In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Now that we have released sarge, I would like to ask debian-admin and
>the Project Leader to consider seriously doing something to reduce the
>level of spam we have to receive, store, and filter in our @debian.org
>addresses.
I recomed usi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libparse-debianchangelog-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : not yet
* License : GPL
Description : parse changelog
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recomed using spamhaus SBL-XBL, or at least CBL (which is included in
> SBL-XBL).
Spamhaus's rather irresponsible behavior in the past[*] hasn't left a
happy impression; have they cleaned up their act lately?
[*] Extremely lax standards for listings,
On 17/06/05, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > gkdial -- PPP dial-up configuration and dialing tool [#287992]
> > * Orphaned 164 days ago
> > * 1 RC bugs.
>
> Does any graphical ppp frontend exist that can be used instead of this?
there is kppp (?) for KDE, and
Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package. I am
taking over as maintainer and uploaded a new version that also closed a
couple of bugs and moved it from non-US to main. If linking with libssl
is not permissible, should the version that is currently in Sarge be
slated for removal
* Wouter Verhelst:
> What's painful about it?
I wouldn't be surprised if it already increases load on
lists.debian.org significantly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.17.0208 +0200]:
> And unless they know about the completely non-standard /etc/umask.conf,
> they'll still edit multiple files.
True enough... unless files like /etc/profile include some magic
code for umask (rather than the umask call itself
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> iceme -- A graphical menu editor for IceWM [#227054]
> * Orphaned 520 days ago
> * Package orphaned > 360 days ago.
>
> icepref -- Yet another configuration tool for IceWM [#227077]
> * Orphaned 520 days ago
> * Package
> Filing a bug against login...
(shadow maintainer hat on)
bugger...:-)
I was reading this thread and just told to self : dude, this will end
up in a BR against shadow/login:-)
So, to summarize, the rationale here is : don't set umask in the
default login.defs and leave this to shells and/o
> day. Many of the false positives were from the same people, who could
> have removed their CBL listing easily. (If they didn't fix the
Hmmm, IIRC I was among these ones and the reasons was the CBL listing
all dynamic and non dynamic addresses from Free, one of the 2-3 major
ISPs for DSL in Fr
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.17.0658 +0200]:
> So, to summarize, the rationale here is : don't set umask in the
> default login.defs and leave this to shells and/or pam_umask.
> Right?
Yes.
> I have to keep some kind of explanation for the default login.defs
> file,
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst:
>
> > What's painful about it?
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if it already increases load on
> lists.debian.org significantly.
>
>
Not nearly as much as people who teergrub us. We can _really_ feel them.
Cheers,
Pasc
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:45 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's painful about it?
> >
> > It stops a lot of viruses and spam, with no false positives. What's the
> > problem?
>
> "No false positives" seems a bit optimistic.
>
> One problem I've encou
[Santiago Vila]
> For example, we could use greylisting. Or we could reject messages that
> are known to come directly from trojanized windows machines acting as
> open proxies. Or even better, we could do both things.
Or a completely different option. Here at the university the
postmasters implem
Le Ven 17 Juin 2005 01:42, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:09:47PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Jeu 16 Juin 2005 14:33, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > > Now that we have released sarge, I would like to ask debian-admin
> > > and the Project Leader to consider seriously d
gmail.com used to do that to lists.debian.org. We deliver ~300,000
emails to gmail a day. It resulted in some deliveries timing out before
they were even attempted; I'll let you imagine the rest.
Cheers,
Pasc
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Santiago Vila]
> > Fo
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
