暑い中いかがお過ごしでしょうか。

2005-08-07 Thread perfection
高級セレブ在籍のサポートクラブ『パーフェクション』です。 今までにこんな経験をなされた方はいらっしゃらないでしょうか? ①相手を選別する際に長い時間を費やしてしまった。 ②サークル入会金に何十万円も費やしてしまった。 ③入会した後サークル側から何もサポートがない。 ④女性会員がVIPなので保証金を払ってほしいと言われた。 ⑤サークルを退会する際退会費用を請求された。 - ※パーフェクションでは上記する事態はありえません。ではご説明

Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Metzler
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [command -v] > It is not even useful as a which(1) replacement. Whereas "which" > prints the pathname of the first executable file on the PATH, > "command -v" prints the pathname of the first executable file on the > PATH _or_ the pathname of the first non-ex

Re: Documentation of alioth?

2005-08-07 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2005 à 09:31 +0200, Florian Weimer a écrit : > This is ridiculous. With this attitude, you will never receive any > substantial help with alioth system administration. It's unlikely > that anyone who Sorry, I can't offer something better... but as you see, you can help aliot

Re: Documentation of alioth?

2005-08-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Raphaël Hertzog: > Sorry, I can't offer something better... but as you see, you can help > alioth admins without having a local gforge since you diagnosed a > problem. What's the benefit of diagnosing the problem if it isn't fixed? > At least that way all alioth admins would know precisely the

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Ondrej Sury
Hi, I have submitted new upstream project, since I am author of mod_vhost_ldap :-(. Who I should contact about this issue? Ondrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your project registration for Alioth has been denied. Project Full Name: mod_vhost_ldap Project Unix Name: modvhostldap Reasons for

Re: Documentation of alioth?

2005-08-07 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Le dimanche 07 août 2005 à 11:39 +0200, Florian Weimer a écrit : > What's the benefit of diagnosing the problem if it isn't fixed? It lets people with the required privileges fix the problem without having to investigate it first. > Those with sufficient privilege obviously do not read the tracke

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:31:15AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > Hi, > > I have submitted new upstream project, since I am author of > mod_vhost_ldap :-(. Who I should contact about this issue? > > Ondrej > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ^ Can't we do better than this? >

Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading

2005-08-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Marcelo E. Magallon] > The list and script can be found in > http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/gcc-transition/ Are you going to keep it up to date? Is it generated using a cronjob, or do you update it manually? It would be great if someone could add a link to your updated graph from http://p

Re: curl reverts to openssl (but the story does not ends here)

2005-08-07 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Domenico Andreoli told: > reopen 318590 > thanks > > hi dear developers, > > it looks like i completely underestimated the transition of curl > to gnutls [0]. so i have just made a new upload which settles > the things back to openssl. Bad idea to

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Le dimanche 07 août 2005 à 11:31 +0200, Ondrej Sury a écrit : > Hi, > > I have submitted new upstream project, since I am author of > mod_vhost_ldap :-(. Who I should contact about this issue? [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you could state that while requesting the project, it would simplify the work of

Re: Asking Debconf questions about database data

2005-08-07 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i think it's kind of pointless to ask such a question at install time. > because Debian Is Not A Registry(tm) And supposedly debconf isn't one either :-) > you have no guarantee that the debconf responses won't be nuked off > before the package is remov

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le dimanche 07 août 2005 à 21:20 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:31:15AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have submitted new upstream project, since I am author of > > mod_vhost_ldap :-(. Who I should contact about this issue? BTW, the alioth admin team i

Re: possible ICU transition

2005-08-07 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I've uploaded ICU 3.4. Once it clears new, people who depend upon icu28 or embed icu in their packages can try it. Read on if you care about ICU. Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Given all this, can anyone think of any reason why I should not start >> an ICU transition this weekend

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 8/7/05, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le dimanche 07 août 2005 à 21:20 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:31:15AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have submitted new upstream project, since I am author of > > > mod_vhost_ldap :-(. Who

Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading

2005-08-07 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If someone knows of a way to get graphviz to produce something > _readable_ please let me know. I managed to produce a readable (still huge) graph by cheating and omitting dependencies on qt-x11-free and kdelibs, instead showing those by the

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Sun, Aug 07, 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > We can probably. Would you care to provide us the patch ? > A patch to change a from email address? I suppose it's nice to: - spot where the change needs to be made - move that to a configuration file if it's not already in a confi

Re: Fedora Directory Server port to Debian ?

2005-08-07 Thread Paul Wise
Hi, > Is somebody working on porting/packaging FDS to Debian? Since no-one answered you yet, I presume not. However, it has been built on debian, please read the RFP bug and a couple of mails on a redhat list: http://bugs.debian.org/315297 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/2

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote: debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper. Hm

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Juan Manuel Garcia Molina
Hi. On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00:46, Joey Hess wrote: > Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >    facturalux Fixed locally, it will be included in next upload. >    moodle-book I have just uploaded a package with the correction included. Regards, Juanma. -- Juan Manuel Gar

Re: What is going on with udev?

2005-08-07 Thread Steve Greenland
On 06-Aug-05, 17:42 (CDT), "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That said, what exactly is the problem kernel-image-x.y.z providing a > kernel image for *bsd or hurd or whatever on the matching platform? Bug reports. Steve -- Steve Greenland The irony is that Bill Gates

Bug#321795: O: lg-* -- lg-* - Linux Gazette, 111 packages

2005-08-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi People, i now go and O: all the lg-* packages from the Linux Gazette. That are about 111 packages right now, I wont upload them all just to set the email address to the qa-group. :) If someone wants to take them please consider the following points: - They have

Re: Fedora Directory Server port to Debian ?

2005-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is somebody working on porting/packaging FDS to Debian? > http://bugs.debian.org/315297 Bad package description. It tells me something I don't care about (namely the acronym expansion of LDAP) and none of the things I do care about (why would I want this

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote: >> debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has >> been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf >> began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in >> depend

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Roland Mas
Loïc Minier, 2005-08-07 17:10:06 +0200 : > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> > We can probably. Would you care to provide us the patch ? >> A patch to change a from email address? > > I suppose it's nice to: > - spot where the change needs to be made > - move tha

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2005-08-07 Thread Ondrej Sury
Raphaël Hertzog wrote: Le dimanche 07 août 2005 à 11:31 +0200, Ondrej Sury a écrit : Hi, I have submitted new upstream project, since I am author of mod_vhost_ldap :-(. Who I should contact about this issue? [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you could state that while requesting the project, it would

Re: What is going on with udev?

2005-08-07 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:59:51AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 06-Aug-05, 17:42 (CDT), "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That said, what exactly is the problem kernel-image-x.y.z > > providing a kernel image for *bsd or hurd or whatever on the > > matching platform

Bug#321808: O: ecb -- Code browser for several languages for Emacs.

2005-08-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi Orphaning ecb. Description: Code browser for several languages for Emacs. ECB is source code browser for Emacs. It is a global minor-mode which displays a couple of windows that can be used to browse directories, files and methods. It supports method parsing

Bug#321821: O: doxymacs -- E-lisp package for making doxygen usage easier under Emacs

2005-08-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi I now orphan doxymacs. Description: E-lisp package for making doxygen usage easier under Emacs The purpose of the doxymacs project is to create a LISP package that will make using Doxygen from within {X}Emacs easier. I upload a version fixing its bugs and sett

Re: curl reverts to openssl (but the story does not ends here)

2005-08-07 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: [1] yes, recently a thread talked right about curl and openssl vs. gnutls, but evidently i didn't see what i call a general consensus. IMHO provide both, ssl and gnutls. I can only agree. Even when libcurl works identically good using ei

Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4

2005-08-07 Thread Thomas Hood
Andreas Metzler wrote: > Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [command -v] > > It is not even useful as a which(1) replacement. Whereas "which" > > prints the pathname of the first executable file on the PATH, > > "command -v" prints the pathname of the first executable file on the > > PATH _o

Re: Fedora Directory Server port to Debian ?

2005-08-07 Thread Paul Wise
Hi, > > > Is somebody working on porting/packaging FDS to Debian? > > > http://bugs.debian.org/315297 > > Bad package description. It tells me something I don't care about (namely > the acronym expansion of LDAP) and none of the things I do care about (why > would I want this package rather tha

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Russ Allbery wrote: debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Kęstutis Biliūnas
An, 2005 08 02 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess rašė: > Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >ispell-lt Fixed and the new package is in incoming now. -- Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >xpilot I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >xpilot > > I offered this for adoption a while back. Nobody took up my offer. I > finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Debian Adduser Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > adduser Fixed version in svn, will be uploaded when the current unstable versio has migrated to testing. >Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > clamav-data > clamav-getfiles

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:13 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot? > > If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it > to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion. I'm still holding out for the remote cha

Re: not starting daemons at boot: ln -s disabled

2005-08-07 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Dan Jacobson wrote: > One way of having some daemons not start at boot (e.g., if we only use > our printer once a year) is to remove certain /etc/rc?.d/ links. Hmmm, does init respect policy-rc.d? If so, it'd be fairly easy to do it that way... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to > be clever enough to ignore the lines > >. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule >db_get "shared/zope/restart" || true > > in the postinst file because the package depends from a package >

Re: Asking Debconf questions about database data

2005-08-07 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Henning Makholm wrote: > It is at least conceivable for the postinst to actively store the > reply in an appropriate file in /etc which the postrm later reads. > > Not that I think this would make much sense UI-wise anyhow. Please, please don't do this! Consider what happens when the user instal

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared > debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope > products. I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your > suggestion, but the resulting Debian

Re: Asking Debconf questions about database data

2005-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW: Do you really even need to ask? Couldn't you just tell the admin, > if you want to delete your data, run dropdb foo? There is a small, but > certainly nonzero, risk of accidental deletion every time you ask. I > imagine that risk increases if,

Re: Asking Debconf questions about database data

2005-08-07 Thread sean finney
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:35:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > When one does that, people file bugs complaining that the package doesn't > remove all of the data it generates on installation. :) there's a similar problem with logfiles too, and there have been quite drawn out discussions in which

python's gettext.gettext broken, use gettext.lgettext

2005-08-07 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, While I was hacking at debconf, I noticed that python's gettext function returns strings encoded in the original encoding; which will appear as garbage on the screen. With python2.4, lgettext is added, which seems to do the right thing and return the string encoded in the current CODESET.

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:32:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Which does not really seem to work in all cases. I'm using a shared > > debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope > > products. I tried to replace the debcon

Bug#321886: ITP: driconf -- DRI configuration GUI

2005-08-07 Thread Michel Daenzer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: driconf Version : 0.2.6 Upstream Author : Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DriConf * License

Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading

2005-08-07 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:41:06PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/gcc-transition/ > > Are you going to keep it up to date? Is it generated using a > cronjob, or do you update it manually? After having fixed some glitches, yes, it is in a cronjob n

Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading

2005-08-07 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 04:37:51PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > > If someone knows of a way to get graphviz to produce something > > _readable_ please let me know. > > I managed to produce a readable (still huge) graph by cheating and > omitting dependencies on qt-x11-free and kdelibs,

Re: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please check your Debian E-Mail.

2005-08-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:00:33PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:58:33PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > I was finally able to acquire an SSP Build Host for you. > > If you are still interest. Please contact me. > > A bit quick off the mark there, Greg! I think I've re

Re: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please check your Debian E-Mail.

2005-08-07 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:12:56PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > The SSP compiler is a patch against GCC and offers "Stack Smashing > > Protection". In short it gives protection against buffer overflow > > bugs, and attacks. > > Steve, you are aware that GCC 4.1 will include a complet

Re: python's gettext.gettext broken, use gettext.lgettext

2005-08-07 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 07:45 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > While I was hacking at debconf, I noticed that > python's gettext function returns strings encoded in the > original encoding; which will appear as garbage on > the screen. The best way to do gettext in Python is to do: gettex

Re: Asking Debconf questions about database data

2005-08-07 Thread Joey Hess
Russ Allbery wrote: > As co-maintainer of one of the affected packages, I'm quite happy to go > along with the general consensus, since I don't really care. There seemed > to be a dislike of debconf questions in prerm and there was some precedent > for asking this sort of question in postinst, so

Re: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please check your Debian E-Mail.

2005-08-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:31:40AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:12:56PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > The SSP compiler is a patch against GCC and offers "Stack Smashing > > > Protection". In short it gives protection against buffer overflow > > > bugs, and

Re: OT: Bruce Perens spamming -devel?

2005-08-07 Thread Ali Milis
Kari Laine wrote: > And I sure someone will point out that my english suck :-) OK, I can not resist to take this bait. s/suck/sucks/ And now I am wondering; how many will put my address into their .procmail filters. Duh! -- Ali Milis.

Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading

2005-08-07 Thread Mike Furr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > It would be great if someone could add a link to your updated graph > from http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/>. It would make sure > at least I find it when I need it. Done. I also added links to the two other transitio

Re: Asking Debconf questions about database data

2005-08-07 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Russ Allbery wrote: > When one does that, people file bugs complaining that the package doesn't > remove all of the data it generates on installation. :) > > [...] It's not a great solution, and I'm happy to change > if someone else has a better idea. Well, I think the real answer is that just

Re: OT: Bruce Perens spamming -devel?

2005-08-07 Thread Nigel Jones
Has anyone considered that all these personal attacks/claims the original is spam... is actually in itself spam, in exactly the same way, actually Joe Bloggs down the street could subscribe by accident and claim it's all spam because it's "un-wanted". On 04/08/05, Anders Breindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTE