Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 05 avril 2006 à 15:18 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit : > Attached is the first in the series of dpkg patches which adds > solaris-i386 architecture support used by NexentaOS. Have you fixed the legal situation of dpkg being linked with a GPL-incompatible C library? Regards, -- .''`.

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Donnellan
The GPL states that you can freely link with libraries normally shipped with your OS or compiler, so I would think this would include the C library. andrew On 4/6/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 05 avril 2006 à 15:18 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit : > > Attached is the

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:41:04PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > The GPL states that you can freely link with libraries normally > shipped with your OS or compiler, No. It says you may do this *if* you aren't shipping your GPLed binaries together with those libraries. -- Steve Langasek

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Donnellan
Hmmm. Would this include 'mere aggregation'? On 4/6/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:41:04PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > The GPL states that you can freely link with libraries normally > > shipped with your OS or compiler, > > No. It says you may d

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:41:04PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > The GPL states that you can freely link with libraries normally > shipped with your OS or compiler, so I would think this would include > the C library. Unfortunately, it does not apply if the thing you ship is also part of that s

Bug#361098: ITP: libdata-structure-util-perl -- Change nature of data within a structure

2006-04-06 Thread Jonathan McDowell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdata-structure-util-perl Version : 0.11 Upstream Author : Pierre Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~pdenis/Data-Structure-Util/ * License : Pe

process timeslice

2006-04-06 Thread Robbie
Hi All, I'm trying to determine if their is an API that allows the user program to change the scheduler timeslice. Is there any? If not Is their any recommendations for changine it in the kernel? ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most perso

MIA: Thomas Fasth? (was: Re: About the maintainance of monotone)

2006-04-06 Thread Adrian von Bidder
QA/MIA people: are you reading this (below)? Or Thomas - perhaps you have time to dropa a quick note yourself? cheers -- vbi On Tuesday 04 April 2006 23:46, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if there's a way to figure out what the status of the > monotone package is. T

Re: MIA: Thomas Fasth?

2006-04-06 Thread Frank Küster
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > QA/MIA people: are you reading this (below)? Or Thomas - perhaps you have > time to dropa a quick note yourself? http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa If you want to reach the QA/MIA people, try [EMAIL P

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 4/6/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No. It says you may do this *if* you aren't shipping your GPLed >> binaries together with those libraries. > Hmmm. Would this include 'mere aggregation'? Yes. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECT

Re: process timeslice

2006-04-06 Thread Simon Richter
Hello, Robbie schrieb: I'm trying to determine if their is an API that allows the user program to change the scheduler timeslice. Is there any? Changing the slices doesn't make much of a difference -- I'd just give the process with special needs some realtime privilege. Simon -- To U

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Donnellan
The language in the GPL seems quite ambiguous; it could be argued that this is really a violation of DFSG#9 (license must not contaminate) (I wouldn't say it is), but it is ambiguous. andrew On 4/7/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 4

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The language in the GPL seems quite ambiguous; The language in the GPL is not ambiguous and the meaning of this section has been well-understood and widely discussed for years. | The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for |

Bug#361134: ITP: qvamps -- Qt based frontend for vamps

2006-04-06 Thread Moratti Claudio
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Moratti Claudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: qvamps Version : 0.96 Upstream Author : Vamps Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://vamps.sf.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: C, Perl Description : Qt ba

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Donnellan
(d-l may give advice) So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU utils would be easier as there is _usually_ only one copyright holder: FSF) or OpenSolaris needs to relicense (impossible as Sun woul

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Donnellan
Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc. andrew On 4/7/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (d-l may give advice) > > So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from > *every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. > (the GNU utils would be e

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Alex Ross
Andrew Donnellan wrote: (d-l may give advice) So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU utils would be easier as there is _usually_ only one copyright holder: FSF) or OpenSolaris needs to rel

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote: > Andrew Donnellan wrote: > >(d-l may give advice) > >So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every* > >copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU > >utils would be easier as there is

Bug#361155: ITP: sgf2dg -- Creates TeX files from Go game records

2006-04-06 Thread Vincent Danjean
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: sgf2dg Version : 4.026 Upstream Author : Daniel Bump and Reid Augustin * URL : http://match.stanford.edu/bump/sgf2tex.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: Perl, TeX (

Bug#361159: ITP: libpdf-create-perl -- create PDF files

2006-04-06 Thread Vincent Danjean
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libpdf-create-perl Version : 0.06.1b Upstream Author : Fabien Tassin and Michael Gross * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/perl-pdf/ * License : "This module may be u

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture

2006-04-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote: >> GPLv3 is available at [1]. The draft removes ambiguities of GPLv2, and >> in particular, clarifies the old GPLv2 clause 3: "You may copy and >> distribute the Program ..." During the discussi

Bug#361158: ITP: libpostscript-file-perl -- Base class for creating Adobe PostScript files

2006-04-06 Thread Vincent Danjean
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libpostscript-file-perl Version : 1.01 Upstream Author : Christopher P Willmot * URL : http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/C/CP/CPWILLMOT/ * License : same as Perl (ie GPL or