Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Thaddeus H. Black] > 3. If James' imperial rules are unacceptable to us, then the > alternative is to change the person in James' position. It has > been years since any other option was credible. We all know > this. This means dismissing James from his fortified posts of >

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-15 Thread Miles Bader
Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why try to make kde and gnome look the same? Well I don't know about other people, but for me it's partly a reaction to the "branding" Gnome and KDE already try to do. I personally run a mostly gnome env because I like some of the apps, but I don't feel

Re: buildd administration

2005-12-15 Thread Frank Küster
Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:26:50PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote: >> It sounds to me like what is needed as a tag for bugs that tells QA (you >> post noted that the release team >> would ignore RC bugs on packages not in testing) that it can ignore those >> bugs. > > If your pac

kernel 2.6.14

2005-12-15 Thread Richard Fojta
Hi, I've recently try to install new kernel. Somethings go wrong and I cannot found solution. There is some problem with configuration. It seems to me, that this problem is not unique. Does anybody know how to solve ti?

Re: kernel 2.6.14

2005-12-15 Thread Andrew Vaughan
Hi On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34, Richard Fojta wrote: > Hi, > I've recently try to install new kernel. Somethings go wrong and I cannot > found solution. There is some problem with configuration. It seems to me, > that this problem is not unique. Does anybody know how to solve ti? [This is probably m

Re: buildd administration

2005-12-15 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:43:05AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > If your package isn't going to be suitable for release; it should probably > > be in experimental instead, which is even autobuilt these days. There's > > almost no reason to have RC bugs that are open longer

Re: Bug#343368: ITP: unix2tcp -- connection forwarder that converts Unix sockets into TCP sockets

2005-12-15 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hello, * Radu Spineanu [Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:42:34PM +0200]: > * Package name: unix2tcp > Version : 0.8.2 > Upstream Author : Mihai Rusu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://dizzy.roedu.net/unix2tcp/ > * License : GPL > Description : connection forward

Re: kernel 2.6.14

2005-12-15 Thread Zejn Gasper
I've had the same experience yesterday, i didn't have time, so i downgraded to 2.6.12. But there's something wrong with the kernel. Greetings, Gasper Zejn On Thursday 15 of December 2005 13:23, Andrew Vaughan wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34, Richard Fojta wrote: > > Hi, > > I've rece

Re: [Pkg-ime-devel] ITP: kmfl -- Keyboard Mapping for Linux

2005-12-15 Thread Daniel Glassey
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 22:47 +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > Daniel Glassey schrieb: > > > KMFL is a keyboarding input method currently being developed under Linux > > which aims to bring Tavultesoft Keyman functionality to *nix operating > > systems. > > [...] > > All good, but what does

display-dhammapada

2005-12-15 Thread Jakub Nadolny
Hi, I am new to the list and would like to ask you what can I do in following subject. There is a package called 'display-dhammapada'. It has not been updated since few years. But there is new version of this software since few years also. I have send long time ago request to the package owner if

Re: kernel 2.6.14

2005-12-15 Thread Agustin Martin
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Zejn Gasper wrote: > I've had the same experience yesterday, i didn't have time, so i downgraded > to > 2.6.12. > > But there's something wrong with the kernel. Others wrote: > > > > Waiting 2 seconds /sys/block/hda/dev to show up. > > > > /bin/cat:/sy

Re: StrongARM tactics

2005-12-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:03:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 04:48:24PM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Which is great as a statement of principle, but it doesn't seem to offer > much as a practical recommendation; you don't get to be a buildd maintainer > by telling

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread A Mennucc
Anand Kumria wrote: >I'd like to congratulate our ftp-master team on their ability to timely >process packages progressing through the NEW queue. > > [1] > >I think you are an excellent example of people who are too busy for Debian. > >I must say that I am pa

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread A Mennucc
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: >On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > >That would have been me: > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg00997.html > > > at that time, you wrote/ / /"So, adding these two tentative conclusions together, it seems likel

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I assume the DPL has been working in the background to try to resolve > this, as an public and open power struggle between the DPL and the > people in key privileged positions would soon become very ugly, and > affect the Debian project badly. How

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread A Mennucc
hi I think that both sides are right: 1) people who express kudos to FTP-masters for express accepting new packages due to the C++ name transitions 2) Anand Kumria and Thaddeus Black criticizing FTP-masters for never addressing 'mplayer' 'xvidcap' 'rte' and such I can understand why nobody i

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Andrew Saunders
On 12/15/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there is a serious risk that these people would so blatantly > disregard our constitution That certainly seems to be the case, judging from the discussion that followed Bdale's "Structural Evolution" Debconf5 talk[1] - here's a tran

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > But it is not doing a great job with processing a few old uploads. I > > consider it a problem that no decision have been taken on the few > > really old uploads (xvidcap, rte, mplayer). > > One

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) people who express kudos to FTP-masters for express accepting new > packages due to the C++ name transitions > > 2) Anand Kumria and Thaddeus Black criticizing FTP-masters for never > addressing 'mplayer' 'xvidcap' 'rte' and such Once again, I think t

Re: petsc_2.3.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2005-12-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 15:05 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:29:11PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Did you receive this email or any of this thread? It's now more than > > two weeks old, and I'd really like to upload a new PETSc 2.3.0 ASAP. > > So upload it? If you've

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Russ Allbery
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW: I know that 'mplayer' has always been fishy business in Debian > but what did 'xvidcap' ever do wrong? AFAICT the only problem may be > that 'xvidcap' contains FFMPEG code ; but FFMPEG has been in Debian for > quite long now, so I do not really unde

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:08:07PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > When one doesn't know, the right thing to do is frequently both not make > the problem worse and not overreact, meaning leaving ffmpeg in the archive > and xvidcap in NEW until the situation is clearly understood and resolved > is quit

Re: congratulations to our ftp-master team

2005-12-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:54:34PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > >On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > >That would have been me: > > > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg00997.html > > at that time, you wrote/ >

Re: Unstable status

2005-12-15 Thread Joey Hess
Kai Hendry wrote: > Kamaraju Kusumanchi has started a Wiki page where I hope to see current > (as of today) *major* (blocking) unstable upgrade issues linked from: > > http://wiki.debian.org/StatusOfUnstable We've done this for d-i for several months (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstallerToday)

Work-needing packages report for Dec 16, 2005

2005-12-15 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 187 (new: 0) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 94 (new: 5) Total number of packages requeste