Attachment file : body.scr
Virus name : W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action taken: Unable to Clean...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Simon Josefsson:
>
>> I explain the current problems, and I try to put together a proposed
>> update, and I have a petition online at:
>>
>> http://josefsson.org/bcp78broken/
>
> Very nice, thanks.
>
> I think you might get broader support in the vend
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Upgrading to SHA-1 is still a good idea, of course,
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't there been collision attacks on
> SHA-1, too?
Yes, but to public knowledge they're only feasible with government grade
hardware, while MD5 i
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thursday 06 October 2005 06:57, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>>> I know the copying conditions of IETF RFC's has been a concern for
>>> Debian in the past, and that the RFCs has been removed from the
>>> off
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:29:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051006 17:13]:
> > sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > and furthermore, there are some of us who have been quietly waiting for
> > > things to settle down from the previous major trans
Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:16:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Thu, 06 Oct 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
Unlimited distribution isn't the problem. Modification and
redistribut
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> is the run for openssl 0.9.8 started anyway? i have curl and
> libapache-mod-ssl ready for the upload.
I am going to hold out and wait at least a week. I want to know what the
release team will do re. 0.9.8.
PLEASE, let's take the opportunity to ena
Jeroen van Wolffelaar schrieb:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>>a lot of people bugged me about the new version and upstream only recommends
>>this version. It also closes a grave security bug.
>
> Hm, that wasn't listed in the changelog. Anyway, there hasn'
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But I don't think that versioning the
> >symbols in Debian alone would be such a good idea. Than we would be
> >incompatible with other distributions.
Then mail the other distro maintainers and upstream, they will listen t
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:07:01PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>>Package: wnpp
>>Severity: normal
>>
>>
>>I request assistance with maintaining the openssl package.
>>
>>I am currently the only maintainer, but this package really needs a
>>team to work on it. Too many p
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> A few weeks ago, libpng10-0 was removed from the archive. A
> consequence of this was that all gnome-1 packages (and there are a
> number still around) instantly became FTBFS.
(s/FTBFS/uninstallable?)
> Packages which link against
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:12:33AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > is the run for openssl 0.9.8 started anyway? i have curl and
> > libapache-mod-ssl ready for the upload.
>
> I am going to hold out and wait at least a week. I want to k
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> A few weeks ago, libpng10-0 was removed from the archive. A
>> consequence of this was that all gnome-1 packages (and there are a
>> number still around) instantly became FTBFS.
> (
Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then please go to the alioth project pkg-openssl and subscribe to the
> mailing list. Also get yourself an alioth account (if you not already
> have one) and let me know your login namen.
The alioth login name for DDs is their Debian login.
Regards,
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:53:34 -0700]:
> Please recompile and upload packages which you maintain as these
> versions become available on the arch you use for development work.
> When you have recompiled, please *check* to make sure that the only
> libpng linked into your package
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2005 à 22:20 +0200, Christoph Martin a écrit :
> I however understand the problem with different libraries linked against
> different versions of openssl. But I don't think that versioning the
> symbols in Debian alone would be such a good idea. Than we would be
> incompatible w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krystian Wlosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: aylet
Version : 0.4.0
* URL : http://rus.members.beeb.net/aylet.html
* License : GPL
Description : player for Spectrum '.ay' music files
aylet plays music files in
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:12:38AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Having the DNS and /etc/hosts give different results is asking for
> trouble. RFC 1912 says that this discussion was had in the past and
> the conclusion was "localhost.".
Note that that discussion was about appending the local
* Domenico Andreoli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051007 10:59]:
> is the run for openssl 0.9.8 started anyway? i have curl and
> libapache-mod-ssl ready for the upload.
There is nothing one can stop anymore. It will be tied with the
c++-abi-transition soon enough.
Cheers,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
* Simon Josefsson:
>> I think you might get broader support in the vendor community if you
>> make the license for modified copying non-copyleft.
>
> Yes, that is the intention. Requiring a copyleft license is likely to
> meet with disapproval from too many people, for various reasons.
But isn't
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:44:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> No, they won't, because INN ignores hostnames that do not contain a period
> for the purposes of generating external identifiers, specifically to keep
> from using things like localhost or other unqualified names that aren't
> globall
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:45:24AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Those asumptions are not false, they are what they are: asumptions. If you
> dont want to configure your system that way, just dont use it.
That is what I say: every Debian package that uses "hostname -f" is
bogus, because it reli
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Changing the canonical name of localhost is an arbitrary change that
> breaks more than MySQL. It also violates the principle of least
> astonishment.
Then fix those other broken things as well. If you want localhost-style
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Simon Josefsson:
>
>>> I think you might get broader support in the vendor community if you
>>> make the license for modified copying non-copyleft.
>>
>> Yes, that is the intention. Requiring a copyleft license is likely to
>> meet with disapproval fr
2005/10/7, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, only in one direction if I remember my versioning rules correctly.
> Consider the following cases:
> * binary built against unversioned libssl from other distro, running with
> versioned libssl on Debian
> Breaks because it can't find the sym
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> The problem would be if two different groups go and version the
> symbols in a different way (OPENSSL_0.9.8 vs OPENSSL_0_9_8). But as
I will repeat myself once: just hunt down and email the openssl maintainers
for: SuSE, RH/Fedora, Mandriva, Ge
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
>> beneficial to at least document such security issues, by informing security
>> team, filing an RC bug on your own package, and mentioning the CVE ID (or at
>> the very least, a short description of the bug fixed) in your changelog
>> entry.
>
> It is documented
Hi,
> 192008
I think this bug is discussing something like
$ apt-cache show d-shlibs
Package: d-shlibs
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 84
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 0.27
Depends: binutils, debianutils (>= 1.6)
Filename: pool/main/
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 06, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > .localdomain is such a peace of shit which only makes troubles. So
> Please explain which troubles.
Mine with MySQL. And the reason why I initiated this thread. :)
MySQL defin
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:44:42PM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:24:12PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Oct 2005, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > >
> > > IIRC The main reason was described in #247734
> >
> > ARGH!
> >
> > If that bug was t
Hi!
Согласно статистике московских кадровых агенств знание
английского языка повышает вероятность получить работу
-начальные знания-5%
-хорошие знания-на 20%
-отличные знания-на 60%
Мы повысим Ваши шансы на трудоустройство на 60%!!!
Большие скидки!!!
В Москве наши телефоны следующие:
один-ноль-
The following message sent by this account has violated system policy:
From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:17:53 -0400
Subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The following violations were detected:
--- Scan information follows ---
Vir
Hi there,
I just tried to figure out why the jack-audio-connection-kit can't go
into testing, and after some investigation I came to the conclusion
that it might never go in without help. [1]
Is there someone who shares this opinion or am I missing something ?
For my part, I would be happier if
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:50:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Suggestions on improving the arch criteria are still welcome on the
> debian-devel list.
Hello Steve!
My suggestion would be to drop the arch criteria completly. The time
and energy wasted performing the requalification will delay
Scripsit "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:45, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> I notice that the newest upload of pstoedit has reverted the C++
>> transition name change; instead of libpstoedit0c2 sid now contains
>> libpstoedit0, as in sarge.
> This is, IMHO, inco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fsl
Version : 3.2
Upstream Author : Analysis Group, FMRIB, Oxford, UK. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/
* License : non-free (see
http://www.fmri
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:04:44PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> That is what I say: every Debian package that uses "hostname -f" is
> bogus, because it relies on a certain system configuration.
Umm, I guess all debian packages relies on certain configurations.
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, how would INN react if it sees a "normal-looking" name (like
> foo.bar.com) that in turn resolves to 127.0.0.1? It's been a long time
> since I last run a news server and I used Diablo instead of INN so I'm
> not familiar with INN's internals. But it
To: lists.debian.org
Hi,
I have not heard back from you.
I sent you an email about a week ago on September 29, and
received no response.
But I know that sometimes website owners are really busy,
and my first email can sometimes go overlooked.
So I've sent this 2nd email message to follow
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
Description : analysis tools for FMRI, MRI and DTI brain imaging
Great target for Debian-Med. I will tag it [med-imaging] once it is
available in the BTS.
If someone is interested in contributing to this packaging attempt,
please contact me.
S
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:47:00PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 octobre 2005 à 22:20 +0200, Christoph Martin a écrit :
> > I however understand the problem with different libraries linked against
> > different versions of openssl. But I don't think that versioning the
> > symbols in
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > You are right - as so often.
> > People are still required to speak with the release team first. But some
> > people prefer to make all of our life harder then necessary.
> > Please again: If someone wants to make any transiti
Hello,
There is a patch to support AUTH TLS in ftp-ssl. I don't have any facilities to
test whether it work or not. Could somebody check these codes and test it
please?
PS: I don't subscribe to this list, please CC me.
Thanks,
Cai Qian
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Cai Qian,
here comes a patch wh
Hi,
From since about yesterday, on my amd64 box,
etch(testing) is failing to bootstrap with the following message:
O: Setting up exim4-config (4.52-2) ...
P: Configuring package exim4-config
O: hostname:
O: Host name lookup failure
O:
O: hostname:
O: Host name lookup failure
O:
O: Adding system-
Hi,
> I just tried to figure out why the jack-audio-connection-kit can't go
> into testing, and after some investigation I came to the conclusion
> that it might never go in without help. [1]
>
> Is there someone who shares this opinion or am I missing something ?
> For my part, I would be happie
45 matches
Mail list logo
