On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:31:02PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so
> GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
> Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the so
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:58:55PM +0300, Sergei I. Kononov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03 at 20:23:20 (+0100), Christoph Berg wrote:
>
> > What's the difference to makejail and debootstrap?
>
> 1. Created chroot enviroment use less disk space, and does not
> include not needed files/dirs (like: passwd
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > It works and is available from dak.ganneff.de. And the packages is
> > used on several archives now. Its just not out of NEW atm.
> So, let's *guess* ...
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:28:19AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:58:55PM +0300, Sergei I. Kononov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03 at 20:23:20 (+0100), Christoph Berg wrote:
> >
> > > What's the difference to makejail and debootstrap?
> >
> > 1. Created chroot enviroment us
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 09:20 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:31:02PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so
> > GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
> > Copyright (C) 2003
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> There's also the fact that an executable libc is a nice way to
> circumvent a 'noexec' restriction on a mount point :-)
Are you refering to the ld.so trick which use to work or another one?
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I don't think libc has to be executable; simply
> running /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /file/on/noexec/partition will work just
> fine.
I think recent ynamic linkers prevent this from beeing abused on noexec
media. However there is no reliable way to check any ex
ÒæÑæäÇ Ýí ãæÞÚ ãÏíäÉ ßáÈÇÁ
ãÏíäÉ ÊÇÈÚå áÇãÇÑÉ ÇáÔÇÑÞÉ ÈÏæáÉ ÇáÇãÇÑÇÊ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ ÇáãÊÍÏå
ÇÏÎá Úáì åÐÇ ÇáÑÇÈØ
http://www.kalbacity.net
äÚÊÐÑ Úä Ãí ÇÒÚÇÌ æíãßäßã ÊÌÇåá ÇáÑÓÇáå æÇáÓãæÍå
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
ÒæÑæäÇ Ýí ãæÞÚ ãÏíäÉ ßáÈÇÁ
ãÏíäÉ ÊÇÈÚå áÇãÇÑÉ ÇáÔÇÑÞÉ ÈÏæáÉ ÇáÇãÇÑÇÊ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ ÇáãÊÍÏå
ÇÏÎá Úáì åÐÇ ÇáÑÇÈØ
http://www.kalbacity.net
äÚÊÐÑ Úä Ãí ÇÒÚÇÌ æíãßäßã ÊÌÇåá ÇáÑÓÇáå æÇáÓãæÍå
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
ÒæÑæäÇ Ýí ãæÞÚ ãÏíäÉ ßáÈÇÁ
ãÏíäÉ ÊÇÈÚå áÇãÇÑÉ ÇáÔÇÑÞÉ ÈÏæáÉ ÇáÇãÇÑÇÊ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ ÇáãÊÍÏå
ÇÏÎá Úáì åÐÇ ÇáÑÇÈØ
http://www.kalbacity.net
äÚÊÐÑ Úä Ãí ÇÒÚÇÌ æíãßäßã ÊÌÇåá ÇáÑÓÇáå æÇáÓãæÍå
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Title: www.ExtShop.com
Değerli Müşterilerimiz; www.extshop.com sanal mağzamız alternatif ve ekstrem ürünleri tek bir platform altında toplamak amacı ile kurulmuştur.Distribütörü olduğumuz ürünler ile satışa başladık ve birçok
On 3 Feb 2005, at 5:53 pm, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi,
as I understand myself as someone aware of the support problems of
software problems, I would like to point to 2 problems:
1. the Debian Kernel is a bit different from the kernel.org Kernel;
example: at work we used the Apani VPN client, which d
贵公司财务经理：
您好！我公司属深圳一家实业有限责任公司，有提供全国通用的核销单，
有剩余发票可为贵公司代开，如普通销售发票、运输发票、
建筑安装发票、广告发票、海关缴款书、增值税票等等。
欢迎合作!
刘经理：13530264612
深圳市创景宏实业有限公司
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
ÒæÑæäÇ Ýí ãæÞÚ ãÏíäÉ ßáÈÇÁ
ãÏíäÉ ÊÇÈÚå áÇãÇÑÉ ÇáÔÇÑÞÉ ÈÏæáÉ ÇáÇãÇÑÇÊ ÇáÚÑÈíÉ ÇáãÊÍÏå
ÇÏÎá Úáì åÐÇ ÇáÑÇÈØ
http://www.kalbacity.net
äÚÊÐÑ Úä Ãí ÇÒÚÇÌ æíãßäßã ÊÌÇåá ÇáÑÓÇáå æÇáÓãæÍå
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Hi
http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
shows http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=293125
as RC though it is security,woody.
Is it the fact that it was reopened before the sarge,sid tags were removed
or does woody security appear in sarge RC ?
Alban
Please Cc as i am
显像管:14英寸视频输入输出:BNC接口输入/输出音频输入/输出:RCA接口输入/输出面板控制:菜单(亮度、色饱和度、对比度、色调、音量)电源开关电源：电源输入范围100-230V AC电力消耗：最大60W机身尺寸：365mmX342mmX391mm(WxHxD)净重：12公斤解析度：最大NTSC420线、PAL480线水平同步范围:15.625KHZ大于或等于500HZ垂直同步范围:50HZ/60HZ大于或等于3HZ音频功率：最大1
.0H工作温度:0"C-40"C工作湿度:10-90%广州市远辉数码科技有限公司联系人:赵巧辉电话:020-82349026/88303097http:
On Friday 04 February 2005 02:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schreef Frederik Dannemare:
> > > > which
> > > > requires no imprimatur from the DPL, before you start throwing
> > > > packages that hav
以下报价是全国统一价，在此基础上打75折
如有需要请致电0755 81957902 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QQ:258833788(购买超过300元以上，广东省内免费送货）
家居系列：
乐新多用途浓缩清洁剂 1升 定价：￥41.30
绿茵浓缩空气清新剂 100克 46.30
Amway皮革亮洁剂 500毫升 71.30
丽宝磨粒亮洁剂 500毫升 61.30
典雅家具亮洁剂 500毫升 71.30
速洁浓缩去渍剂 1升 37.50
碟新浓缩洗洁精 1升 47.50
透丽浓缩玻璃清洁剂 1升 35.00
衣洁系列：
丝白纤细衣物洗涤剂 1升 定价：￥8
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: player
Version : 0.1pr1
Upstream Author : Milosz Derezynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linux-media.net/player/
* License : GPL
Description : music player and
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 13:26 +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 02:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schreef Frederik Dannemare:
> > > > > which
> > > > > requires no impri
Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>* Package name: player
> Version : 0.1pr1
> Upstream Author : Milosz Derezynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>* URL : http://linux-media.net/player/
>* License : GPL
> De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lpr-via-http
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : https://gna.org/projects/lpr-via-http/
* License : GPL
Description : a web frontend for lpr queue monitoring and
On Friday 04 February 2005 14:14, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 13:26 +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 02:30, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > Op do, 03-02-2005 te 15:44 +0100, schre
On Feb 04, 2005 at 13:39, Steve McIntyre praised the llamas by saying:
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
> >Package: wnpp
> >Severity: wishlist
> >Owner: Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >* Package name: player
> > Version : 0.1pr1
> > Upstream Author : Milosz Derezynski <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:39:16PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Please use a less generic name. "player" alone means very little and
> is likely to cause confusion.
also, keep in mind that a package named "player" (different
software) was previously ITP'd, and the packager was told
the same thin
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 14:06 +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: lpr-via-http
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : https://gna.org/projects/lpr-via-http/
> * License : GPL
>
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> As of right now it is troublesome to build e.g. gl stuff as a maintainer
> if you are using the nvidia drivers on your system. I'm sure there are
> many, many other scenarios to choose from.
Well, you CAN setup a clean sid pbuilder/chroot, you kno
Frederik Dannemare wrote:
[snip]
> I surely hope they would still do so. Another option could simply be to
> proceed with the current way of uploading - but then let the buildd
> rebuild the uploaded binary. Or is that somehow not feasible?
Actually, requiring a binary upload _plus_ rebuilding i
On Friday 04 February 2005 15:02, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > As of right now it is troublesome to build e.g. gl stuff as a
> > maintainer if you are using the nvidia drivers on your system. I'm
> > sure there are many, many other scenario
On Friday 04 February 2005 15:02, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > I surely hope they would still do so. Another option could simply
> > be to proceed with the current way of uploading - but then let the
> > buildd rebuild the uploaded binary. Or is that somehow not
>
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 15:02, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > > As of right now it is troublesome to build e.g. gl stuff as a
> > > maintainer if you are using the nvidia drivers on your s
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> uploading source-only? It would be better to set up a arch-indep
> autobuilder (on a FAST machine that can handle pbuilder's unpacking of
Which does *not* upload the packages. Better write it just in case
someone didn't get the idea...
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:31:02PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so
>> GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
>> Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Fo
Re: Frederik Dannemare in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For instance, the issue with nvidia and building gl apps I mentioned: I
> have a sid chroot (debootstrap) on my sarge desktop machine which uses
> the nvidia driver. Trying to start X in the chroot with the normal nv
> driver failed due to nvidia a
Frederik Dannemare wrote:
[snip]
> > Always build packages for uploads in a clean environment (a fresh
> > chroot if nothing else is available).
>
> I absolutely agree. But it still doesn't have to be 100% problem-free
> (letting buildd build all packages on all archs for distribution would
> st
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The way to circumvent a noexec is to call the dynamic linker like I
> did for libc:
>
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Is it? In sid, ia32:
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 ./test
./test: error while loading shared libraries: ./test: failed to map segment
from
Op vr, 04-02-2005 te 15:54 +0100, schreef Goswin von Brederlow:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There's also the fact that an executable libc is a nice way to
> > circumvent a 'noexec' restriction on a mount point :-)
>
> How does libc help?
[...]
> Libc doesn't execute its argum
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 13:39 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >* Package name: player
> > Description : music player and organizer for GNOME
> Please use a less generic name. "player" alone means very little and
> is likely to cause confusion.
Yeah, I already thought about it. I'll probabl
* Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-04T11:19:34-0500]:
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 13:39 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > >* Package name: player
> > > Description : music player and organizer for GNOME
>
> > Please use a less generic name. "player" alone means very little and
>
On Friday 04 February 2005 15:47, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 15:02, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > > > As of right now it is troublesome to build e.g.
On Friday 04 February 2005 15:59, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > > Always build packages for uploads in a clean environment (a fresh
> > > chroot if nothing else is available).
> >
> > I absolutely agree. But it still doesn't have to be 100%
> > problem-free (lettin
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > If people don't do even THAT much, you want them to have the
> > possibility of uploading source-only?
> [ snip ]
> No. That was not my intend. Read
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg00199.html
Then we agree :)
--
"One disk
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:47:28PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> It would be better to set up a arch-indep
> autobuilder (on a FAST machine that can handle pbuilder's unpacking of
> chroots, so that chroot crappage won't happen so often) and file FTBFS
> automatically.
We build all b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: avida
Version : 2.0b7
Upstream Author : California Institute of Technology <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dllab.caltech.edu/avida/
* License : GPL v2
Description :
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The way to circumvent a noexec is to call the dynamic linker like I
>> did for libc:
>>
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>
> Is it? In sid, ia32:
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ./test
> ./test: err
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Or just upload into glucks delayed queue into day 0.
What kind of delay does that introduce in the upload? I assume the queue
only runs daily, even for day 0?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xen
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/
* License : GPL / BSD license
D
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Thomas Wana wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: xen
> Version : 2.0.4
> Upstream Author : University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/S
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005, Thomas Wana wrote:
> * Package name: xen
xen is already in unstable.
xen: (a Virtual Machine Monitor like User-Mode-Linux), section misc,
is extra. Version: 1.2-4.1 (sid), Packaged size: 657 kB, Installed
size: 716 kB
Don Armstrong
--
Frankly, if ignor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ttf-tibetan
Version : 20041206
Upstream Author : THDL Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://iris.lib.virginia.edu/tibet/tools/dls/fonts/
* License : GPL
Description : A Unicode OpenType font for Tibeta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: schedtool
Version : 1.2.4
Upstream Author : Freek
* URL : http://freequaos.host.sk/schedtool/
* License : GPL2
Description : cpu schedule policy tool
It can be used to avoid skipping for A/V-applications,
* Joey Hess [Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:58:45 -0500]:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Or just upload into glucks delayed queue into day 0.
> What kind of delay does that introduce in the upload? I assume the queue
> only runs daily, even for day 0?
Just in case you didn't notice the reply is elsewhere in t
Le lundi 31 janvier 2005 à 08:58 +, David Pashley a écrit :
> On Jan 31, 2005 at 04:46, Hamish Moffatt praised the llamas by saying:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:31:03AM +0100, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > > My package works as designed, but let me know if you can design
>
53 matches
Mail list logo
