The language in the GPL seems quite ambiguous; it could be argued that this is really a violation of DFSG#9 (license must not contaminate) (I wouldn't say it is), but it is ambiguous.
andrew On 4/7/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 4/6/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> No. It says you may do this *if* you aren't shipping your GPLed > >> binaries together with those libraries. > > > Hmmm. Would this include 'mere aggregation'? > > Yes. > > -- > Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Andrew Donnellan http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------- Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au Debian user - http://debian.org Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484 OpenNIC user - http://www.opennic.unrated.net
