On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:32:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Seems to me that this should be at least a bug report on alsa-utils.
> > I'm surprised that there would be a need for a lintian check for it, but
> > I guess it's better than letting such
On Apr 30, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
Yes, it's very annoying that a dependency on another scripting language
was added because of a trivial script.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 06-Apr-29 20:51, Frans Pop wrote:
> tags 365203 - pending
> tags 365203 + wontfix
> tags 365345 + wontfix
> tags 339716 + wontfix
> tags 354947 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> I'm very sorry, but after discussing this during the d-i development
> meeting and consulting with Release Management, we feel
Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: haxe
> Version : 0.b5
> Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse
> * URL or Web page : http://haxe.org
> * License : GPL
> Description : Web programming languge generating
On 4/29/06, Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
all replies tries to tell me that I'm intend to crack the GPG. Believe
me, If I could do it, I would not use it anymore since it's not safe
enough.
Err, the password is not an unchangable part of the key. You are in
the perfect condition to att
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:38:43AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > almost unusable ; including 'emacs-snapshot-gtk' 'display' 'xmms'
> > ('xmms' is missing fonts for the menus but not for the main display);
Not sure if this is related but for display see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Hello,
This is the last call for keys for the debconf6 keysigning party
in Oaxtepec.
This coming Saturday is the last date to send your key(s).
If you intend to participate in the debconf6 keysigning party in
Oaxtepec, please send your ascii armored public key as explained at
[0] or, alternative
gustavo halperin dijo [Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:46:09PM +0300]:
> I don't understand your question: "why would you want to use XFree now?",
>what do you mean.
>Do you mean why not use X.org ??.
>Any way the current XFree version in Debian stable is 4.3, this version is
>to old fo
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:03:19AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> There is no xorg 7.0 backport yet, and I fear it will not be easy to
> add one (as the Debian xorg 7.0 introduced _major_ packaging changes,
> if somebody puts up a backport it will probably be completely made
> from scratch to behave a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xchat-guile
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Zeeshan Ali Khattak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://piipiip.net/~zeenix/xchat-guile/
* License : GPLv2 or later
Progra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: probcons
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Chuong B. Do <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://probcons.stanford.edu/download.html
License : Public Domain
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xfce4-messenger-plugin
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Pasi Orovuo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Yves-Alexis Perez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xfce4-screenshooter-plugin
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Daniel Bobadilla Leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de
* License : GPL
Progr
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve McIntyre]
>
>> I can see that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on
>> oftc, to the extent that I'm (currently) not on any freenode
>> channels at all.
>>
>
> For me it is the other way around. I am currently on one channel on
> OFTC, whi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Adriano Winter Bess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de
* License : GPL
Programm
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
>> [Steve McIntyre]
>>
>>
>>> I can see that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions are on
>>> oftc, to the extent that I'm (currently) not on any freenode
>>> channels at all.
>>>
>>>
>> For me it is the other
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:32:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to me that this should be at least a bug report on alsa-utils.
> I'm surprised that there would be a
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
a bug.
alsa-utils should de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> How about using fontconfig ? Even without using the API you can use it
> to look for a font:
> $ fc-match --verbose sans | awk '$1=="file:"'
> file: "/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/D/DejaVu-Sans.ttf"(s)
Is there a way t
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 04:25:18PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> "Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:32:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >>Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> Seems to me that this should be at lea
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, that's not what I said. The python-minimal package is designed to be
> used *as* an Essential package, not *by* Essential packages. Nothing,
> essential or not, should depend on it in Debian, whether or not
> python-minimal itself gets marked as Ess
Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm playing paranoid here, but why don't you want to declare
> dependencies on essential packages?
The short answer is "because Policy 3.5 says they shouldn't." I'm not
positive about the exact rationale, though.
> If the package ceases to be Essent
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vdrift
Version : 2006.02.21
Upstream Author : Joe Venzon
* URL : http://www.vdrift.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : An open source d
Hello all -
Regarding the ideas discussed here:
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/rsync-and-debian.html
Has anyone ever done some log file analysis to figure out how much
bandwidth would be saved by transferring package deltas instead of
entire new packages?
Assuming someone hasn't done
Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/rsync-and-debian.html
>
> Has anyone ever done some log file analysis to figure out how much
> bandwidth would be saved by transferring package deltas instead of
> entire new packages?
Slightly off-topic, but
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 02:08:25PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, that's not what I said. The python-minimal package is designed to be
> > used *as* an Essential package, not *by* Essential packages. Nothing,
> > essential or not, should depend o
Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/rsync-and-debian.html
>>
>> Has anyone ever done some log file analysis to figure out how much
>> bandwidth would be saved by transferring package deltas instead of
>> e
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bittorrent has a per chunk hash so it can validate each chunk when it
> recieves it instead of waiting for the full file. It won't see if a
> chunk is present at some other position in the file, not even if that
> position is also on chunk boundarie
28 matches
Mail list logo
