martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libhibernate-java?
libhibernate-java is correct as per the Debian Java Packaging Policy.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
--
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [CC'ed Thomas Bushnell, since he has filed an ITA on gwrapguile]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> Please, check the following bugs, rename or close them, however you prefer.
>>
>>
>> 1) #242467: ITA: gwrapguile -- Tool for exporting C libraries in
Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 00:05 -0400, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
> libpng2 and libpng10 are gone.
>
> This has caused quite a lot of uninstallable packages which either need
> new uploads or removal (listed below). In addition, imlib1 and gdk-imlib1
> exist solely for libpng10 support (imlib1
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:05:32AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Furthermore, the plan is to remove GNOME 1 entirely, as noted at:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2005/06/msg00025.html
>
> If your package depends on one of these and you wish to keep it in Debian,
> please convert it
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:05:32AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Furthermore, the plan is to remove GNOME 1 entirely, as noted at:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2005/06/msg00025.html
>>
>> If your package depends on one of these and y
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Furthermore, the plan is to remove GNOME 1 entirely
(debian-devel readers: this discussion is more on topic on
debian-gtk-gnome, and is continuing there.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Do not delete packages just because you think nobody *should* use
them; delete them because nobody *does* use them. Right now, the
gnome-1 packages are still used.
... same for imlib1 which is used as well.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
ht
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Furthermore, the plan is to remove GNOME 1 entirely
>
> (debian-devel readers: this discussion is more on topic on
> debian-gtk-gnome, and is continuing there.)
The gnome-1 libraries are in use by other D
Hi,
On Monday 26 September 2005 23:39, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Don't know why, but the content is supposed to be moving to
> wiki.debian.org real soon now.
For moving the contents help is still needed (perl skills prefered), please
see http://wiki.debian.org/MigrationStatus
regards,
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Anyone who does not want to maintain a package should orphan the damn
> thing. It seems that it is only the gnome maintainers who do not
> understand this simple principle. Do not declare what other people
> can or should maintain, s
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:39:28AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:52:31PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > yes, i'm aware of this. it is due to the libcurl-gnutls.so.3 soname
> > still being libcurl.so.3. everything else is in place for a good upload.
> >
> > as of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-benchmark
Version : 1.2.3
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Benchmark/
* License : PHP License
Description : PEAR framework to benchmark PHP scripts or functio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-phpunit2
Version : 2.2.1
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/PHPUnit2/
* License : PHP License
Description : PEAR Regression testing framework for unit tests
PH
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Anyone who does not want to maintain a package should orphan the damn
>> thing. It seems that it is only the gnome maintainers who do not
>> understand this simple principle. Do not declare what other p
ti, 2005-09-27 kello 05:14 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG kirjoitti:
> And I'm saying that this is not sufficient, it needs to be here, on
> debian-devel, since it concerns more than just packages maintained by
> the debian-gtk-gnome team.
>From http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/:
Pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sysconftool
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.courier-mta.org/sysconftool/
* License : GPL
Description : developmen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 26/set/05, alle ore 19:57, Joey Hess ha scritto:
Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libapache-mod-acct
Fixed yesterday in 0.5-19.
Regards,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8
Hi,
I intend to rename the binary packages for mysql++ with the upload of 2.0.5.
They've been called libsqlplus* for a while now, which isn't overly
intuitive (I've had multiple people not realize mysql++ was packaged for
debian, due to the name). My choices are either libmysqlpp* (to match
the l
[Moving this discussion to debian-devel. The context is the recent upload
of the slgdbm package, which is the fisrt package in Debian to provide an
SLang2 module. Please, keep Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 08:19]:
> On 26.09.05, Paul Boekholt wrote:
>
> >
hi,
I recently opened my web site www.comerciomerida.com and I want to earn some money from the net. I would like to be part of your project.
My name is Juan Pablo Merida and my phone is 502-52073145, i÷m from Guatemala city Central America
Hi, Sylvain:
El Viernes, 16 Septiembre 2005 16:12, Sylvain Beucler escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple Debian packages that I need to patch with custom local
> changes. The patches are small and I hence can follow the security
> updates from the security team.
>
> However, I wonder if there's a
Hi, Sami:
El Domingo, 18 Septiembre 2005 23:22, Sami Dalouche escribió:
> OK, may be an overkill.
> But what happens with your solution if skype depends on libskype, which is
> not available from debian's repository ?The user has to download several
> .debs in order to install a single software ?
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-26 19:57]:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
>> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>> so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aptsh
Version : 0.0.4
Upstream Author : Marcin Wrochniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://aptsh.berlios.de
* License : GPL
Description : apt interactive shell
Aptsh helps in managing packages by providi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:15:11AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:19:30PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > >>> I got an iss
Hello all,
I'm struggling to wrap my feeble intelect around the debian installation
scripts, so I thought I would take a gander at the scripts in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ and see how other people handle things. I've come accross
several statements that I don't understand, and that aren't documented
a
Hi,
Michael S. Peek wrote:
dpkg --assert-support-predepends
dpkg --assert-working-epoch
These are simple do-nothing options, but older dpkg will fail if it
doesn't know them, so if a feature isn't present, dpkg will not start.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
* Package name: libmms
Version : 0.1
Current developers:
Maciej Katafiasz (Mathrick) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SÃren Hansen (shawarma) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Original implementatio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-hi
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Swapnil Hajare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/
* License : GPL
Description : Aspell wordlist for Hindi
Hindi language wordlist for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-mr
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Swapnil Hajare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/
* License : GPL
Description : Aspell Marathi wordlist
Marathi language wordlist for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-or
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/
* License : GPL
Description : Aspell Oriya wordlist
Oriya language wordlist for GNU As
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-pa
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Amanpreet Singh Alam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/
* License : GPL
Description : Aspell Wordlist for Punjabi
Punjabi language wor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-ta
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : http://developer.thamizha.com/spellchecker
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/
* License : GPL
Description : Aspell wordlist for Tamil
Tamil language wordl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: w3chess
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : Sirtobi
* URL : http://w3chess.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : web
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
[Moving this discussion to debian-devel. The context is the recent upload
of the slgdbm package, which is the fisrt package in Debian to provide an
SLang2 module. Please, keep Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 08:19]:
On 26.09.0
* Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 21:16]:
> My preference is for slang-foo, as it is more visible that it is
> a slang-related, rather than a generic DSO; slang-gdbm is more
> interesting to a slang developer than to a gdbm one, and this shows that.
Thanks for the advice. I w
On Sep 19 18:25+0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 19, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's arguable how much drivers blacklisting is critical.
I've had a fair amount of trouble with hotplug loading modules that
cause a kernel panic (esp. on laptops). In this case,
On Sep 27, Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a fair amount of trouble with hotplug loading modules that
> cause a kernel panic (esp. on laptops). In this case, what would you
> recommend as a replacement for blacklisting?
module-init-tools blacklisting.
Anyway, I implemented sup
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:12:07AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:04:24PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >found 181378 2.5.1.ds2-1
> >thanks
> >
> >* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [Mon, 26 Sep 2005 05:47:06 -0700]:
> >
> >> * Removed 64-egf-speedup.patch, 65-d
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:53:41PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:12:07AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:04:24PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>>* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [Mon, 26 Sep 2005 05:47:06 -0700]:
>>>
* Removed 64-egf-sp
ATTN developers of openoffice org (and gnumeric)
Hi
I was succesfully running openoffice org on a testing debian running
KDE.
Last
week after recent security and library updates openoffice org on testing is
busted.
(fortunately I have another machine running debian stable KDE. op
Thomas Bushnell wrote:
>Do not delete packages just because you think nobody *should* use
>them; delete them because nobody *does* use them.
I am suggesting deleting them because nobody *can* use them.
Unless libpng10 is brought back, none of these packages are usable. Are you
volunteering to p
Steve Langasek wrote (in reference to gdk-imlib1):
>No, there isn't. It should only need to be rebuilt against the newer
>libpng.
Ah, excellent news. Why wasn't this done *before* removing libpng10?
Because the imlib package maintainer is dropping them and nobody else
understood the state of the
Hi,
pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
However, you do need to use the sid version of pbuilder
and cdebootstrap for things to work.
Also, with changes to 'su'; pbuilder stable backports
to be a requirement.
I've moved ove
Hi,
I maintain the Debian XMLTV packages. I no longer use these packages,
and I would like to give up maintaining them. I would normally just
file an O: and be done with it, but there are a lot of XMLTV users, and
I don't want to leave them completely hanging. So, I'm looking for
someone to tak
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:01:26PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell wrote:
> >Do not delete packages just because you think nobody *should* use
> >them; delete them because nobody *does* use them.
> I am suggesting deleting them because nobody *can* use them.
> Unless libpng10 is
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:48:39PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
Hi
> I maintain the Debian XMLTV packages. I no longer use these packages,
> and I would like to give up maintaining them.
I use xmltv and I'd like to adopt it.
> I'm willing to stick around as a co-maintainer for a while if t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:10:19AM +0200, Mathias Weyland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:48:39PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > I maintain the Debian XMLTV packages. I no longer use these packages,
> > and I would like to give up maintaining them.
>
> I use xmltv and I'd like to adopt i
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell wrote:
>>Do not delete packages just because you think nobody *should* use
>>them; delete them because nobody *does* use them.
> I am suggesting deleting them because nobody *can* use them.
>
> Unless libpng10 is brought back, none of
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:01:26PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Thomas Bushnell wrote:
>> >Do not delete packages just because you think nobody *should* use
>> >them; delete them because nobody *does* use them.
>> I am suggesting deleting them beca
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek wrote (in reference to gdk-imlib1):
>>No, there isn't. It should only need to be rebuilt against the newer
>>libpng.
> Ah, excellent news. Why wasn't this done *before* removing libpng10?
> Because the imlib package maintainer is drop
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:39:59PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:15:11AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:19:30PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:
I know you want to scold me because this is not a formal bug report. I
find
that form overwhelming.
What form? Do you know reportbug?
Your chances to reach the relevant people are drastically higher if you file
a bug report against the package in q
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, the removal of libpng10 was probably premature, and I wouldn't
> have done it with so many packages still depending on it. I would
> have orphaned it instead. But it's been done now. There are two
> ways to deal with that: put it back in the a
Quoting Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Everybody who has apt-listchanges installed, for a start.
> And if they don't, too bad for them.
Well, I agree that people using unstable really should install
apt-listchanges.
However, what about testing and future stable users?
Our installer does n
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:32:41 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 05:07:31AM -0400, Alfie Costa wrote:
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find constructs like ${string#*=} particularly difficult to read,
> since they require that I remember what all the different punctuation
56 matches
Mail list logo
