On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Domenico Andreoli told: > reopen 318590 > thanks > > hi dear developers, > > it looks like i completely underestimated the transition of curl > to gnutls [0]. so i have just made a new upload which settles > the things back to openssl.
Bad idea to switch to ssl only :( > i don't want to start any transition right now, also because > upstream developer made me note that the gnutls support is still > young. But still works ;-) > these are bad news for those gpl packages waiting for libcurl with > no openssl. they will have to wait a little more. i'm sorry for > this. It is quit easy to create separated gnutls-packages. > in talking about the solution IMHO things get hotter. ? > probably the next simpler solution is to add libcurl3-gnutls and, > if required, libcurl3-gnutls-dev packages. but somebody could > prefer a -nossl version (like that still in woody, the one i > should have never removed). Readd it! [...] > i continue to think that having only a curl+gnutls package is the > long term solution but i'll be glad to hear also your opinion and > suggestions. [1] Should be short term. As mentioned many times before, do it ;-) [...] > [1] yes, recently a thread talked right about curl and openssl vs. > gnutls, but evidently i didn't see what i call a general > consensus. IMHO provide both, ssl and gnutls. Elimar -- It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
