hi, On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:52:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > In summary: > libs linked again ssl need at least two dev-packages: > libfoo-dev.deb and libfoo-ssl-dev.deb > > Right?
No. as mentioned earlier, this is no fault of the library
packages in question, and instead is the fault of upstream authors'
and/or other package maintainers not comprehending the implications of
the gpl. there were other options brought up in this thread that would
be a better course of action. this also doesn't solve the problem, and
will only complicate things further when another similar style license
problem comes out.
> Should it be worst to announce this to debian-devel-announce?
no.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
