoj Srivastava:
> I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of
> what I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other
> people who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I
> find that my decision to vaive my personal requirements of two
On May 25, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about having module-init-tools run depmod when needed and have all
> other packages rely on that? That way it would run at most once.
And how would module-init-tools be supposd to know when it would be
needed to run depmod?
--
ciao
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
and not showing any passports or showing passports:
[...]
- which did not had the *same* spelling as the name in the key (letter by
letter)
will not get a signature from me.
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keys
yo
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
>
>> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
>>> of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
>>> often leads
#include
* Marco d'Itri [Thu, May 25 2006, 09:36:11AM]:
> On May 24, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
> We already do.
Eh, typo, should have been "depmod -A". I think this is a sufficiently
time-optimized version
Le Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:29:43PM -0400, Charles Fry a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: libjung-java
> Version : 1.7.4
> Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
> > Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
> > Martin's key after he showed me his passport?
>
> In my opinion, yes, if you consider subverting the KSP like
>
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
>
> > On Thu, 25 May 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >
> >> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> >> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> >
> > Is there any reason to revoke my si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID and sign
my key? If there is none, is there somebody in Singapore, where I might
be able to go? I wouldn't be able to go in Hongkong (because of visa
problems) where I could see ther
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:11:55PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
> Who actually has two forms of government issued picture ID[not counting
> a passport which I never take anywhere unless I really need to since it
> is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
> passport phot
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
>
> > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
> >>> I wasn't making any claim as to the general validity of IDs which
> >>> are purchased
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Franz Pletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pympd
Version : 0.06.1
Upstream Author : pympd Dev Team
* URL : http://http://pympd.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Frontend f
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Who actually has two forms of government issued picture ID[not counting
> a passport which I never take anywhere unless I really need to since it
> is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
> passport photo isn't a very good
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>> >> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools in
On May 26, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, Im asking to have _one_ delay at a defined point instead of X
> packages having a delay because they might have to run depmod manualy.
This is not a choice, every package which installs modules must run
depmod or they will not be ava
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:10:09AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> At Debconf Joey Hess and I have integrated support for the graphical
> installer into the main build system for d-i. For now the support is for
> i386 only, but amd64 [1] and powerpc will follow very soon.
I've integrated the existing
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:06:31AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 26 May 2006, Thiemo Seufer outgrape:
>
> > Keysigning isn't for judging behaviour but for confirming identity.
> > * Michael Meskes:
> >
> >> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
> >> that I certify
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> FWIW, I noted down those keys I would *not* sign and didn't tell the people
> at the KSP that I would not sign them. I guess his experiment "only one in
> ten said that they would *not* sign it" is moot unless he back
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:49:20AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > The maintainer, at some point during a private conversation, even
> > discouraged me to upload to *experimental* a new version of sysklogd
> > fixing the issues I have prepared. That's why they ended up in my
> > p.d.o page (they
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>>
>>> Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
>>> created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
>>> from your system and couldn't upgrade before new
On 26 May 2006, Florian Weimer outgrape:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
>
>> I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of what
>> I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other people
>> who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I find
>> that my decision to
On 25 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow uttered the following:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
>> to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
>> and a development package to facilitate linking
On 5/26/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keysyou sign and not, I have come to the conclusion that the "exact samespelling" requirement doesn't make that much sense. As an example, take
Bdale whose real name isn't Bdale
On 25 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell told this:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an unofficial,
>> and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key signing party
>> recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious point th
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 16:01 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
> > Thanks for all replies.
>
> In a private email you sent me, you said you were going to stop posting
> on Debian mailing lists. This was just another lie.
Hmm, Debi
Martin Schulze wrote:
> However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
> kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Kernels already run depmod when installed, and module packages would
just need to be changed to call depmod with the right parameters to m
Hi,
I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
acceptable behaviour.
I check photographs, name, age, and expiry dates on ID
presented. I did not include document verification in that checklist,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we can find official IDs that look so lame that you'd think
> > it's a fake (the old french ones could be good example, and i know people
> > who still use that
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> >and not showing any passports or showing passports:
>
> [...]
>
> >- which did not had the *same* spelling as the name in the key (letter by
> > letter)
> >
> >will not get a signature
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
> > > Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
> > > Martin's key after he showed me his passport?
> >
On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
> two photo ID's issued by the government).
WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID card.
If you have an ID card, you have to surren
* Michael Meskes:
> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state that I
> certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to belong to?
Exactly. It does not tell us anything about your views regarding that
person or the purpose of the key itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mod-bt
Version : 0.0.16
Upstream Author : Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C, la
On 26 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst told this:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
>> that I certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to
>> belong to?
>
> That aside, personally, I don't kno
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Goirand said:
> Hello!
>
> Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID and sign
> my key? If there is none, is there somebody in Singapore, where I might
> be able to go? I wouldn't be able to go in Hongkong (because of visa
> problems) where I
On May 26, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
> > We already do.
> Eh, typo, should have been "depmod -A". I think this is a sufficiently
> time-optimized version of "depmod -a".
Yes, this is what the script uses.
--
On May 26, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
> kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Are you sure that this is still true? I believe that this has been fixed
a long time ago.
> It should be p
On 26 May 2006, Thiemo Seufer outgrape:
> Keysigning isn't for judging behaviour but for confirming identity.
> * Michael Meskes:
>
>> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
>> that I certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to
>> belong to?
>
> Exactly. It
On Fri, 26 May 2006, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
I have no idea about illegal (it might well be against some international
treaty, however), but it is very dangerous for you not to have your passport
stamped. There are very fe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
[snip]
> [0] As long as he doesn't go and vote too, since the people in the voting
> table
> wou
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What would you suggest instead?
>
> Stop signing keys for Debian developers, since purchased ID's
> are acceptable in this community? ;) At this point, I am not sure what
> my stance is going to be.
What do you think we get by having the s
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 25 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow uttered the following:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
>>> to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
Hello Sir/Madam
Having recieved your email address iam happy to infrom
you that we are one of the embroiders,supplier and exporters of all kinds of
badges for that last 20 years.we have skilled pattern masters ,designers and
very skilled workers.you plz visit www.style-view
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:07:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Only the "dpkg:arch" is required and that can be done with "Provides:
>> dpkg-arch" again.
>
> Right. I wonder if even this should strictly be necessary, though, or if
> dpkg shou
On Friday 26 May 2006 07:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell told this:
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Based on this, I strongly suggest that mere signatures on a new
> >> maintainers key from a DD be also not enough, since people have now
> >> effec
Dear Debian-Developers All Over The World!
may i introduce my,
proposal for a more efficient download process
I. the reason why i suggest a patch-oriented download process
II. a brief description
II.A. on the users
On 26 May 2006, Matt Zagrabelny spake thusly:
> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Cracking is not a scientific study.
>
> cracking may not be, but determining the average number of people
> who spot an unofficial id could be construed to be.
I can honestly stat
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I suppose it would be preferable to fix the "stop" target of the init
>
> There is nothing preferable about it. Stop targets *are* to exit with
> status 0 if the service is already stopped.
Makes sense. In this case,
Luca Capello wrote:
> As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
> leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
> not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at Mexico City
> airport. As 2 others DDs with me (Aurelien Jarno and Matthias K
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 25 May 2006 16:21:35 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Kevin B. McCarty writes ("Re: sending debian-private postings to
> > gmail"):
> >> Ian Jackson wrot
David Moreno Garza dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:47:15PM -0500]:
> > As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
> > leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
> > not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at Mexico City
> > airport. A
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:47:15PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
> while leaving your country but it is supposed to be mandatory to get the
> seal in the country you are arriving, otherwise you could be thought
> you are an
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Penny Leach wrote:
> struck me as a little bit silly. Penny is clearly short for Penelope.
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language and
usual english names and nicknames.
> Perhaps this was my bad when I made the key & displayed a lack of foresight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:34:50AM -0500]:
> > know who Martin Krafft is; I've seen him at a number of FOSDEM
> > instances, and I've seen him last year in Helsinki, where I called
> > him by his name (to which he reacted), and where literally hundreds
> > of others did the sam
On 5/27/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language andusual english names and nicknames.This is true. One of the people at Debconf 5 I was thinking of, whose name I absolutely have no idea of anymore, was either a n
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 19:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted openbabel 2.0.1-1 (source i386)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at
>> least two photo ID's issued by the government).
> WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID
> c
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived a
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 07:15:53AM +1200, Penny Leach wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keys
> >you sign and not, I have come to the conclusion that the "exact same
> >spelling" requirement doesn't ma
Your message dated Sat, 08 Apr 2006 06:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted tcm 2.20+TSQD-3 (source i386 all)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Penny Leach wrote:
>Penny is clearly short for Penelope.
No, it is not _clear_. I don't have to know what are the short names
for almost any name around. I'm also confused with names in German
(correct me if wrong, please) containing, for example 'ö' and being
displayed as 'oe', or some of the
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
> > two photo ID's issued by the government).
>
> WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I disagree with this; Debian has no need to know my birthdate or -place
> and I don't see a reason to stuff that kind of information into a database.
I agree with this. Although checking for date of birth while checking
your GPG key is a very nice thing I learned from som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:06:40 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require
> > at least two photo ID's issued by the govern
I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Actually, passports are not really an answer (I have no idea what the
>> passport of cameroon looke like, for example). Given time, one can pay
>> more attention to each document (I
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Not always.
>
> In Mexico, upon reentry, my passport is sometimes stamped, but usually
> not.
You _usually_ don't get your passport stamped? Really? In recent flights?
I have never entered Mexico back without the Immigration seal.
> Within the Schengen area (European Union
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
