On May 26, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it > > We already do. > Eh, typo, should have been "depmod -A". I think this is a sufficiently > time-optimized version of "depmod -a". Yes, this is what the script uses.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
