Re: Delayed ldconfig execution in postinst step

Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 10:56:14PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: >> #include >> * Eduard Bloch [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 10:52:53PM]: >> > #include >> > * Bill Allombert [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 02:56:27PM]: >> > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 01:56:13PM +0100, Eduard Blo

Re: automatically install -dev packages

Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 20-Mar-06, 14:37 (CST), David Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there a setting somewhere I can set to cause apt-get and aptitude to >> always install corresponding -dev packages? The default behavior of not >> installing them is particula

won't distribute this...

closes: #356837 Hi all, I intent *not* to package nino. The reasons: 1. The upstream author never answered my emails 2. The package will install .class and .exe binaries on the (Windows-) client, for which it doesn't provide any sources - that is IMHO not very GPL-compliant. So even if it's only

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation toprovide them fall

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:43, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So a mere non-reply does not, it seems to me, connote anything bad; it > may simply mean that the bug report is complete in itself, and well > get attention when I decide I have the attention

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation toprovide them fall

"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By not answering there's no way for the submitter to know which of the above > applies, it's an issue of not leaving users in uncertainty about what is > going on. > > A simple 1 line reply is enough to remove that uncertainty: > - this t

Re: for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

On 3/22/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:42:49AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems > > to be broken with the output like: > > (...) > > *** glibc detected *** free(): invali

unsubscribe

ATA_PIIX and initrd

Hi guys! I don't know if you are working on the ata_piix bug that prevents me from using the IDE CDROM with the ATA HD... but it's making me going crazy! :) I've following the recommendations of making a new initrd file with the modules ide-generic ata_piix sd_mod and ordered in this way. Now, dur

Re: for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:29:01AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > FYI, GMemChunk (old and deprecated by the upstream) was reimplemented to > use GSlice, so no need to change or rebuild code to be affected due to buggy > code. I don't know exactly why asking GSlice to force allocate and free memory

which packages are older/missing?

Hi, I have two package lists, and want to find out which packages are missing in one of the lists or are older than in the other list. Of course, it's easy to write such a program but if somebody has already done that, I'd try to safe the effort. Any hints for me? (or as alternative, what's the b

Re: ATA_PIIX and initrd

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 03:01:29PM +0100, Jose Luis Ayala wrote: > Hi guys! I don't know if you are working on the ata_piix bug that > prevents me from using the IDE CDROM with the ATA HD... but it's making > me > going crazy! :) > > I've following the recommendations of making a new initrd file w

libopenobex library transition

Hi, Sadly, they changed the soname again. So instead of directly uploading the new upstream version, I would like to wait for the following bugs to be resolved, first: affix: #358279 kdebluetooth: #358275 multisync: #358283 obexftp: needs upload of 0.19 (have to ask my sponsor :) I did not file

Re: for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

On 3/22/06, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:29:01AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > FYI, GMemChunk (old and deprecated by the upstream) was reimplemented to > > use GSlice, so no need to change or rebuild code to be affected due to buggy > > code. I don't kno

Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:38:00 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21:08, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:41:52 -0800, Hex Star wrote: >> > ah...russian spam...translated to english: >> >> [snip] >> >> Why bother? > > Gotta maximize the propagation of spam as m

Re: Re: Уникальные семинары!

boredom :P On 3/21/06, Daniel Gimpelevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:41:52 -0800, Hex Star wrote:> ah...russian spam...translated to english: [snip]Why bother?--To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Уникальные семинары!

Scripsit Daniel Gimpelevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wonderful. I've now received an auto-generated reply from someone on this > list to my previous message asking me to confirm that I really sent it, in > an effort to reduce spam. Would I be wrong in deciding not to make this > confirmation? Also, I

Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:06:20AM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > Wonderful. I've now received an auto-generated reply from someone on this > list to my previous message asking me to confirm that I really sent it, in > an effort to reduce spam. Those autoreplies are being sent to every subscri

Re: which packages are older/missing?

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I have two package lists, and want to find out which packages are > missing in one of the lists or are older than in the other list. Of > course, it's easy to write such a program but if somebody has already > done that, I'd try to safe the effor

Re: automatically install -dev packages

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 01:59, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 20-Mar-06, 14:37 (CST), David Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a setting somewhere I can set to cause apt-get and aptitude to > > always install corresponding -dev packages? The default behavior of not > > installing them

Re: for those who care about GNOME^w glib applications.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:29:01AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > There's a workaround that is run the application as follows: > > > $ G_SLICE=always-malloc application > > Thanks for the information. Can you explain (or provide a pointer to) why > > these bugs are application bugs rather tha

Re: Re: ?????????? ????????!

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:33:35AM -0800, Hex Star wrote: > boredom :P Please don't spam next time your bored. Some of us have better things to do. -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358480: RM: krb4 -- obsolete

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Mikael asked me to remove krb4 from Debian because he no longer has time: Mikael> I'm not maintaining it and I think that all kerberos4 Mikael> support should be removed from debian because it's Mikael> unsecure and the kerberos4kth packages sh

Linux kernel upgrade & udev

I just did a kernel upgrade from 2.6.8 to 2.6.15, but I do have my root partition on a RAID 1 config, and the initramfs stops with a message about /dev/md0 not existing. There is a problem of timing, udev waits too much to create the scsi devices /dev/sd[abc], so I did an script to wait for this f

Re: We want to honestly apoligize to the whole Debian Community

Our actions in the Debian Mailing Lists were uncalled for.  We honestly regret everything we said and did.  We want to specifically apoligize to the leadership of the Debian project and especially the DPL. We know that they are honest to goodness hard workers and are genuinly interested in the succ

Re: Linux kernel upgrade & udev

On Wednesday 22 March 2006 23:55, Jose Luis Rey wrote: > I just did a kernel upgrade from 2.6.8 to 2.6.15, but I do have my > root partition on a RAID 1 config, and the initramfs stops with a > message about /dev/md0 not existing. > > There is a problem of timing, udev waits too much to create the

Australian timezone (australasia) update for this weekend

Hello, The Australian timezone change is a couple of days away. If you are running servers depending on acurrate time, you will need to check or update them. If you are running sid (unstable) or etch (testing), to update your Australian timezone, just run 'apt-get update; apt-get install libc6'.

Re: We want to honestly apoligize to the whole Debian Community

Gregg Coner wrote: > Our actions in the Debian Mailing Lists were uncalled for. We honestly > regret everything we said and did. Good, now please just stop. -- .''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think : :' : I have ended up where I needed to be -- Douglas Adams `.

Re: We want to honestly apoligize to the whole Debian Community

On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:02, Gregg Coner wrote: > And plus, to the average user, the most up to date gnome is most > important. Haven't you heard? The average Gnome user is switching away from Gnome to other alternatives. Myself, I'm a KDE user currently, so why do I not propose to sync Deb

Re: Linux kernel upgrade & udev

also sprach Jose Luis Rey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.22.2355 +0100]: > There is a problem of timing, Have you upgraded busybox to the latest version? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian deve

Re: Linux kernel upgrade & udev

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.23.0116 +0100]: > also sprach Jose Luis Rey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.22.2355 +0100]: > > There is a problem of timing, > > Have you upgraded busybox to the latest version? #356868 maybe. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me

Re: We want to honestly apoligize to the whole Debian Community

also sprach Gregg Coner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.23.0002 +0100]: > Phase 1: Gnome is released and you spend the first entire month doing all the > crazy things to the package that should only be done in experimental with a > goal that at the end of the first month the package will be in Unstabl

bet there are no senior citizen developers

Bet there are also few developers over 45 years old. Probably 99% young, male. Bet there is no web page with developer age demographics. Anyway, at 45 things get fuzzy, at least for me, so I admire those older developers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Australian timezone (australasia) update for this weekend

Hi Aníbal, On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:22:37 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hello, The Australian timezone change is a couple of days away. If you > are running servers depending on acurrate time, you will need to check > or update them. > If you are running sid (unstable

Re: bet there are no senior citizen developers

Hi Dan, On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:27:18AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Bet there are also few developers over 45 years old. > Probably 99% young, male. > Bet there is no web page with developer age demographics. > Anyway, at 45 things get fuzzy, at least for me, so I admire > those older develope

Re: bet there are no senior citizen developers

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:27, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Bet there are also few developers over 45 years old. > Probably 99% young, male. > Bet there is no web page with developer age demographics. > Anyway, at 45 things get fuzzy, at least for me, so I admire > those older developers. You lost your bet.

RE: Australian timezone (australasia) update for this weekend

Why don't you just run: # zdump -v Australia/whatever | grep 2006 to find out? That is the only way to tell for sure. Michael. -Original Message- From: Hubert Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2006 11:12 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-devel@lists.

Re: Australian timezone (australasia) update for this weekend

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:11:39PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote: >Testing has libc6 2.3.6-3. Is it safe to assume that any 2.3.6 >version will have the correct time zone information? Yes. Bug #345479 was fixed in version 2.3.6-1 of glibc. http://bugs.debian.org/345479 Please follow up to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#357869: ITA: xfonts-thai-ttf - Thai TrueType fonts from NECTEC

Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #357869 Owner: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I intend to adopt xfonts-thai-ttf package, whose upstream project, thaifonts-scalable, has recently released a new version. In local APT repository, it has provided ttf-thai-tlwg instead of xfonts-thai-t

Bug#358544: ITP: gtk-im-libthai -- GTK+ Input Method Module using LibThai

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: gtk-im-libthai Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://libthai.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Descr

Bug#358541: ITP: pango-libthai -- LibThai Pango plugin with word break support

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: pango-libthai Version : 0.1.5 Upstream Author : Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://libthai.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Descri

Bug#358539: ITP: libthai -- library for Thai language supports

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libthai Version : 0.1.5 Upstream Author : Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://libthai.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Description

Re: libopenobex library transition

severity 358279 important severity 358275 important severity 358283 important thanks On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:55:39PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Sadly, they changed the soname again. So instead of directly uploading the > new upstream version, I would like to wait for the following bugs to

Re: bet there are no senior citizen developers

2006/3/22, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Bet there are also few developers over 45 years old.Probably 99% young, male.Bet there is no web page with developer age demographics.Anyway, at 45 things get fuzzy, at least for me, so I admirethose older developers. 48 years old and still enjoying debi

Re: bet there are no senior citizen developers

Joop PG4I wrote: > > 2006/3/22, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > Bet there are also few developers over 45 years old. > Probably 99% young, male. > Bet there is no web page with developer age demographics. > Anyway, at 45 things get fuzzy, at least