Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Don Armstrong]
>> All that needs to happen is that GPLed packages without an OpenSSL
>> linking exception either need to:
>>
>> 1) Get a linking exception.
>> 2) Stop linking with OpenSSL.
>
> 3) For indirect dependencies: make sure you're on
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:02:53AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Don Armstrong]
> > All that needs to happen is that GPLed packages without an OpenSSL
> > linking exception either need to:
>
> 3) For indirect dependencies: make sure you're only using the bits
>of the (for example
On 7/17/05, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we only support upgrades to the next release and not any other its
> very clear to remove them from the archive.
Does 'not supporting' equal 'requiring it to fail'?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:14:07AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
> Yes, to rely on 1300 developers to all think of your cunning method of
> solving a problem clearly makes sense. After all, to *write down* a
> technique that solves the problem, and make it available to all of them
> would stilt their c
Steve Langasek writes:
> librudiments0
already done. bug report filed to remove the source package from
unstable.
> maxdb-7.5.00
not critical, no dependent packages. the maintainer works on getting
the package compiled with gcc-4.0
> stlport4.6
already done.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 03:19:54PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > Why not building curl --without-sssl and --with-gnutls=/usr? Maybe a
> > NMU?
>
> this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
> your package that is "broken". of course you could still file a
The same issue
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:09:04PM +0300, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > apt-get remove --purge libssl0.9.7 gives me tons of packages. Just
> > an estimation: We need to repack half of all packages then?
>
> NO.[1]
>
> All that needs to happen is that GP
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > apt-get remove --purge libssl0.9.7 gives me tons of packages. Just
> > > an estimation: We need to repack half of all packages then?
> >
> > NO.[1]
> >
> > All that needs to happen is that GPLed packages without an OpenSSL
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 7/17/05, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As we only support upgrades to the next release and not any other its
> > very clear to remove them from the archive.
> Does 'not supporting' equal 'requiring it to fail'?
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 10353 March 1977, Santiago Vila wrote:
we need to remove
from the archive all the Woody-to-Sarge transition dummy packages.
>>> No, that's not true, we don't *need* to remove woody-to-sarge dummy
>
Hi,
the actual maintainer of the snownews rss reader package
seems to be cast away. I talked to upstream and he has got
no contact to him in the last time at all.
I tried to wrote him to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and after 24 hours
I got a delayed bounce... He isn't not available anymore and
the upstream
> So I want to highjack the package.
> Any meanings?
Do it. Pop the trunk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:54:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
> libparagui1.0
Uploaded.
[...]
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
`. `' pho
[Bartosz Fenski]
> Seems that part of developers think that indirect linking with
> OpenSSL is ok, and part think it's not.
Yeah. Well. Stand back and look at why this 'linking' thing matters
in the first place. The point is to determine whether one work is a
"derivative" of another work. If
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:40:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> In this context, woody->sarge transition packages are just one form of
> useless cruft that we should strive to get rid of before the etch release.
I agree and I've been busy getting rid of that cruft. It's a
pleasure to see how much the
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> On 10353 March 1977, Santiago Vila wrote:
> we need to remove
> from the archive all the Woody-to-Sarge transition dummy packages.
> >>> No, t
Hi,
* Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-18 12:02]:
> > So I want to highjack the package.
> > Any meanings?
>
> Do it. Pop the trunk.
Ok because I don't really want to steal Jello the package I
will make a new package with the needed changes and new
upstream version, let him as the mainta
Re: Nico Golde in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> the actual maintainer of the snownews rss reader package
> seems to be cast away. I talked to upstream and he has got
> no contact to him in the last time at all.
>
> I tried to wrote him to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and after 24 hours
> I got a delayed bounce... He
Hi,
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-18 13:00]:
> Re: Nico Golde in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > the actual maintainer of the snownews rss reader package
> > seems to be cast away. I talked to upstream and he has got
> > no contact to him in the last time at all.
> >
> > I tried to wrote h
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 05:16:27AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Bartosz Fenski]
> > Seems that part of developers think that indirect linking with
> > OpenSSL is ok, and part think it's not.
> Yeah. Well. Stand back and look at why this 'linking' thing matters
> in the first place. The p
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:09:04PM +0300, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> > apt-get remove --purge libssl0.9.7 gives me tons of packages. Just
>> > an estimation: We need to repack half of all packages then?
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > On 7/17/05, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As we only support upgrades to the next release and not any other its
> > > very clear to remove them from the archive.
>
Your message to the list scoug-general has been rejected.
You are not a member of the list. For help on subscribing to
the list, please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "help" in the body of the message.
Your humble mailing list software,
Steward
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I guess the savest way is to have a libldap-nossl-dev and
> libldap-ssl-dev. The former should have anything ssl derived
> removed.
No, that was *worse*. We tried that before. The answer really is
reasonably simple- just modify libldap2 to use
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:06:13AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 03:19:54PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
> > your package that is "broken". of course you could still file a
>
> The same issues
On 7/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:06:13AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 03:19:54PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > > this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
> > > your package that is "b
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:03AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Sorry. The main idea is making power management more effective, that's
> > why earlier is better here.
>
> I dont see why this is the case. in the bootup phase the system is loaded
> a
Hi Goswin,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I guess the savest way is to have a libldap-nossl-dev and
> libldap-ssl-dev. The former should have anything ssl derived
> removed.
No problem. But then I can just build libldap without ssl as the library
built
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:06:20AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> No, that was *worse*. We tried that before. The answer really is
> reasonably simple- just modify libldap2 to use GNUTLS. That was done w/
> an older version of things involved. I expect it'll be done for the
> newer stuff.
Wor
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:29:46AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > The same issues as with libcurl applied to libldap2. They were
> > considered a bug in libldap2 back then because half the distribution
> > links it. Gave me a lot of recurring head aches.
>
> yes, and the same with libmysqlclient,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:06:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> A number of changes have been made to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] to
> support this. Firstly, the 'close' and 'reassign' commands now take
> extra version arguments, as follows:
>
> close 1234567 1.1
> reassign 1234567 example-package 2
* Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:06:20AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > No, that was *worse*. We tried that before. The answer really is
> > reasonably simple- just modify libldap2 to use GNUTLS. That was done w/
> > an older version of things inv
Hi debian-devel,My name is Daniel. I found you on
http://www.opensubscriber.com/search?q=2005+fete+du+14+juillet. I am sorry
if I intrude but I just have a quick question for you.
Since you seem to be more acquainted with the Internet than I
am,
maybe you can share your thoughts. A year ago I
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 16:36 +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:06:20AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > No, that was *worse*. We tried that before. The answer really is
> > reasonably simple- just modify libldap2 to use GNUTLS. That was done w/
> > an older version
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:35:45AM -0600, Rob Sims wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:06:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > A number of changes have been made to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] to
> > support this. Firstly, the 'close' and 'reassign' commands now take
> > extra version arguments, as follow
Will the slides be available in a central repository too? Having both
videos and slides would be nice for who missed the event, like me :'(
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20050717T213903-0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 20050716T195244-0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> That's a far cry different from someone wanting to enforce a
> >> requirement.
> >
> > Who, in this thread, is this hypothetical s
Below is a log of a transaction with apt-get and dpkg to first install
fontconfig and libfontconfig1, and then removing them. Installation goes
nicely, but the removal fails, because dpkg removes libfontconfig1 first
and only after it's done that does it remove fontconfig. Unfortunately,
fontconfig
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Below is a log of a transaction with apt-get and dpkg to first install
> fontconfig and libfontconfig1, and then removing them. Installation goes
> nicely, but the removal fails, because dpkg removes libfontconfig1 first
> and only after it's done that
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:01 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> I read it and thats why I asked before I have done
> something.
There is nothing in the MIA database about him and Echelon says that his
last message is dated Wed, 06 Jun 2005. Probably he is just suffering
from temporary mail failures.
Kind
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > You don't know that actually.
> > There are far too many usages to make a generic statement like that.
> > I can't see nothing wrong or useless in trying to maximize battery
> > power an
Hey [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Do you like watching cable T.V.?
PPV : Sports, Movies, Adult Channels, HBO ,Cinemax,
Starz, OnDemand, Ect. And the best part is you can
have all these channels with our product!
Our website : filtersppv.com
If you don't want this anymore, add /r to the domain
above to go
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:40:30PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 7/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes, and the same with libmysqlclient, which is why there's no longer ssl
> > support in the mysql packages :(
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to support SSL transparently i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> You don't know that actually.
> There are far too many usages to make a generic statement like that.
> I can't see nothing wrong or useless in trying to maximize battery
> power and/or minimize heat generation.
Yes of course, however there is a big diffe
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050717 18:50]:
> I am considering switching the init scripts of my packages to lsb-base
> (which means that it will have to be promoted to important priority, at
> least).
> If anybody has objections please voice them now.
Is there a way to configure this to not
On Jul 18, "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to configure this to not create masses of processes and
> confusing the user with colors?
You can write your own package which conflicts+provides lsb-base and
implements /lib/lsb/init-functions.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.
On Monday 18 July 2005 10:24 am, Mike Furr wrote:
> Of course, the results are based on Packages files, which means a lot
> could have happened from the time it was last updated and when you're
> viewing it. So be sure to check with the packages/buildds before doing
> anything. It will be updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Whoops, I see. So, just to further my comprehension here, why doesn't apt
> show up in the dependency tree of aptitude? Obviously libsigc has gone
> through the transition already, so it's not listed, but I'm quite certain
#include
* Javier Candeira [Sun, Jul 17 2005, 06:52:05PM]:
>
> YOU ROCK!!!
Ack, very nice, a beacon in the chaos of their patch repository.
Regards,
Eduard.
--
Wie man sein Kind nicht nennen sollte:
Dick Opf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Holger Levsen wrote:
> "the mighty video team", in boring alphabetical order (but you who where
> there
> know who they are), Andrew McMillan, Chris Halls, Erik Johansson, Henning
> Sprang, Herman Robak, Holger Levsen, Javier Candeira, John Lightsey,
> Kalle Boess, Martin Langhoff, Noel Koethe
> On 2005-07-17 14:00 PDT, Matthew Woodcraft writes:
Matthew> There is a lot of discussion of this question in bug
Matthew> 119517 (where the conclusion reached was that this is
Matthew> sometimes ok).
Wow, that was a long thread. Thanks for the pointer.
I will file bugs if it t
hi,
* Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-18 22:02]:
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:01 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > I read it and thats why I asked before I have done
> > something.
>
> There is nothing in the MIA database about him and Echelon says that his
> last message is dated Wed, 06 Jun 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I think you need to take virtual packages into account; apt-based stuff is
> showing up in Level 1, which AIUI is wrong.
Well, it does the best it can. It resolves all of the information it
has available. However, for examp
On 7/17/05, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upstream developers should get a clue and either properly license their
> software, stop using libcurl or adding gnutls support to it.
Upstream developers (and a lot of other people) should stop believing
the FSF's FUD about how it's not legal
On Monday, 18 July 2005 03:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> zipios++
I intended to NMU this one before the transition, so I guess I can NMU it now,
do the transition and fix the crash in amd64.
Best regards
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
Torsten Landschoff told:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > I guess the savest way is to have a libldap-nossl-dev and
> > libldap-ssl-dev. The former should have anything ssl derived
> > remov
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050718 20:17]:
> On Jul 18, "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to configure this to not create masses of processes and
> > confusing the user with colors?
> You can write your own package which conflicts+provides lsb-base and
> im
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050718 17:21]:
> The BTS records that bug #NN was fixed in 1.1-sarge1 and 1.3, and
> let's say the bug was found in version 1.1. Since it has the changelogs
> (it gets these from ftp-master), it can build up a tree of which package
> versions are based on whi
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:24:33PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> After starting writing a program to help me track my packages
> dependencies for the g++ transition, I decided to put up the results for
> the entire archive in case it was useful for others.
Looks useful.
Just to let you know:
On Monday, 18 July 2005 21:11, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Monday, 18 July 2005 03:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > zipios++
>
> I intended to NMU this one before the transition, so I guess I can NMU it
> now, do the transition and fix the crash in amd64.
Uhm, shouldn't cppunit be rebuilt before zipio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After starting writing a program to help me track my packages
dependencies for the g++ transition, I decided to put up the results for
the entire archive in case it was useful for others.
http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/
The main differe
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:52:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> In summary:
> libs linked again ssl need at least two dev-packages:
> libfoo-dev.deb and libfoo-ssl-dev.deb
>
> Right?
No. as mentioned earlier, this is no fault of the library
packages in question, and instead is the fau
On Monday 18 July 2005 11:23 am, Mike Furr wrote:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > I think you need to take virtual packages into account; apt-based stuff
> > is showing up in Level 1, which AIUI is wrong.
>
> Well, it does the best it can. It resolves all of the information it
> has available. Howe
Title: Manus
Dear Researcher,
Robhatah is delighted to announce, for the first time, our great line up
of robotic research platforms, DSPs, sensors, digital oscilloscopes and
other robotic/electronic products.
Do visit
On Monday, 18 July 2005 21:22, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Monday, 18 July 2005 21:11, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > On Monday, 18 July 2005 03:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > zipios++
> >
> > I intended to NMU this one before the transition, so I guess I can NMU it
> > now, do the transition and fix
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Jochen Voss wrote:
> > Just to let you know: ...
> yep, same bug.
I found another one ;-)
The entry "configlet(configlet-frontends)" should be level 6 instead of 8.
The tree starts out as
configlet-frontends
* python-con
* sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050717 21:20]:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Why not building curl --without-sssl and --with-gnutls=/usr? Maybe a
> > NMU?
>
> this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
> your package that is
ma, 2005-07-18 kello 18:51 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow kirjoitti:
> The problem is fontconfig / libfontconfig1. No one else is to
> blame. Cyclic depends will be broken at random places and will cause
> problems.
Ah yes, of course, I should have realized that. Thanks. It's not a dpkg
problem, and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Tulio Gontijo e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: terralib
Version : 3.0.3.2
Upstream Author : INPE/Tecgraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.terralib.org/
* License : LPGL
Description : A GIS cla
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:24:33PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> After starting writing a program to help me track my packages
> dependencies for the g++ transition, I decided to put up the results for
> the entire archive in case it was useful for others.
> http://people.debian.org
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:53:02AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Working on that. At least theoretically - when I get time, yada, yada.
>
> Steve Langasek had offered to help with this too. I'll poke him about
> it on IRC and see if he's still willing to help.
That's not too help
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > In this context, woody->sarge transition packages are just one
> > form of useless cruft that we should strive to get rid of before
> > the etch release. They're not the biggest source of cruft, but on
> > th
* Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:53:02AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Working on that. At least theoretically - when I get time, yada, yada.
> >
> > Steve Langasek had offered to help with this too. I'll poke him about
> > it on I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libccscript3
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : David Sugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/ccscript/
* License : GPL
Description : GNU Common C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libccaudio2
Version : 0.7.6
Upstream Author : David Sugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/ccaudio
* License : GPL
Description : GNU ccAudio2 -
Xin vui long gui cho chung toi gia ve may bay khu
hoi cho 2 nguoi di tu Noi Bai toi Thuong Hai,Trung Quoc trong cuoi thang
7.
Thanks
Ms Huyen
0912646876
* Mattia Dongili
| On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:03AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
| > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
| > > Sorry. The main idea is making power management more effective, that's
| > > why earlier is better here.
| >
| > I dont see why this is the case. in the bootup
Updates to this list:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:54:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> libccaudio
-- I'm preparing to work on this one
> libccscript
-- uploaded by the maintainer
> libchipcard
> libcrypto++
> libgwenhywfar
> libinti1.0
> libktoblzcheck
> libmodplug
-- I've just NMUed thi
78 matches
Mail list logo
