> day. Many of the false positives were from the same people, who could > have removed their CBL listing easily. (If they didn't fix the
Hmmm, IIRC I was among these ones and the reasons was the CBL listing all dynamic and non dynamic addresses from Free, one of the 2-3 major ISPs for DSL in France. And, IIRC, again, I just gave up, routed my mail to you through my ISP mail server and went to another tasks because I consider I have other things to do than just hunting down why my address is listed in this or that blacklist. No real angryness here...I have been able to circumvent the problem but, well, no real happyness as well...:-) About greylisting : that's a nice feature of course. But just try some day to send the mails you wrote during a long airline flight from a WiFi hotspot in an airport and do it through a server implementing greylisting : you'll just find out that no mail can be sent unless you stay connected for a quite long time. User-configurable greylisting thus seems mandatory if we want to have it. Same for any BL system on debian.org systems, probably, if this can be made (other people are mail wizards, you included, Blars....I am definitely not..:-))). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]