Hello there,
I was wondering too, why there is no SA3 in sarge yet. A friend of mine
asked to write a couple words about this new version from a system
administrator view.
When I was using 2.6x series, the main tool to mark spam was bayes
database, and some others tests would help to identify s
Hi,
* Ramunas Vabolis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 09:15]:
> I was wondering too, why there is no SA3 in sarge yet. A friend of mine
> asked to write a couple words about this new version from a system
> administrator view.
Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
Hello Andrew,
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-16 12:05]:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:26:19PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > hi,
> > is the maintainer of the bash currently the same as the maintainer of
> > the csh?
>
> Don't think so:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep-available -s Packa
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> i dont use this shell. i read an article which said that on old systems
> this command in the csh freezes the whole system. i tried it an noticed
> that it isnt clean yet.
This has nothing to do with the shell. Its a fork-bomb, and you
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
> the previous upload, the transfer to sarge is a bit delayed. I expect
> that SA3 will go in one of these days, and it is _definitly_ on my
> direct watch list.
Eliminate pain with C0D3INE. Try it at only $2.49/p1LL
http://yougurtsful.com/33/5/index.php?ai=7333
-
lowry tumult ku amphibian
_
OxUxT
www.yougurtsful.com/unsub/
%RND_TEXT
%RND_TEXT
* Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 12:30]:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
> > the previous upload, the transfer to sarge is a bit delayed. I expect
> > that SA3 will go in o
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 12:30]:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
> > > the previous upload, the transfer to sarge is
Hi,
When running apt-get dist-upgrade I'd like to be able to set a list of
packages whose confiles shall be replaced by the newer versions
supplied by the package (if any) , while other packages' confiles
should be keep the locally modified version.
Is this possible?
Cheers,
Free
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 14:55]:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 12:30]:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had mass
Hi,
Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
-dev).
Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
$ apt-file search \.pc | grep pc$ | grep pkgconfig | grep -v dev
beast: usr/lib/pkgconfig/bse.pc
beast: usr/lib/pkg
hello
i have a problem using apt under small disk, on a PC under debian and
another during debian installation (pre-rc2).
On the first PC, i do a 'apt-get upgrade' but there is no place to
download packages and after configure them. i finally succeed by
selecting package one by one 'apt-get inst
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
>
Did you actually check whether any of these *had* -dev packages?! A lot
of them would be bogus bugs.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:03PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > IMHO it only *has* to be fixed in sarge if it affects upgrades from
> > 2.20, which is in stable. Otherwise, documentation on NEWS.Debian should be
> > enough.
It doesn't affect upgrades from 2.20 which have no Bayes at all. The
o
* Duncan Findlay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 16:50]:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:03PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I agree with you that fixing is only required if this might be a problem
> > for upgrades from woody. As this bug report is quite young, I think the
> > best thing really is to
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:12 +0100, sferriol wrote:
> hello
> i have a problem using apt under small disk, on a PC under debian and
> another during debian installation (pre-rc2).
> On the first PC, i do a 'apt-get upgrade' but there is no place to
> download packages and after configure them. i f
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
>
> Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
>
> A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
>
> $ apt-file search \.pc | grep pc$ | grep pkgconfig | grep -v de
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:49PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
Yep... I wrote about it few days ago.
> Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
>
> A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
[...]
Hello,
from time to time (about 1-2 time in three month) debmirror fails with
the following error:
---
$ /usr/bin/debmirror -v /tmp/debian --arch=i386 --host=debian.tu-bs.de
--nosource --getcontents --dist=testing
Mirroring to /home1/ftp/pub/debian/debian from
ftp://anonymous:
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 16:16 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not
> > the -dev).
>
> Did you actually check whether any of these *had* -dev packages?! A lot
> of
Ron Johnson a Ãcrit :
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:12 +0100, sferriol wrote:
hello
i have a problem using apt under small disk, on a PC under debian and
another during debian installation (pre-rc2).
On the first PC, i do a 'apt-get upgrade' but there is no place to
download packages and after configu
> "Matthew" == Matthew Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not just any person should take this package on, as it is highly
> technical. I am looking for someone with a background in IPSEC and in
> network programming. I am also looking to help out from time to time and
> add new functionalit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: q-tools
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/q-tools
License : GPL
Description : collection of ia64 performance analysis tools
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:29:38PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> When running apt-get dist-upgrade I'd like to be able to set a list of
> packages whose confiles shall be replaced by the newer versions
> supplied by the package (if any) , while other packages' confiles
> should be keep
El Jueves 11 Noviembre 2004 07:50, Mike Hommey escribió:
> Anyways, I'd suggest to make a multi-binary package so that it produces
> several mozilla-firefox-locale-* packages.
> Mike
I've just uploaded a new version (1.0-3) that generates separate binary
packages for each language.
The remaining
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:49PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
>
> Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
I guess the mass bug filing is ok, but you could have waited longer than
four hours for consen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to
> collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of
> a packager easier.
>
> I'm sure all packagers have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fl-cow
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Davide Libenzi
* URL : http://xmailserver.org/flcow.html
* License : GPL
Description : copy-on-write utility
Fl-cow allows you to utilise hard links to save disk space
You need Codeine. You get it here. No need to wait any longer!
It is your unique chance to save on the medications up to 70%.
http://yougurtsful.com/33/5/index.php?ai=7333
-
hotel checklist topologize deliverance
_
OxUxT
www.yougurtsful.com/unsub/
%RND_TEXT
%RND_TE
29 matches
Mail list logo
