* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-26 19:57]: > Joey Hess wrote: >> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend >> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. >> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these >> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 >> bugs. > (Original post here: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) > > This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, > down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not > read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is
where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not?
So long,
Alfie [doing his updates]
P.S.: Yes, you are right. I ceaced to read debian-devel for quite a
while due to the sheer mass of noise ratio. So Cc: me on replies
that you think might be interesting to me, too. Honor the
Mail-Followup-To: header.
--
<snowcrash> ZZcd ..
<snowcrash> oops
-- #jutesack
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
